AMAZON #1
BEST SELLER
IN PAIN MEDICINE
AMAZON #1
BEST SELLER
IN PAIN MEDICINE
Preface │ Introduces the book’s purpose: empowering healthcare professionals to integrate evidence-based cannabinoid therapies for improved patient outcomes.
Chapter 1 – Introduction to Endocannabinoid Medicine │ Explains the endocannabinoid system, its receptors, history, and role in health, disease, and potential therapeutic applications.
Chapter 2 – Cannabinoid Pharmacology Simplified │ Summarizes key cannabinoids, terpenes, VOCs, pharmacokinetics, and the “entourage effect” in cannabis-based medical interventions.
Chapter 3 – Master Safety Before Giving Recommendations │ Covers side effects, contraindications, interactions, and monitoring strategies for safe cannabinoid use in diverse patients.
Chapter 4 – Dosing Strategies and Administration │ Provides systematic dosing principles, pharmacogenomics, delivery methods, titration, and clinical pearls for personalized care.
Chapter 5 – Regulatory and Recommendation Guidelines │ Reviews U.S. and global cannabis laws, compliance standards, certification processes, and provider responsibilities.
Chapter 6 – Evidence-Based Therapeutic Applications │ Summarizes research on cannabinoids in chronic pain, mental health, neurology, autoimmune diseases, and opioid reduction.
Chapter 7 – Clinical Cases (Pain, Mental Health, Neurology) │ Presents 25 patient cases showing cannabinoid therapies integrated with conventional and supportive treatments.
Chapter 8 – Clinical Cases (Pediatrics, GI, HIV/AIDS, Cancer) │ Describes 25 specialized cases highlighting cannabinoid roles in pediatric, geriatric, oncology, gastrointestinal, and infectious diseases.
Chapter 9 – Common FAQs from Patients │ Answers patient-centered questions on safety, efficacy, dosing, side effects, legality, and product use.
Chapter 10 – Common FAQs from Colleagues │ Provides evidence-based responses for clinicians on integration, regulation, dosing, monitoring, ethics, and research gaps.
Hameed et al., 2023 – Narrative Review (USA) Surveyed clinical studies on cannabis for chronic noncancer pain. Reported consistent analgesia and improved function in lumbar pain, neuropathy, fibromyalgia, and cancer pain.
Patients: Multiple populations (low back, neuropathic, migraine, cancer). Findings: Cannabis decreased pain scores and improved QoL; well-tolerated.
Conclusion: Effective adjunct when conventional options fail. 🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36897501/
Lee et al., 2023 – Systematic Review (Canada/USA) Analyzed evidence for cannabis in low-back pain (LBP).
Patients: 13 trials; >110 participants with chronic LBP. Intervention: Varied formulations (THC, nabilone, CBD-dominant).
Findings: Most studies reported reduced pain intensity; limited long-term data.
Conclusion: Cannabis shows potential for LBP, but larger RCTs needed. 🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38041708/
Bennici et al., 2021 – Safety Review (Italy) Evaluated safety of cannabis in neuropathic chronic pain.
Patients: Derived from multiple trials in neuropathy. Findings: Cannabis well-tolerated, side effects mainly dizziness and sedation, no major safety signals.
Conclusion: Safe in neuropathic pain management, but requires pharmacovigilance. 🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34684842/
Jeddi et al., 2024 – Network Meta-analysis (Canada) Compared cannabis vs opioids in chronic pain.
Patients: 90 RCTs, ~22,000 total. Findings: Both gave modest pain relief; cannabis had fewer discontinuations due to side effects.
Conclusion: Cannabis may be a safer alternative to opioids. 🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38171632/
Vannabouathong et al., 2021 – Cost-effectiveness Study (Canada) Modeled cannabis therapies for chronic knee osteoarthritis.
Findings: Cannabis oils, softgels, and low-dose inhalation were cost-effective vs non-surgical care. Conclusion: Cannabis is an economical adjunct for knee OA.
🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33795939/
Paland et al., 2023 – Scoping Review (Israel) Focused on rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
Patients: Synthesized 30+ studies, preclinical and clinical. Findings: Pt reports reduced pain and stiffness; mechanistic evidence supports anti-inflammatory role.
Conclusion: Promising, but more high-quality trials required. 🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37917863/
Poudel et al., 2021 – Literature Review (USA) Reviewed cannabis in migraine and headache.
Patients: 34 studies, varied populations. Findings: Reduced migraine frequency and duration, better tolerance of attacks.
Conclusion: Cannabis may help resistant migraine, further trials needed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34589318/
Sherpa et al., 2022 – Systematic Review (Nepal/USA) Reviewed efficacy of cannabis in migraine.
Patients: 9 studies, ~5,600 patients. Findings: Cannabis reduced migraine pain and frequency, generally safe.
Conclusion: Promising therapy for migraines. 🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36660507/
Seevathee et al., 2024 – RCT (Thailand) assessed topical cannabis cream for diabetic neuropathy.
Patients: 100 with painful diabetic neuropathy. Intervention: Transdermal THC:CBD:CBN.
Findings: Pain reduced ~80% vs baseline; adverse events rare and mild. Conclusion: Strong candidate therapy for diabetic neuropathy.
🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39720705/
Mücke et al., 2018 – Cochrane Review (International) Evaluated cannabis-based medicines in neuropathic pain.
Patients: 16 RCTs, ~1750 adults. Findings: Small pain reductions; increased withdrawal due to side effects.
Conclusion: Limited benefit, modest evidence quality. 🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29513392/
Lopera et al., 2024 – Systematic Review (Colombia) Focused on fibromyalgia patients.
Patients: 19 studies included. Findings: Cannabis improved pain, sleep, and QoL; no major adverse events.
Conclusion: Effective adjunct with good tolerability. 🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39498228/
Strand et al., 2023 – Systematic Review (USA) Evaluated cannabis for fibromyalgia.
Patients: 12 trials analyzed. Findings: Some pain relief and better sleep, but evidence low quality.
Conclusion: Insufficient data for strong recommendations. 🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37371716/
Häuser et al., 2023 – Cochrane Review (International) Cannabis in cancer-related pain.
Patients: 14 RCTs, 1823 adults. Findings: THC:CBD sprays no better than placebo; mixed results overall.
Conclusion: Ineffective for severe cancer pain. 🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37283486/
Teoh et al., 2018 – ASCO Educational Review (USA) Reviewed post-chemo neuropathy management.
Findings: Cannabis may help peripheral neuropathy, anxiety, sleep issues. Conclusion: Adjunctive tool in survivorship and palliative settings.
🔗 https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/EDBK_209437
Okusanya et al., 2020 – Systematic Review (USA) Cannabis in opioid tapering for chronic pain.
Findings: Reduced opioid use by ~65–74% across studies. Conclusion: Supports opioid-sparing role.
🔗 https://systematicreviewsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13643-020-01425-3
Jeddi et al., 2024 – Meta-analysis (Canada) See above in Chronic Pain.
Conclusion: Cannabis = opioids for pain, fewer discontinuations. 🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38171632/
Vitale et al., 2021 – Mechanistic Review (Italy) Examined CBD’s receptor targets and neuropsychiatric effects.
Conclusion: CBD shows broad promise in anxiety/PTSD. 🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34062987/
Perry et al., 2024 – RCT (Canada)
Patients: 38 adults, fMRI under stress. Findings: CBD expectancy reduced amygdala activity; anxiolytic placebo effect.
Conclusion: Expectancy influences CBD outcomes. 🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39400103/
Berger et al., 2022 – Review (Australia)
Patients: Anxiety disorder populations. Findings: CBD may help anxiety; THC results mixed.
Conclusion: CBD promising, THC cautious. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35908759/
Nacasch et al., 2023 – Observational (Israel)
Patients: 14 combat veterans with PTSD. Findings: Improved symptoms and sleep, nightmares unchanged.
Conclusion: Cannabis beneficial adjunct/resistant PTSD. 🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36741572/
Rehman et al., 2021 – Systematic Review (Canada)
Patients: 10 studies, mostly veterans. Findings: Cannabis reduced PTSD symptoms, limited evidence.
Conclusion: Encouraging but needs RCTs. 🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34183989/
García-Gutiérrez et al., 2020 – Review (Spain) Findings: CBD may aid anxiety, depression, psychosis.
Conclusion: Safe, promising psychiatric adjunct. 🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33228239/
Stasiłowicz-Krzemień et al., 2024 – Review (Poland) Findings: CBD effective in pediatric epilepsy; cannabinoids may help MS, PD.
Conclusion: Strong role in epilepsy, emerging elsewhere. 🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38891938/
Hidding et al., 2024 – Clinical Update (Germany) Findings: Cannabis effective in MS spasticity, epilepsy, early PD.
Conclusion: Supports select neurologic use. 🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38015317/
Tzadok et al., 2024 – Retrospective (Israel) Patients: 188 children with refractory epilepsy.
Findings: CBD reduced seizures ~50%; safe. Conclusion: Reinforces CBD’s role in epilepsy.
🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37995414/
Dallabrida et al., 2024 – Review (Brazil) Findings: ECS dysregulation linked to autism, ADHD, Alzheimer’s.
Conclusion: ECS-targeted therapy holds potential. 🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38928592/
Palmieri & Vadalà, 2023 – Case Series (Italy) Patients: Alzheimer’s with agitation/weight loss.
Findings: THC:CBD extract improved behavior, appetite. Conclusion: Useful for symptom management.
🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36655645/
Trojan et al., 2023 – Review (Czech Republic) Findings: CBD neuroprotective, may slow Alzheimer’s.
Conclusion: Promising anti-aging/anti-neurodegeneration. 🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37892128/
Ferreira et al., 2023 – Biomarker Study (Canada/Brazil) Findings: ECS markers altered in Alzheimer’s, correlated with severity.
Conclusion: Supports ECS as therapeutic target. 🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36394442/
Siani-Rose et al., 2023 – Pharmacometabolomics (USA) Patients: 20 children with autism.
Findings: Cannabis-responsive biomarkers tracked improvements. Conclusion: Biomarkers may guide personalized ASD therapy.
🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34874191/
Sousa & DiFrancisco-Donoghue, 2023 – Pilot (USA) Patients: 12 PD patients.
Findings: Cannabis improved pain, tremor, sleep. Conclusion: Encouraging pilot results.
🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37621812/
de Brito Siqueira et al., 2023 – Review (Brazil) Findings: Broad applications in neurology, from pain to PD.
Conclusion: Widespread potential, needs trials. 🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38020546/
Rainka et al., 2023 – Retrospective (USA) Patients: 250 MS patients.
Findings: Cannabis reduced spasticity, pain, improved function. Conclusion: Real-world supportive evidence.
🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37250194/
Murphy et al., 2024 – Registry Study (UK) Patients: 349 MS patients. Findings: Registry data showed improved MS symptoms.
Conclusion: Validates cannabis’s benefit in MS. 🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38728958/
Purohit et al., 2024 – Survey (USA) Pts: 150 with RA and PsA. Findings: Cannabis reduced stiffness, fatigue, and pain.
Conclusion: Symptom relief, further trials warranted. 🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39583459/
Paland et al., 2023 – Scoping Review (Israel) (See Chronic Pain RA entry) 🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37917863/
Nso et al., 2021 – Scoping Review (USA) Patients: IBD populations. Findings: Cannabis improved pain, appetite, remission periods; unclear effect on inflammation. Conclusion: Useful for QoL in IBD. 🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34804696/
Picardo et al., 2019 – Narrative Review (Canada) Findings: Cannabis improved symptoms in Crohn’s/UC, less steroid need.
Conclusion: Adjunct for refractory IBD. 🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31523278/
Bukowska, 2024 – Review (Poland) Findings: Cannabinoids show antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer effects.
Conclusion: Wide therapeutic promise. 🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39684447/
Conclusion - The findings support MC as a harm reduction tool, highlighting its potential to decrease reliance on opioids and improve quality of life in chronic conditions.
Title: A Retrospective Analysis of Access to Medicinal Cannabis: Elucidating the Relationship between Cannabis and the ‘Harm Reduction’ Approach to Chronic Conditions
This study, co-authored by Dr. Terel S. Newton, M.D., investigates the relationship between access to medicinal cannabis (MC) and reductions in opioid-related harm. Using de-identified patient data from state MC registries, the research analyzes the experiences of patients with chronic conditions who were on long-term opioid therapy.
Methods - Standardized tools included the McGill Pain Questionnaire, GAD-7, PHQ-9, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and others to measure pain, anxiety, depression, sleep quality, and PTSD symptoms. Analysis covered substance use, mental health indicators, and medication dosage trends before and after MC access.
Key Findings
Opioid Reduction: States with established MC programs saw opioid-related overdoses reduced by up to 33%, with individual-level decreases of at least 25%.
Public Health Impact: Increased access to MC strongly correlates with reduced opioid prescriptions and related deaths.
Survey Data: Patients reported experiences with MC, prescription changes, mental health, and use of substances like alcohol, THC, and CBD.
This poster, authored by Dr. Terel S. Newton, reviews current evidence on cannabinoids (CBD, THC) for traumatic spinal cord injuries, highlighting reduced opioid reliance, pain relief, and spasticity benefits, with research suggesting potential harm reduction and improved outcomes for chronic pain management.
Official Program Website: Florida Department of Health, Office of Medical Marijuana Use: https://knowthefactsmmj.com/ [ supply limit ]
Statutes and Regulations: Florida Statutes, Chapter 381, Section 381.986 - Medical use of marijuana: http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0300-0399/0381/Sections/0381.986.html
Official Program Website: Georgia Access to Medical Cannabis Commission: https://www.gmcc.ga.gov/
Informational Link: Georgia Department of Public Health - Low THC Oil Registry: https://dph.georgia.gov/low-thc-oil-registry
Here are 10 state medical cannabis programs with official and informational links for each, including Georgia and Florida as requested.
Florida's medical cannabis program is administered by the Office of Medical Marijuana Use (OMMU). Patients with a qualifying medical condition can receive a recommendation from a qualified physician to use medical marijuana.
Official Program Website: Florida Department of Health, Office of Medical Marijuana Use: https://knowthefactsmmj.com/
Statutes and Regulations: Florida Statutes, Chapter 381, Section 381.986 - Medical use of marijuana: http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0300-0399/0381/Sections/0381.986.html
Georgia has a "low THC oil" program for patients with specific qualifying conditions. The program allows for the possession of up to 20 fluid ounces of low THC oil, which must contain no more than 5% THC.
Official Program Website: Georgia Access to Medical Cannabis Commission: https://www.gmcc.ga.gov/
Informational Link: Georgia Department of Public Health - Low THC Oil Registry: https://dph.georgia.gov/low-thc-oil-registry
California was the first state to legalize medical cannabis in 1996. Its program is now well-established and integrated with its adult-use market, managed by the Department of Cannabis Control.
Official Program Website: California Department of Cannabis Control - Medical Cannabis: https://cannabis.ca.gov/patients/
Informational Link: California Department of Public Health - Medical Marijuana Identification Card Program: https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CHSI/Pages/MMICP.aspx
New York's medical cannabis program has expanded significantly in recent years, increasing the number of qualifying conditions and the types of products available to patients. The program is overseen by the Office of Cannabis Management.
Official Program Website: New York State Office of Cannabis Management - Medical Cannabis: https://cannabis.ny.gov/medical-cannabis
Patient and Caregiver Information: NY.gov - Medical Cannabis Program: https://www.ny.gov/services/apply-medical-marijuana-id-card
Pennsylvania's medical marijuana program serves patients with a range of serious medical conditions. The program is administered by the Department of Health.
Official Program Website: Pennsylvania Department of Health - Medical Marijuana Program: https://www.pa.gov/guides/pennsylvania-medical-marijuana-program/
Patient and Caregiver Resources: Pennsylvania Medical Marijuana Program - Patients & Caregivers: https://www.health.pa.gov/topics/programs/Medical%20Marijuana/Pages/Patients%20and%20Caregivers.aspx
A pioneer in both medical and recreational cannabis, Colorado's medical marijuana program remains a key part of its cannabis landscape. The program is managed by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment.
Official Program Website: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment - Medical Marijuana Registry: https://cdphe.colorado.gov/medical-marijuana-registry
Laws and Regulations: Colorado Department of Revenue, Marijuana Enforcement Division: https://sbg.colorado.gov/med
Illinois' Medical Cannabis Patient Program provides access to cannabis for patients with qualifying debilitating medical conditions. The program is administered by the Illinois Department of Public Health.
Official Program Website: Illinois Department of Public Health - Medical Cannabis Patient Program: https://dph.illinois.gov/topics-services/prevention-wellness/medical-cannabis.html
Program Information and Applications: Illinois Medical Cannabis Patient Program: https://medicalcannabispatients.illinois.gov/
The Ohio Medical Marijuana Control Program allows qualified patients to obtain and use medical cannabis upon the recommendation of a certified physician.
Official Program Website: Ohio Medical Marijuana Control Program: https://medicalmarijuana.ohio.gov/
Patient & Caregiver Information: State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy - Medical Marijuana: https://www.pharmacy.ohio.gov/audiences/patients-caregivers
The Maryland Cannabis Administration regulates the state's medical and adult-use cannabis programs, ensuring safe and effective access for registered patients.
Official Program Website: Maryland Cannabis Administration: https://mca.maryland.gov/
Patient Information: Maryland Cannabis Administration - Patients: https://mca.maryland.gov/Pages/patients.aspx
Arizona's medical marijuana program, overseen by the Department of Health Services, allows patients with specific medical conditions to obtain a registry identification card to purchase and use medical cannabis.
Official Program Website: Arizona Department of Health Services - Medical Marijuana: https://www.azdhs.gov/licensing/medical-marijuana/index.php
Qualifying Conditions and Patient Information: Arizona Department of Health Services - Medical Marijuana Patients: https://www.azdhs.gov/licensing/medical-marijuana/index.php#patients-debilitating-conditions
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR GEORGIA LOW-THC PROGRAM
TEREL NEWTON MD | TRULIEVE FL MEDICAL DIRECTOR
Ga Program - https://dph.georgia.gov/low-thc-oil-registry
1) Removal of “end stage” language
Georgia’s Low THC Oil Registry requires several conditions to be “severe or end stage” before patients qualify: cancer, ALS, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s, sickle cell, Alzheimer’s, AIDS, and peripheral neuropathy. Other conditions (e.g., intractable pain, PTSD, seizures) have no such qualifier.
Problem
This restriction denies earlier access even when evidence supports benefit in non–end stage disease:
Multiple sclerosis: Nabiximols and oral THC/CBD reduce spasticity and pain and improved sleep; many of these patients had moderate MS, not only end-stage [1].
Parkinson’s disease: Cannabis reduced tremor and dyskinesia in outpatient studies of moderate-stage patients [2].
Alzheimer’s disease: Low-dose THC reduced agitation and improved appetite in patients at mild-to-moderate stages [3].
HIV/AIDS: Cannabis reduced neuropathic pain in ambulatory patients, not just at terminal stages [4].
Policy recommendation
Eliminate “end stage” as a requirement.
Allow physicians to certify when the disease causes clinically significant symptoms or when standard therapies have failed.
This mirrors how “intractable pain” is already handled in Georgia law, and it aligns with states like New York, where physician discretion governs eligibility.
References for Section 1
[1] Chan, A., & Silván, C. V. (2022). Evidence-based Management of Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity With Nabiximols Oromucosal Spray in Clinical Practice: A 10-year Recap. Neurodegenerative Disease Management, 12(3), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.2217/nmt-2022-0002
[2] Lotan I et al. Cannabis (medical marijuana) treatment for motor and non-motor symptoms of Parkinson disease. Clin Neuropharmacol (2014). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24614667/
[3] Shelef A et al. Safety and efficacy of medical cannabis oil for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia: an open label study. J Alzheimers Dis (2016). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.g
[4] Abrams DI et al. Neurology (2007). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17296917/
2) Expansion of qualifying conditions
Georgia currently covers cancer, ALS, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, AIDS, peripheral neuropathy, epilepsy/seizures, Crohn’s disease, mitochondrial disease, autism spectrum disorder (with severity), Tourette’s syndrome (severe), PTSD (adults), intractable pain, and terminal illness.
Problem: This excludes conditions with strong or emerging evidence: fibromyalgia, ulcerative colitis, insomnia, opioid use disorder, and anxiety disorders.
Evidence:
Fibromyalgia: THC/CBD lowered symptom burden by 44% [1].
IBD: Cannabis reduced CDAI by >100 points; 45% remission [2].
Insomnia: THC/CBD spray shortened sleep latency by 30–40 minutes, added ~1.2 hrs/night [3].
Opioid use disorder: Cannabis laws linked to 17–31% lower opioid prescribing [4].
Anxiety: Observational studies show significant acute reduction in GAD-7 scores post-cannabis use [5].
Recommendation: Add these conditions, or adopt a physician-discretion model (as in FL/VT/MN) to allow certification for any conditions similar to the qualified conditions and any debilitating illness.
References for Section 2
[1] Habib G, Artul S. Clin Exp Rheumatol (2018). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29511842/
[2] Naftali T et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol (2013). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23648372/
[3] Suraev A et al. Sleep (2021). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34009777/
[4] Bradford AC, Bradford WD. JAMA Intern Med (2018). https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2676999
[5] Cuttler C et al. J Affect Disord (2018). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30197194/
3) THC cap adjustment
Georgia law caps THC content at 5%, which prevents therapeutic dosing.
Problem: Patients requiring more than trace THC must consume impractically large amounts, raising cost, adherence issues, and risk of illicit use.
Evidence: Nabiximols (1:1 THC:CBD) is typically titrated to 8–12 sprays/day (~20–30 mg THC), achieving 25–34% spasticity reduction [1]. Long-term extensions permitted up to 48 sprays/day (~130 mg THC) [2]. Cancer pain trials used 20–40 mg THC/day with significant analgesia [3]. Experts recommend regulating high-THC products with labeling and taxation instead of blanket low caps [4].
Recommendation: Raise or remove the 5% THC cap, adopting targeted regulation for ultra-high potency products.
References for Section 3
[1] Patti F et al. Expert Rev Neurother (2022). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9539865/
[2] Langford RM et al. J Neurol (2013). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3437528/
[3] Blake A et al. Ann Palliat Med (2022). https://apm.amegroups.org/article/view/16199/html
[4] Hall W et al. Addiction (2023). https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16135
4) Addition of product forms and routes (revised)
Georgia law currently permits low-THC oil, tinctures, transdermal patches, lotions, and capsules.
Problem: Forms like inhalation, vaporization, whole flower, and edibles are still prohibited. These forms can offer much faster onset (in minutes rather than hours), better options for acute symptom relief, and greater flexibility for patients who cannot swallow or want more precisely titratable doses.
Evidence:
Inhaled cannabis peaks in 3–10 minutes, useful for breakthrough pain, nausea, or spasticity [1,2].
Many patients prefer inhalation when available due to rapid onset and adjustability
In jurisdictions where inhalation is allowed, patient satisfaction and adherence improve, and some patients reduce their use of other symptom-relief medications.
Recommendation: Amend Georgia law to authorize inhalation and vaporization, and consider pilot authorization for whole flower or edibles with potency / safety regulation.
References for Section 4
[1] Chayasirisobhon S. Pharmacokinetics of cannabis. Neurol Int (2020). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8803256/
[2] Lucas CJ et al. Cannabinoid PK/PD. Clin Pharmacokinet (2018). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6177698/
5) Compassionate “Right-to-Try” access (corrected again)
Georgia law already lists Crohn’s disease, cancer, and epilepsy as qualifying conditions. The true policy gap is that the law has a closed list, leaving out other debilitating conditions with supporting evidence.
Problem: Patients with serious, refractory illnesses not on Georgia’s list such as fibromyalgia, ulcerative colitis, refractory migraine, anxiety disorders, and insomnia remain ineligible even when conventional therapies fail.
Evidence:
Fibromyalgia: THC/CBD improved symptom scores by 44% [1].
Ulcerative colitis: Pilot RCTs show cannabis improved disease activity and quality of life compared to placebo [2].
Refractory migraine/anxiety: Observational data show acute reductions in migraine intensity and significant decreases in GAD-7 anxiety scores after cannabis use [3].
Recommendation: Keep Georgia’s existing list intact but add a compassionate-use or physician-discretion pathway for conditions outside the list, aligning with models in New York and Minnesota.
References for Section 5
[1] Habib G, Artul S. Medical Cannabis for Fibromyalgia. Clin Exp Rheumatol (2018). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29461346/
[2] Naftali T et al. Cannabis is associated with clinical improvement in ulcerative colitis. Dig Dis Sci (2011). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33571293/
[3] Cuttler C et al. Short- and long-term effects of cannabis on headaches and migraine. J Pain (2019). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31715263/
6) Direct patient delivery
Georgia currently requires in-person dispensary pickup.
Problem: This requirement disproportionately burdens patients in rural areas, low-income communities, and those with limited mobility or disability. Many patients travel long distances, incur travel costs, or are unable to get to a dispensary at all. This contributes to healthcare disparities, especially for minority populations and those with chronic illness who already face barriers in accessing care.
Evidence:
In 2025 more than 25 U.S. states + Puerto Rico allow some form of medical cannabis delivery, enabling access especially for those living far from dispensaries or without reliable transportation.
In many of those states, delivery programs have been cited in patient surveys as reducing missed doses, reducing travel burden, and improving treatment adherence among rural or homebound populations. (While specific empirical data from Georgia isn’t yet published, national data shows patients in states with delivery laws report fewer disruptions in care. )
Recommendation: Georgia should authorize licensed home delivery by certified dispensaries or registered couriers under a regulated model. Key features should include:
Track-and-trace systems to ensure accountability.
Statewide availability, not limited only to urban areas.
Priority provisions for underserved communities (e.g., rural counties, low-income areas, elderly or disabled patients).
Reasonable delivery fees / subsidies to offset cost burdens.
References for Section 6
[1] “Cannabis Delivery Service by State: March 2025 Update.” CannabusinessPlans. 2025. https://cannabusinessplans.com/cannabis-delivery-service-by-state/ Cannabusiness Plans
[2] Ebling T., et al. “US State Recreational and Medical Cannabis Delivery Laws, 2024.” American Journal of Public Health. 2025. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307874 American Journal of Public Health
[3] “Here’s Every State Where Marijuana Delivery Is Allowed as of April 2025.” The Marijuana Herald. April 2025. https://themarijuanaherald.com/2025/04/heres-every-state-where-marijuana-delivery-is-allowed-as-of-april-2025/
Title Plant Medicine & AI in Cancer Care: Prevention, Treatment, and Future Directions │ Framing tradition + innovation in oncology
Introduction & Credentials Dr. Terel Newton, MD │ Trulieve Florida │ MIT & Stanford AI in Healthcare │ Plant medicine + AI transforming cancer outcomes
Agenda & Learning Goals Burden, disparities, prevention, standard treatments, plant medicine, AI, integrative future
Learning Objectives Global cancer stats, top 5 cancers, phytochemicals/cannabis, AI prediction & personalization
Global Cancer Burden 20M cases 2022 │ 9.7M deaths │ 35M cases, 18.5M deaths projected by 2050
US Cancer Burden 2M cases, 611K deaths (2024) │ Lifetime risk 40% men, 39% women │ 68% survival
Cancer Disparities Black women 40% higher breast cancer mortality │ Native Americans highest liver cancer │ Socioeconomic barriers worsen outcomes
Prevention Strategies Tobacco cessation, diet/activity, UV & carcinogen avoidance, alcohol moderation │ 30–50% cancers preventable
Vaccination HPV prevents >90% cervical cancers │ Hepatitis B vaccine prevents HCC │ EBV vaccines emerging
Screening Guidelines Breast, lung, colorectal, prostate protocols │ AI tailors intervals to risk
Breast Cancer & AI (MIRAI) 297K cases (2024) │ >90% survival early │ MIRAI reduces interval cancers 15–20%
FDA & Barzilay’s Mission FDA-approved AI breast risk tool │ Regina Barzilay drives AI-based prevention
Lung Cancer Challenges 238K cases │ LDCT ↓ mortality 20% │ AI improves nodule accuracy, cuts false positives 30%
Colorectal Cancer 152K cases │ Incidence ↓ 35% since 1990s │ AI boosts adenoma detection 15–25%
Prostate Cancer 299K cases │ PSA tailored by age/risk │ AI MRI fusion reduces overdiagnosis 25%
Pancreatic Cancer 66K cases │ 5% survival │ 80% late-stage │ AI biomarkers + MRI emerging
Standard of Care Breast, lung, colorectal, prostate, pancreatic evidence-based multimodal treatments
Transition to Plant Medicine Evidence-based phytochemicals relieve symptoms, support survivorship, enhance holistic care
Plant Medicine Overview Phytochemicals (curcumin, EGCG, resveratrol) │ Herbal extracts │ Cannabis (THC, CBD)
Curcumin Inhibits NF-κB/STAT3 │ RCTs ↑ chemo efficacy, ↓ toxicity │ Nanoformulations boost absorption
Cannabinoids Pain ↓ 75% │ Nausea ↓ 80% │ Sleep ↑ 65% │ AI optimizes dosing
EGCG (Green Tea) Blocks angiogenesis, EGFR, PI3K/AKT │ Population data: ↓ breast/gastric risk
Other Phytochemicals Apigenin anti-proliferative │ Resveratrol SIRT1/DNA repair │ Gingerols anti-nausea, GI anti-tumor
Plant Medicine Challenges Evidence gaps │ Drug interactions │ Quality control │ AI-driven solutions
AI Revolution AI + LLMs shift oncology to predictive, preventive, personalized care
AI in Imaging AI detects 20–40% missed breast cancers │ 85% accuracy breast risk │ 94% lung CT accuracy
Dr. Regina Barzilay AI pioneer │ Risk prediction from mammograms │ FDA-cleared clinical tools
Sybil (Lung AI) MIT + MGH │ Predicts lung cancer 6 yrs ahead │ 86% accuracy across populations
Personalized Oncology with AI Stanford 2025: 50M pathology images │ LLMs 90% therapy accuracy │ AI > TNM staging
AI in Research & Treatment Biomarker discovery │ Drug development acceleration │ Wearables + monitoring │ LLMs as copilots
AI Challenges Privacy/HIPAA │ Bias │ Black box trust │ Solutions: cloud, training, APIs, FDA
Future of Integrative Medicine Plant molecules │ Standard care │ AI/LLMs │ Equity │ Vision 2030 holistic model
Conclusion & Call to Action Prevention, plant medicine integration, AI adoption │ Expand access, train clinicians, innovate hubs
Rank │ State │ Population │ Registered Patients │ % of Pop │ THC Limit │ Notes
Florida │ 23.4M │ 925k │ 3.9% │ No cap │ Largest registry; full access
Pennsylvania │ 13.1M │ 442k │ 3.4% │ No cap │ Oils, tinctures, capsules, flower
California │ 39.0M │ ~400k* │ 1.0% │ No cap │ Voluntary registry; actual patients likely >1M
Oklahoma │ 4.1M │ 325k │ 7.9% │ No cap │ Broadest access; very high penetration
New York │ 19.9M │ 200k │ 1.0% │ No cap │ Registry shrank post-adult-use
Ohio │ 11.9M │ 152k │ 1.3% │ No cap │ Oils, capsules, flower; strict limits
Illinois │ 12.7M │ 134k │ 1.1% │ No cap │ Full program; flower, oils, edibles
Missouri │ 6.2M │ 121k │ 2.0% │ No cap │ Full program; high uptake
Maryland │ 6.3M │ 102k │ 1.6% │ No cap │ Strong program before adult-use
Arkansas │ 3.1M │ 101k │ 3.3% │ No cap │ Limited forms but high participation
Virginia │ 8.8M │ 100k │ 1.1% │ No cap │ Oils, tinctures, flower allowed
Massachusetts│ 7.1M │ 92k │ 1.3% │ No cap │ Registry shrank after rec legalization
Utah │ 3.5M │ 92k │ 2.6% │ No cap │ Oils, tinctures, capsules, limited flower
Arizona │ 7.6M │ 89k │ 1.2% │ No cap │ Registry fell post-rec, still strong market
Michigan │ 10.0M │ 79k │ 0.8% │ No cap │ Once >200k, dropped post-rec
Georgia │ 11.1M │ ~30k │ 0.3% │ ≤5% THC │ Only low-THC oil; no flower/edibles
Texas │ 30.5M │ ~55k │ 0.2% │ ≤1% THC │ Low-THC oil, tincture, capsule, gummy
✅ Key insights:
Oklahoma has the highest penetration (7.9%). Florida has the largest raw number (925k).
Georgia & Texas stand out for explicit % THC caps (5% and 1%). Most other large programs have no THC cap, focusing instead on regulating dose/form.
United States │ 335M │ 3.6M │ 1.1% │ NYC 20M / 8.9M, LA 13M / 3.8M, Chicago 9.6M / 2.7M, Houston 7.3M / 2.3M │ Registry required; actual closer to 4M+
Germany │ 84M │ 800k │ 1.0% │ Berlin 6.3M / 3.9M, Rhine-Ruhr 11.3M / Essen 0.6M, Munich 6.0M / 1.5M, Hamburg 5.1M / 1.9M │ Insurance reimbursements undercount; est. 800k–1M+
Brazil │ 216M │ 670k │ 0.3% │ São Paulo 22.6M / 11.5M, Rio 13.2M / 6.7M, Brasília 4.7M / 3.0M, Belo Horizonte 5.1M / 2.3M │ ANVISA approvals; some private access not tracked
Australia │ 27M │ 650k │ 2.4% │ Sydney 5.3M / 5.3M, Melbourne 5.2M / 5.1M, Brisbane 2.8M / 2.5M, Perth 2.2M / 2.2M │ Registry + doctor prescribing; likely undercounts actual daily users
Canada │ 41M │ 161k │ 0.4% │ Toronto 6.7M / 2.9M, Montreal 4.4M / 1.8M, Vancouver 2.6M / 0.63M, Calgary 1.6M / 1.3M │ Registry shrank post-rec; real patients 300–400k
Israel │ 9.8M │ 138k │ 1.4% │ Tel Aviv 4.0M / 0.46M, Jerusalem 1.3M / 0.98M, Haifa 1.1M / 0.28M, Beersheba 0.56M / 0.22M │ Registry tracks nearly all patients
United Kingdom │ 68M │ 63k │ 0.1% │ London 14.3M / 8.9M, Birmingham 3.8M / 1.1M, Manchester 3.2M / 0.55M, Glasgow 1.7M / 0.63M │ Mostly private clinics; many patients outside registry
Poland │ 38M │ 44k │ 0.1% │ Warsaw 3.1M / 1.9M, Kraków 1.7M / 0.8M, Łódź 1.1M / 0.7M, Wrocław 1.0M / 0.65M │ Import pharmacy model; est. 40–90k users
Italy │ 59M │ 20k │ 0.03% │ Rome 4.3M / 2.7M, Milan 4.3M / 1.4M, Naples 3.1M / 0.9M, Turin 2.3M / 0.8M │ Army-grown supply + imports; registry incomplete
Netherlands │ 18M │ 12k │ 0.07% │ Randstad 8.2M / (Amsterdam 0.9M), Amsterdam 2.5M / 0.9M, Rotterdam 2.3M / 0.65M, The Hague 1.1M / 0.55M │ Registry declining; many patients buy recreationally
Denmark │ 5.9M │ 3k │ 0.05% │ Copenhagen 2.0M / 0.65M, Aarhus 0.38M / 0.28M, Odense 0.20M / 0.18M, Aalborg 0.21M / 0.12M │ Pilot program; registry undercounts imports and magistral prep
Czech Republic │ 10.9M │ 5k │ 0.05% │ Prague 2.7M / 1.3M, Brno 0.8M / 0.4M, Ostrava 0.7M / 0.3M, Pilsen 0.6M / 0.17M │ Insurance-covered registry; small but growing
Switzerland │ 8.9M │ ~fewk │ <0.05% │ Zurich 1.6M / 0.43M, Geneva 1.0M / 0.21M, Basel 0.9M / 0.18M, Bern 0.5M / 0.13M │ Access liberalized 2022; registry small, many via rec pilot
Portugal │ 10.5M │ ~fewk │ <0.05% │ Lisbon 2.8M / 0.55M, Porto 1.7M / 0.23M, Braga 0.6M / 0.18M, Coimbra 0.4M / 0.14M │ Exports huge; domestic patients under-reported
Malta │ 0.54M │ ~hund │ <0.05% │ Valletta metro 0.25M / 0.06M │ Registry tiny; symbolic program, many patients import privately
TEREL NEWTON MD | TRULIEVE FL MEDICAL DIRECTOR
Ga Program - https://dph.georgia.gov/low-thc-oil-registry
Problem
Georgia’s Low THC Oil Registry requires several conditions to be “severe or end stage” before patients qualify: cancer, ALS, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s, sickle cell, Alzheimer’s, AIDS, and peripheral neuropathy. Other conditions (e.g., intractable pain, PTSD, seizures) have no such qualifier.
This restriction denies earlier access even when evidence supports benefit in non–end stage disease:
Multiple sclerosis: Nabiximols and oral THC/CBD reduce spasticity and pain and improved sleep; many of these patients had moderate MS, not only end-stage.
Parkinson’s disease: Cannabis reduced tremor and dyskinesia in outpatient studies of moderate-stage patients.
Alzheimer’s disease: Low-dose THC reduced agitation and improved appetite in patients at mild-to-moderate stages.
HIV/AIDS: Cannabis reduced neuropathic pain in ambulatory patients, not just at terminal stages.
Policy recommendation
Eliminate “end stage” as a requirement.
Allow physicians to certify when the disease causes clinically significant symptoms or when standard therapies have failed.
This mirrors how “intractable pain” is already handled in Georgia law, and it aligns with states like New York, where physician discretion governs eligibility.
Problem
Georgia currently covers cancer, ALS, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, AIDS, peripheral neuropathy, epilepsy/seizures, Crohn’s disease, mitochondrial disease, autism spectrum disorder (with severity), Tourette’s syndrome (severe), PTSD (adults), intractable pain, and terminal illness.
This excludes conditions with strong or emerging evidence: fibromyalgia, ulcerative colitis, insomnia, opioid use disorder, and anxiety disorders.
Evidence
Fibromyalgia: THC/CBD lowered symptom burden by 44%.
IBD: Cannabis reduced CDAI by >100 points; 45% remission.
Insomnia: THC/CBD spray shortened sleep latency by 30–40 minutes, added ~1.2 hrs/night.
Opioid use disorder: Cannabis laws linked to 17–31% lower opioid prescribing.
Anxiety: Observational studies show significant acute reduction in GAD-7 scores post-cannabis use.
Recommendation
Add these conditions, or adopt a physician-discretion model (as in FL/VT/MN) to allow certification for any conditions similar to the qualified conditions and any debilitating illness.
Problem
Georgia law caps THC content at 5%, which prevents therapeutic dosing. Patients requiring more than trace THC must consume impractically large amounts, raising cost, adherence issues, and risk of illicit use.
Evidence
Nabiximols (1:1 THC:CBD) is typically titrated to 8–12 sprays/day (~20–30 mg THC), achieving 25–34% spasticity reduction.
Long-term extensions permitted up to 48 sprays/day (~130 mg THC).
Cancer pain trials used 20–40 mg THC/day with significant analgesia.
Experts recommend regulating high-THC products with labeling and taxation instead of blanket low caps.
Recommendation
Raise or remove the 5% THC cap, adopting targeted regulation for ultra-high potency products.
Problem
Georgia law currently permits low-THC oil, tinctures, transdermal patches, lotions, and capsules.
Forms like inhalation, vaporization, whole flower, and edibles are still prohibited. These forms can offer much faster onset (in minutes rather than hours), better options for acute symptom relief, and greater flexibility for patients who cannot swallow or want more precisely titratable doses.
Evidence
Inhaled cannabis peaks in 3–10 minutes, useful for breakthrough pain, nausea, or spasticity.
Many patients prefer inhalation when available due to rapid onset and adjustability.
In jurisdictions where inhalation is allowed, patient satisfaction and adherence improve, and some patients reduce their use of other symptom-relief medications.
Recommendation
Amend Georgia law to authorize inhalation and vaporization, and consider pilot authorization for whole flower or edibles with potency / safety regulation.
Problem
Georgia law has a closed list of qualifying conditions, leaving out other debilitating conditions with supporting evidence. Patients with serious, refractory illnesses such as fibromyalgia, ulcerative colitis, refractory migraine, anxiety disorders, and insomnia remain ineligible even when conventional therapies fail.
Evidence
Fibromyalgia: THC/CBD improved symptom scores by 44%.
Ulcerative colitis: Pilot RCTs show cannabis improved disease activity and quality of life compared to placebo.
Refractory migraine/anxiety: Observational data show acute reductions in migraine intensity and significant decreases in GAD-7 anxiety scores after cannabis use.
Recommendation
Keep Georgia’s existing list intact but add a compassionate-use or physician-discretion pathway for conditions outside the list, aligning with models in New York and Minnesota.
Problem
Georgia currently requires in-person dispensary pickup. This disproportionately burdens patients in rural areas, low-income communities, and those with limited mobility or disability. Many patients travel long distances, incur travel costs, or are unable to get to a dispensary at all. This contributes to healthcare disparities, especially for minority populations and those with chronic illness who already face barriers in accessing care.
Evidence
In 2025, more than 25 U.S. states + Puerto Rico allow some form of medical cannabis delivery, enabling access especially for those living far from dispensaries or without reliable transportation.
In many of those states, delivery programs have been cited in patient surveys as reducing missed doses, reducing travel burden, and improving treatment adherence among rural or homebound populations.
National data shows patients in states with delivery laws report fewer disruptions in care.
Recommendation
Georgia should authorize licensed home delivery by certified dispensaries or registered couriers under a regulated model. Key features should include:
Track-and-trace systems to ensure accountability
Statewide availability, not limited only to urban areas
Priority provisions for underserved communities (e.g., rural counties, low-income areas, elderly or disabled patients)
Reasonable delivery fees / subsidies to offset cost burdens
Legal Rules
Max THC ≤ 5% by weight
CBD ≥ THC required
Max 20 fl oz oil possession
Allowed: oils, tinctures, capsules, troches, topicals, nasal sprays
Not allowed: flower, vape, smoking, high-THC edibles
Capsules
Momenta 1:1 Indica ~10 mg total (≈5 mg THC + 5 mg CBD)
Momenta 1:20 ~10 mg total (≈9.6 mg THC + 0.5 mg CBD)
Indica, Hybrid terpene profiles
Tinctures
Momenta 300 mg bottles (1:20, 1:30, 1:1 ratios)
Momenta micro-dose 20 mg flavored drops (Indica/Sativa/Hybrid)
Troches (Lozenges)
Flavors: Watermelon, Peach, Strawberry, Raspberry
Strength: 10 mg or 20 mg each (≈5–19 mg THC + trace CBD)
Indica, Sativa, Hybrid
Topicals
Momenta Lotion 250 mg (1:1 ratio ≈125 mg THC + 125 mg CBD)
Nasal Spray
Momenta Spray 1500 mg (5% THC; ≈5 mg per spray)
Unavailable in GA
Flower, vape, gummies, chocolates
Legal Rules
High-THC products (flower up to ~25% THC, concentrates ~70–85% THC)
Allowed: flower, vape, tinctures, capsules, edibles, topicals, troches
Physician sets daily dose & route
Capsules
THC Capsules (10 mg or 50 mg THC; Indica/Sativa/Hybrid)
Ratio Capsules (1:1, ~25 mg THC + 25 mg CBD each)
Tinctures
Standard tinctures: 500–600 mg bottles (high THC or 1:1)
RSO tincture: up to 1200 mg THC (20:1 ratio)
Strain-specific options (Remedy, 9lb Hammer, etc.)
Edibles
Sweet Talk Gummies (10 mg THC each; also 1:1 CBD:THC Peach flavor)
Bhang Chocolate Bars (100 mg THC; milk/dark; sometimes 1:1)
Other edibles (cookies, brownies, seasonal items)
Topicals
Creams & gels (250 mg THC or 1:1 ratio)
Smaller 100 mg ratio jars
Some transdermal patches
Troches
RSO Troches (10 mg THC each; Indica/Sativa/Hybrid flavors like Strawberry, White Grape)
Nasal Spray
Cannatol Rescue Spray 1500 mg (20:1 THC:CBD; ~5 mg per spray)
Flower
TruFlower strains (Blue Dream, 9lb Hammer, Black Tuna, etc.)
Potency: ~15–25% THC
Sold in 3.5 g jars, ground flower, pre-rolls
Vapes
TruPOD cartridges (~70–85% THC; strain-specific, CDT)
510 carts (0.5–1 g; distillate or live resin)
Disposable vape pens
THC cap → GA: ≤5% THC; FL: full potency (flower 20–25%, vapes 70–85%)
Product forms → GA: oils, capsules, troches, topicals, sprays; FL: wide variety including flower, vapes, edibles
Potency → GA: mild dosing; FL: strong/high-dose options
Choice → GA limited, CBD-heavy; FL diverse, THC-rich
A stark contrast in medical cannabis regulations between Georgia and Florida dictates a vastly different product landscape for patients at Trulieve dispensaries in each state. While Floridians have access to a wide array of high-THC products, Georgians are limited to low-THC options in specific formats, highlighting the pivotal role state laws play in patient access and treatment options.
The fundamental difference lies in the legal definition of medical cannabis in each state. Georgia's highly restrictive program only permits the sale of "low THC oil," defined as containing no more than 5% tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) by weight. In sharp contrast, Florida's more mature medical marijuana program allows for a diverse range of products with no cap on THC potency for most forms, aside from specific dosage restrictions.
Here's a detailed comparison of Trulieve's product offerings, now with specific potency examples:
Georgia: Not Available. The sale of smokable cannabis flower is strictly prohibited under Georgia's low-THC law.
Florida: Widely Available. Trulieve in Florida offers a robust selection of high-THC cannabis flower.
Specific Potency Examples:
Roll One "Chem Dawg" Flower: ~24.9% THC
Cultivar Collection "Horchata" Flower: ~28.5% THC
TruFlower "Kush Mints": ~29.9% THC
Georgia: Not Available. Edible cannabis products are illegal for medical use in Georgia.
Florida: Extensive Options. State regulations cap single servings at 10mg of THC and packages at 200mg of THC.
Specific Potency Examples:
Love's Oven Red Velvet Cookies: 10mg THC per cookie (100mg total per package)
Momenta Gels (Indica): 10mg THC per gel (100mg total per package)
Sweet Talk Sour Strawberry Gummies: 10mg THC per gummy (100mg total per package)
Georgia: Not Available. Inhaled cannabis products, including vape cartridges, are not permitted.
Florida: Broad Selection. Vape products are a popular category with high THC concentrations.
Specific Potency Examples:
TruPod "Pineapple Express" 0.5g Cartridge: ~90.6% THC
Alchemy "Motorbreath" 0.5g AIO Vape Pen: ~83.5% THC
Muse "Stardawg" 1g Cartridge: ~84.2% THC
Georgia: Not Available. Concentrated cannabis products are illegal under the state's low-THC restrictions.
Florida: Diverse Offerings. Trulieve in Florida carries a wide assortment of high-potency concentrates.
Specific Potency Examples:
Muse Live Budder "Cake Face": ~74.5% THC
Blue River Live Rosin "Rebel Sour 2.0": ~72.1% THC
Muse Shatter "Puck Yeah": ~76.9% THC
Georgia: Available (Low-THC). A primary product offering, tinctures are formulated to comply with the 5% THC cap and focus on specific cannabinoid ratios.
Specific Potency Examples:
Trulieve 1:1 Tincture: Contains 150mg CBD & 150mg THC per 30mL bottle.
Trulieve 1:20 Tincture: Contains 300mg CBD & 15mg THC per 30mL bottle.
Florida: Available (High and Low-THC). Offers a broader range of potencies for more customizable dosing.
Specific Potency Examples:
TruTincture Drops (Indica): Contains 500mg THC per 30mL bottle (~16.7mg THC per 1mL dropper).
Trulieve 1:1 Tincture: Contains 250mg CBD & 250mg THC per 30mL bottle.
Trulieve 9:1 Tincture: Contains 450mg CBD & 50mg THC per 30mL bottle.
Georgia: Available (Low-THC). Provides a discreet and precisely dosed low-THC option.
Specific Potency Examples:
Trulieve 1:1 Capsules: 5mg CBD & 5mg THC per capsule (30 count).
Trulieve 10mg THC Capsules: 10mg THC per capsule (30 count), derived from low-THC cannabis.
Florida: Available (High and Low-THC). A wider spectrum of capsule potencies is available.
Specific Potency Examples:
Trulieve THC Capsules: 10mg THC per capsule (30 count).
Trulieve CBD Capsules: 10mg CBD per capsule (30 count).
Momenta RSO Capsules: ~33mg THC per capsule (30 count).
Georgia: Available (Low-THC). Designed for localized relief without psychoactive effects.
Specific Potency Examples:
Momenta 1:1 Transdermal Cream: Contains 250mg CBD & 250mg THC per container.
Momenta Soothe Topical Lotion: Contains 500mg CBD & 25mg THC per container.
Florida: Available (High and Low-THC). Allows for topicals with higher cannabinoid content.
Specific Potency Examples:
TruDerm 1:1 Transdermal Cream: Contains 125mg CBD & 125mg THC per container.
Sweet Talk CBD Body Balm: Contains 500mg of CBD and trace amounts of THC.
Avexia Pain Relief Cream (THC-dominant): Varies, but can contain up to 500mg of THC per container.
Below is an outline of states with explicit THC percentage caps for medical cannabis products, focusing on flower and concentrate limits where applicable, as well as relevant details about program restrictions and context. As of September 2025, 40 U.S. states plus the District of Columbia have legalized medical cannabis, with varying levels of restrictions. THC caps are most common in states with limited or "low-THC" programs, typically designed for high-CBD, low-psychoactive products for conditions like epilepsy. Comprehensive medical programs (38 states + DC) generally allow higher or unlimited THC levels, though some impose potency caps for safety or regulatory purposes. States without explicit THC percentage caps, such as California, Colorado, Washington, Oregon, and Michigan, rely on market-driven potencies (often up to 30-35% for flower) or total THC purchase limits (e.g., grams of THC per month).
Alabama
THC Cap: ≤ 0.3% THC (oils only)
Notes: Low-THC program; no smokable flower allowed; restricted to specific conditions like epilepsy.
Georgia
THC Cap: ≤ 5% THC (low-THC oil only)
Notes: Limited to epilepsy treatment; no smokable flower permitted.
Indiana
THC Cap: ≤ 0.3% THC (CBD oil only)
Notes: Very restrictive program focused on epilepsy; no smokable flower.
North Carolina
THC Cap: ≤ 0.9% THC (CBD oil only)
Notes: Low-THC program for seizure disorders; no smokable flower.
South Carolina
THC Cap: ≤ 0.9% THC (CBD oil only)
Notes: Limited program for epilepsy; no smokable flower.
Tennessee
THC Cap: ≤ 0.9% THC (CBD oil only)
Notes: Very restrictive; no smokable flower; focused on CBD-dominant products.
Texas
THC Cap: ≤ 1% THC (low-THC oil; recently expanded to 10 mg/serving, 1g/package)
Notes: Comprehensive low-THC program; no smokable flower; expanded limits in 2025.
Wisconsin
THC Cap: ≤ 0.3% THC (CBD oil only)
Notes: Low-THC program for seizures; no smokable flower.
Wyoming
THC Cap: ≤ 0.3% THC (CBD oil only)
Notes: Minimal program; focused on CBD for specific conditions; no smokable flower.
Florida
THC Cap:
Edibles: 600 mg total THC per package
Vapes: 3,500 mg total THC per package (effective ~35% for flower if vaporized)
Notes: Comprehensive program; flower limited to 0.15 oz (4.25g) at 35% potency; per-product caps to regulate consumption.
Iowa
THC Cap: ≤ 4.5 grams total THC per month (effective ~0.5-1% if spread across products)
Notes: 3 oz flower limit; low overall THC allowance due to restrictive program.
Kentucky
THC Cap:
Flower: 35%
Concentrates: 70%
Edibles: 10 mg per serving
Notes: Medical program launched in 2025; caps set to balance access and safety.
Louisiana
THC Cap:
Flower: 20%
Concentrates: 60%
Notes: Smoking allowed but with strict potency limits to control psychoactive effects.
Mississippi
THC Cap:
Flower: 30%
Concentrates: 60%
Notes: Daily purchase limits of 3.5 oz flower or 1g concentrate; comprehensive but regulated.
Utah
THC Cap:
Flower: 20% (if allowed)
Edibles: 5 mg per serving
Notes: Raw flower was banned until recently; strict edible limits; program expanding cautiously.
States: Approximately 25 states, including Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia.
Details:
No explicit caps on THC percentage for flower or concentrates.
Rely on total THC milligram limits (e.g., Alaska: 5,600 mg total THC across products) or purchase limits rather than potency restrictions.
Market-driven potencies often reach 30-35% for flower in these states.
Low-THC States: 10 states (Alabama, Georgia, Indiana, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Wisconsin, Wyoming) focus on CBD-dominant products with THC caps ranging from 0.3% to 5%, primarily for oils and specific conditions like epilepsy.
Comprehensive States with Caps: 5 states (Florida, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi) impose potency limits within broader programs to ensure safety and prevent overconsumption.
Trends:
THC caps aim to balance therapeutic access with public safety concerns, though critics argue they restrict patient options.
Texas raised its THC limits in 2025, indicating a potential trend toward loosening restrictions.
Nebraska legalized limited medical cannabis via a 2024 ballot initiative, but operational caps are not yet defined (focus on low-THC products).
Territories: Territories like Guam have comprehensive programs without THC percentage caps, but this outline focuses on U.S. states.
Sources: For the most current information, refer to state health department websites or legislative summaries (e.g., NCSL.org), as regulations evolve frequently.
381.986 Medical use of marijuana.—
(1) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this section, the term:
(a) “Attractive to children” means the use of any image or words designed or likely to appeal to persons younger than 18 years of age, including, but not limited to, cartoons, toys, animals, food, or depictions of persons younger than 18 years of age; any other likeness to images, characters, or phrases that are popularly used to advertise to persons younger than 18 years of age; or any reasonable likeness to commercially available candy.
(b) “Caregiver” means a resident of this state who has agreed to assist with a qualified patient’s medical use of marijuana, has a caregiver identification card, and meets the requirements of subsection (6).
(c) “Chronic nonmalignant pain” means pain that is caused by a qualifying medical condition or that originates from a qualifying medical condition and persists beyond the usual course of that qualifying medical condition.
(d) “Close relative” means a spouse, parent, sibling, grandparent, child, or grandchild, whether related by whole or half blood, by marriage, or by adoption.
(e) “Edibles” means commercially produced food items made with marijuana oil, but no other form of marijuana, that are produced and dispensed by a medical marijuana treatment center.
(f) “Low-THC cannabis” means a plant of the genus Cannabis, the dried flowers of which contain 0.8 percent or less of tetrahydrocannabinol and more than 10 percent of cannabidiol weight for weight; the seeds thereof; the resin extracted from any part of such plant; or any compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such plant or its seeds or resin that is dispensed from a medical marijuana treatment center.
(g) “Marijuana” means all parts of any plant of the genus Cannabis, whether growing or not; the seeds thereof; the resin extracted from any part of the plant; and every compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of the plant or its seeds or resin, including low-THC cannabis, which are dispensed from a medical marijuana treatment center for medical use by a qualified patient.
(h) “Marijuana delivery device” means an object used, intended for use, or designed for use in preparing, storing, ingesting, inhaling, or otherwise introducing marijuana into the human body, and which is dispensed from a medical marijuana treatment center for medical use by a qualified patient, except that delivery devices intended for the medical use of marijuana by smoking need not be dispensed from a medical marijuana treatment center in order to qualify as marijuana delivery devices.
(i) “Marijuana testing laboratory” means a facility that collects and analyzes marijuana samples from a medical marijuana treatment center and has been certified by the department pursuant to s. 381.988.
(j) “Medical director” means a person who holds an active, unrestricted license as an allopathic physician under chapter 458 or osteopathic physician under chapter 459 and is in compliance with the requirements of paragraph (3)(c).
(k) “Medical use” means the acquisition, possession, use, delivery, transfer, or administration of marijuana authorized by a physician certification. The term does not include:
1. Possession, use, or administration of marijuana that was not purchased or acquired from a medical marijuana treatment center.
2. Possession, use, or administration of marijuana in the form of commercially produced food items other than edibles or of marijuana seeds.
3. Use or administration of any form or amount of marijuana in a manner that is inconsistent with the qualified physician’s directions or physician certification.
4. Transfer of marijuana to a person other than the qualified patient for whom it was authorized or the qualified patient’s caregiver on behalf of the qualified patient.
5. Use or administration of marijuana in the following locations:
a. On any form of public transportation, except for low-THC cannabis not in a form for smoking.
b. In any public place, except for low-THC cannabis not in a form for smoking.
c. In a qualified patient’s place of employment, except when permitted by his or her employer.
d. In a state correctional institution, as defined in s. 944.02, or a correctional institution, as defined in s. 944.241.
e. On the grounds of a preschool, primary school, or secondary school, except as provided in s. 1006.062.
f. In a school bus, a vehicle, an aircraft, or a motorboat, except for low-THC cannabis not in a form for smoking.
6. The smoking of marijuana in an enclosed indoor workplace as defined in s. 386.203(5).
(l) “Physician certification” means a qualified physician’s authorization for a qualified patient to receive marijuana and a marijuana delivery device from a medical marijuana treatment center.
(m) “Qualified patient” means a resident of this state who has been added to the medical marijuana use registry by a qualified physician to receive marijuana or a marijuana delivery device for a medical use and who has a qualified patient identification card.
(n) “Qualified physician” means a person who holds an active, unrestricted license as an allopathic physician under chapter 458 or as an osteopathic physician under chapter 459 and is in compliance with the physician education requirements of subsection (3).
(o) “Smoking” means burning or igniting a substance and inhaling the smoke.
(p) “Terminal condition” means a progressive disease or medical or surgical condition that causes significant functional impairment, is not considered by a treating physician to be reversible without the administration of life-sustaining procedures, and will result in death within 1 year after diagnosis if the condition runs its normal course.
(2) QUALIFYING MEDICAL CONDITIONS.—A patient must be diagnosed with at least one of the following conditions to qualify to receive marijuana or a marijuana delivery device:
(a) Cancer.
(b) Epilepsy.
(c) Glaucoma.
(d) Positive status for human immunodeficiency virus.
(e) Acquired immune deficiency syndrome.
(f) Posttraumatic stress disorder.
(g) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
(h) Crohn’s disease.
(i) Parkinson’s disease.
(j) Multiple sclerosis.
(k) Medical conditions of the same kind or class as or comparable to those enumerated in paragraphs (a)-(j).
(l) A terminal condition diagnosed by a physician other than the qualified physician issuing the physician certification.
(m) Chronic nonmalignant pain.
(3) QUALIFIED PHYSICIANS AND MEDICAL DIRECTORS.—
(a) Before being approved as a qualified physician and before each license renewal, a physician must successfully complete a 2-hour course and subsequent examination offered by the Florida Medical Association or the Florida Osteopathic Medical Association which encompass the requirements of this section and any rules adopted hereunder. The course and examination must be administered at least annually and may be offered in a distance learning format, including an electronic, online format that is available upon request. The price of the course may not exceed $500.
(b) A qualified physician may not be employed by, or have any direct or indirect economic interest in, a medical marijuana treatment center or marijuana testing laboratory.
(c) Before being employed as a medical director and before each license renewal, a medical director must successfully complete a 2-hour course and subsequent examination offered by the Florida Medical Association or the Florida Osteopathic Medical Association which encompass the requirements of this section and any rules adopted hereunder. The course and examination must be administered at least annually and may be offered in a distance learning format, including an electronic, online format that is available upon request. The price of the course may not exceed $500.
(4) PHYSICIAN CERTIFICATION.—
(a) A qualified physician may issue a physician certification only if the qualified physician:
1. Conducted an examination of the patient and a full assessment of the medical history of the patient. Before issuing an initial certification to a patient, the qualified physician must conduct an in-person physical examination of the patient. For certification renewals, a qualified physician who has issued a certification to a patient after conducting an in-person physical examination may conduct subsequent examinations of that patient through telehealth as defined in s. 456.47. For the purposes of this subparagraph, the term “in-person physical examination” means an examination conducted by a qualified physician while the physician is physically present in the same room as the patient.
2. Diagnosed the patient with at least one qualifying medical condition.
3. Determined that the medical use of marijuana would likely outweigh the potential health risks for the patient, and such determination must be documented in the patient’s medical record. If a patient is younger than 18 years of age, a second physician must concur with this determination, and such concurrence must be documented in the patient’s medical record.
4. Determined whether the patient is pregnant and documented such determination in the patient’s medical record. A physician may not issue a physician certification, except for low-THC cannabis, to a patient who is pregnant.
5. Reviewed the patient’s controlled drug prescription history in the prescription drug monitoring program database established pursuant to s. 893.055.
6. Reviews the medical marijuana use registry and confirmed that the patient does not have an active physician certification from another qualified physician.
7. Registers as the issuer of the physician certification for the named qualified patient on the medical marijuana use registry in an electronic manner determined by the department, and:
a. Enters into the registry the contents of the physician certification, including the patient’s qualifying condition and the dosage not to exceed the daily dose amount determined by the department, the amount and forms of marijuana authorized for the patient, and any types of marijuana delivery devices needed by the patient for the medical use of marijuana.
b. Updates the registry within 7 days after any change is made to the original physician certification to reflect such change.
c. Deactivates the registration of the qualified patient and the patient’s caregiver when the physician no longer recommends the medical use of marijuana for the patient.
8. Obtains the voluntary and informed written consent of the patient for medical use of marijuana each time the qualified physician issues a physician certification for the patient, which shall be maintained in the patient’s medical record. The patient, or the patient’s parent or legal guardian if the patient is a minor, must sign the informed consent acknowledging that the qualified physician has sufficiently explained its content. The qualified physician must use a standardized informed consent form adopted in rule by the Board of Medicine and the Board of Osteopathic Medicine, which must include, at a minimum, information related to:
a. The Federal Government’s classification of marijuana as a Schedule I controlled substance.
b. The approval and oversight status of marijuana by the Food and Drug Administration.
c. The current state of research on the efficacy of marijuana to treat the qualifying conditions set forth in this section.
d. The potential for addiction.
e. The potential effect that marijuana may have on a patient’s coordination, motor skills, and cognition, including a warning against operating heavy machinery, operating a motor vehicle, or engaging in activities that require a person to be alert or respond quickly.
f. The potential side effects of marijuana use, including the negative health risks associated with smoking marijuana.
g. The risks, benefits, and drug interactions of marijuana.
h. That the patient’s deidentified health information contained in the physician certification and medical marijuana use registry may be used for research purposes.
(b) If a qualified physician issues a physician certification for a qualified patient diagnosed with a qualifying medical condition pursuant to paragraph (2)(k), the physician must submit the following to the applicable board within 14 days after issuing the physician certification:
1. Documentation supporting the qualified physician’s opinion that the medical condition is of the same kind or class as the conditions in paragraphs (2)(a)-(j).
2. Documentation that establishes the efficacy of marijuana as treatment for the condition.
3. Documentation supporting the qualified physician’s opinion that the benefits of medical use of marijuana would likely outweigh the potential health risks for the patient.
4. Any other documentation as required by board rule.
The department must submit such documentation to the Consortium for Medical Marijuana Clinical Outcomes Research established pursuant to s. 1004.4351.
(c) If a qualified physician determines that smoking is an appropriate route of administration for a qualified patient, other than a patient diagnosed with a terminal condition, the qualified physician must submit the following documentation to the applicable board:
1. A list of other routes of administration, if any, certified by a qualified physician that the patient has tried, the length of time the patient used such routes of administration, and an assessment of the effectiveness of those routes of administration in treating the qualified patient’s qualifying condition.
2. Research documenting the effectiveness of smoking as a route of administration to treat similarly situated patients with the same qualifying condition as the qualified patient.
3. A statement signed by the qualified physician documenting the qualified physician’s opinion that the benefits of smoking marijuana for medical use outweigh the risks for the qualified patient.
(d) A qualified physician may not issue a physician certification for marijuana in a form for smoking to a patient under 18 years of age unless the patient is diagnosed with a terminal condition, the qualified physician determines that smoking is the most effective route of administration for the patient, and a second physician who is a board-certified pediatrician concurs with such determination. Such determination and concurrence must be documented in the patient’s medical record and in the medical marijuana use registry. The certifying physician must obtain the written informed consent of such patient’s parent or legal guardian before issuing a physician certification to the patient for marijuana in a form for smoking. The qualified physician must use a standardized informed consent form adopted in rule by the Board of Medicine and the Board of Osteopathic Medicine which must include information concerning the negative health effects of smoking marijuana on persons under 18 years of age and an acknowledgment that the qualified physician has sufficiently explained the contents of the form.
(e) The Board of Medicine and the Board of Osteopathic Medicine shall review the documentation submitted pursuant to paragraph (c) and shall each, by July 1, 2021, adopt by rule practice standards for the certification of smoking as a route of administration.
(f) A qualified physician may not issue a physician certification for more than three 70-day supply limits of marijuana or more than six 35-day supply limits of marijuana in a form for smoking. The department shall quantify by rule a daily dose amount with equivalent dose amounts for each allowable form of marijuana dispensed by a medical marijuana treatment center. The department shall use the daily dose amount to calculate a 70-day supply.
1. A qualified physician may request an exception to the daily dose amount limit, the 35-day supply limit of marijuana in a form for smoking, and the 4-ounce possession limit of marijuana in a form for smoking established in paragraph (14)(a). The request shall be made electronically on a form adopted by the department in rule and must include, at a minimum:
a. The qualified patient’s qualifying medical condition.
b. The dosage and route of administration that was insufficient to provide relief to the qualified patient.
c. A description of how the patient will benefit from an increased amount.
d. The minimum daily dose amount of marijuana that would be sufficient for the treatment of the qualified patient’s qualifying medical condition.
2. A qualified physician must provide the qualified patient’s records upon the request of the department.
3. The department shall approve or disapprove the request within 14 days after receipt of the complete documentation required by this paragraph. The request shall be deemed approved if the department fails to act within this time period.
(g) A qualified physician must evaluate an existing qualified patient at least once every 30 weeks before issuing a new physician certification. A qualified physician who has issued a certification to the patient after conducting an in-person physical examination as defined in subparagraph (a)1. may conduct the evaluation through telehealth as defined in s. 456.47. A physician must:
1. Determine if the patient still meets the requirements to be issued a physician certification under paragraph (a).
2. Identify and document in the qualified patient’s medical records whether the qualified patient experienced either of the following related to the medical use of marijuana:
a. An adverse drug interaction with any prescription or nonprescription medication; or
b. A reduction in the use of, or dependence on, other types of controlled substances as defined in s. 893.02.
3. Submit a report with the findings required pursuant to subparagraph 2. to the department. The department shall submit such reports to the Consortium for Medical Marijuana Clinical Outcomes Research established pursuant to s. 1004.4351.
(h) An active order for low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis issued pursuant to former s. 381.986, Florida Statutes 2016, and registered with the compassionate use registry before June 23, 2017, is deemed a physician certification, and all patients possessing such orders are deemed qualified patients until the department begins issuing medical marijuana use registry identification cards.
(i) The department shall monitor physician registration in the medical marijuana use registry and the issuance of physician certifications for practices that could facilitate unlawful diversion or misuse of marijuana or a marijuana delivery device and shall take disciplinary action as appropriate. The department may suspend the registration of a qualified physician in the medical marijuana use registry for a period of up to 2 years if the qualified physician:
1. Fails to comply with this section; or
2. Provides, advertises, or markets telehealth services before July 1, 2023.
(j) The Board of Medicine and the Board of Osteopathic Medicine shall jointly create a physician certification pattern review panel that shall review all physician certifications submitted to the medical marijuana use registry. The panel shall track and report the number of physician certifications and the qualifying medical conditions, dosage, supply amount, and form of marijuana certified. The panel shall report the data both by individual qualified physician and in the aggregate, by county, and statewide. The physician certification pattern review panel shall, beginning January 1, 2018, submit an annual report of its findings and recommendations to the Governor, the President of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives.
(k) The department, the Board of Medicine, and the Board of Osteopathic Medicine may adopt rules pursuant to ss. 120.536(1) and 120.54 to implement this subsection.
(5) MEDICAL MARIJUANA USE REGISTRY.—
(a) The department shall create and maintain a secure, electronic, and online medical marijuana use registry for physicians, patients, and caregivers as provided under this section. The medical marijuana use registry must be accessible to law enforcement agencies, qualified physicians, and medical marijuana treatment centers to verify the authorization of a qualified patient or a caregiver to possess marijuana or a marijuana delivery device and record the marijuana or marijuana delivery device dispensed. The medical marijuana use registry must also be accessible to practitioners licensed to prescribe prescription drugs to ensure proper care for patients before medications that may interact with the medical use of marijuana are prescribed. The medical marijuana use registry must prevent an active registration of a qualified patient by multiple physicians.
(b) The department shall determine whether an individual is a resident of this state for the purpose of registration of qualified patients and caregivers in the medical marijuana use registry. To prove residency:
1. An adult resident must provide the department with a copy of his or her valid Florida driver license issued under s. 322.18 or a copy of a valid Florida identification card issued under s. 322.051.
2. An adult seasonal resident who cannot meet the requirements of subparagraph 1. may provide the department with a copy of two of the following that show proof of residential address:
a. A deed, mortgage, monthly mortgage statement, mortgage payment booklet or residential rental or lease agreement.
b. One proof of residential address from the seasonal resident’s parent, step-parent, legal guardian or other person with whom the seasonal resident resides and a statement from the person with whom the seasonal resident resides stating that the seasonal resident does reside with him or her.
c. A utility hookup or work order dated within 60 days before registration in the medical use registry.
d. A utility bill, not more than 2 months old.
e. Mail from a financial institution, including checking, savings, or investment account statements, not more than 2 months old.
f. Mail from a federal, state, county, or municipal government agency, not more than 2 months old.
g. Any other documentation that provides proof of residential address as determined by department rule.
3. A minor must provide the department with a certified copy of a birth certificate or a current record of registration from a Florida K-12 school and must have a parent or legal guardian who meets the requirements of subparagraph 1.
For the purposes of this paragraph, the term “seasonal resident” means any person who temporarily resides in this state for a period of at least 31 consecutive days in each calendar year, maintains a temporary residence in this state, returns to the state or jurisdiction of his or her residence at least one time during each calendar year, and is registered to vote or pays income tax in another state or jurisdiction.
(c) The department may suspend or revoke the registration of a qualified patient or caregiver if the qualified patient or caregiver:
1. Provides misleading, incorrect, false, or fraudulent information to the department;
2. Obtains a supply of marijuana in an amount greater than the amount authorized by the physician certification;
3. Falsifies, alters, or otherwise modifies an identification card;
4. Fails to timely notify the department of any changes to his or her qualified patient status; or
5. Violates the requirements of this section or any rule adopted under this section.
(d) The department shall immediately suspend the registration of a qualified patient charged with a violation of chapter 893 until final disposition of the alleged offense. Based upon such final disposition, the department may extend the suspension, revoke the registration, or reinstate the registration. However, the department must revoke the registration of the qualified patient upon such final disposition if the qualified patient was convicted of, or pled guilty or nolo contendere to, regardless of adjudication, a violation of chapter 893 if such violation was for trafficking in; the sale, manufacture, or delivery of; or possession with intent to sell, manufacture, or deliver a controlled substance. If such person wishes to seek reinstatement of his or her registration as a qualified patient, the person may submit a new application accompanied by a notarized attestation by the applicant that he or she has completed all terms of incarceration, probation, community control, or supervision related to the offense. A person who knowingly makes a false attestation under this paragraph commits a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(e) The department shall immediately suspend the registration of a caregiver charged with a violation of chapter 893 until final disposition of the alleged offense. The department must revoke the registration of the caregiver upon such final disposition if the caregiver was convicted of, or pled guilty or nolo contendere to, regardless of adjudication, a violation of chapter 893 if such violation was for trafficking in; the sale, manufacture, or delivery of; or possession with intent to sell, manufacture, or deliver a controlled substance. If such person wishes to seek reinstatement of his or her registration as a caregiver, the person may submit a new application accompanied by a notarized attestation by the applicant that he or she has completed all terms of incarceration, probation, community control, or supervision related to the offense. A person who knowingly makes a false attestation under this paragraph commits a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083. Additionally, the department must revoke a caregiver registration if the caregiver does not meet the requirements of subparagraph (6)(b)6.
(f) The department may revoke the registration of a qualified patient or caregiver who cultivates marijuana or who acquires, possesses, or delivers marijuana from any person or entity other than a medical marijuana treatment center.
(g) The department shall revoke the registration of a qualified patient, and the patient’s associated caregiver, upon notification that the patient no longer meets the criteria of a qualified patient.
(h) The department may adopt rules pursuant to ss. 120.536(1) and 120.54 to implement this subsection.
(6) CAREGIVERS.—
(a) The department must register an individual as a caregiver on the medical marijuana use registry and issue a caregiver identification card if an individual designated by a qualified patient meets all of the requirements of this subsection and department rule.
(b) A caregiver must:
1. Not be a qualified physician and not be employed by or have an economic interest in a medical marijuana treatment center or a marijuana testing laboratory.
2. Be 21 years of age or older and a resident of this state.
3. Agree in writing to assist with the qualified patient’s medical use of marijuana.
4. Be registered in the medical marijuana use registry as a caregiver for no more than one qualified patient, except as provided in this paragraph.
5. Successfully complete a caregiver certification course developed and administered by the department or its designee, which must be renewed biennially. The price of the course may not exceed $100.
6. Pass a background screening pursuant to subsection (9), unless the patient is a close relative of the caregiver.
(c) A qualified patient may designate no more than one caregiver to assist with the qualified patient’s medical use of marijuana, unless:
1. The qualified patient is a minor and the designated caregivers are parents or legal guardians of the qualified patient;
2. The qualified patient is an adult who has an intellectual or developmental disability that prevents the patient from being able to protect or care for himself or herself without assistance or supervision and the designated caregivers are the parents or legal guardians of the qualified patient;
3. The qualified patient is admitted to a hospice program; or
4. The qualified patient is participating in a research program in a teaching nursing home pursuant to s. 1004.4351.
(d) A caregiver may be registered in the medical marijuana use registry as a designated caregiver for no more than one qualified patient, unless:
1. The caregiver is a parent or legal guardian of more than one minor who is a qualified patient;
2. The caregiver is a parent or legal guardian of more than one adult who is a qualified patient and who has an intellectual or developmental disability that prevents the patient from being able to protect or care for himself or herself without assistance or supervision;
3. All qualified patients the caregiver has agreed to assist are admitted to a hospice program and have requested the assistance of that caregiver with the medical use of marijuana; the caregiver is an employee of the hospice; and the caregiver provides personal care or other services directly to clients of the hospice in the scope of that employment; or
4. All qualified patients the caregiver has agreed to assist are participating in a research program in a teaching nursing home pursuant to s. 1004.4351.
(e) A caregiver may not receive compensation, other than actual expenses incurred, for any services provided to the qualified patient.
(f) If a qualified patient is younger than 18 years of age, only a caregiver may purchase or administer marijuana for medical use by the qualified patient. The qualified patient may not purchase marijuana.
(g) A caregiver must be in immediate possession of his or her medical marijuana use registry identification card at all times when in possession of marijuana or a marijuana delivery device and must present his or her medical marijuana use registry identification card upon the request of a law enforcement officer.
(h) The department may adopt rules pursuant to ss. 120.536(1) and 120.54 to implement this subsection.
(7) IDENTIFICATION CARDS.—
(a) The department shall issue medical marijuana use registry identification cards for qualified patients and caregivers who are residents of this state, which must be renewed annually. The identification cards must be resistant to counterfeiting and tampering and must include, at a minimum, the following:
1. The name, address, and date of birth of the qualified patient or caregiver.
2. A full-face, passport-type, color photograph of the qualified patient or caregiver taken within the 90 days immediately preceding registration or the Florida driver license or Florida identification card photograph of the qualified patient or caregiver obtained directly from the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles.
3. Identification as a qualified patient or a caregiver.
4. The unique numeric identifier used for the qualified patient in the medical marijuana use registry.
5. For a caregiver, the name and unique numeric identifier of the caregiver and the qualified patient or patients that the caregiver is assisting.
6. The expiration date of the identification card.
(b) The department must receive written consent from a qualified patient’s parent or legal guardian before it may issue an identification card to a qualified patient who is a minor.
(c) The department shall adopt rules pursuant to ss. 120.536(1) and 120.54 establishing procedures for the issuance, renewal, suspension, replacement, surrender, and revocation of medical marijuana use registry identification cards pursuant to this section and shall begin issuing qualified patient identification cards by October 3, 2017.
(d) Applications for identification cards must be submitted on a form prescribed by the department. The department may charge a reasonable fee associated with the issuance, replacement, and renewal of identification cards. The department shall allocate $10 of the identification card fee to the Division of Research at Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University for the purpose of educating minorities about marijuana for medical use and the impact of the unlawful use of marijuana on minority communities. The department shall contract with a third-party vendor to issue identification cards. The vendor selected by the department must have experience performing similar functions for other state agencies.
(e) A qualified patient or caregiver shall return his or her identification card to the department within 5 business days after revocation.
(8) MEDICAL MARIJUANA TREATMENT CENTERS.—
(a) The department shall license medical marijuana treatment centers to ensure reasonable statewide accessibility and availability as necessary for qualified patients registered in the medical marijuana use registry and who are issued a physician certification under this section.
1. As soon as practicable, but no later than July 3, 2017, the department shall license as a medical marijuana treatment center any entity that holds an active, unrestricted license to cultivate, process, transport, and dispense low-THC cannabis, medical cannabis, and cannabis delivery devices, under former s. 381.986, Florida Statutes 2016, before July 1, 2017, and which meets the requirements of this section. In addition to the authority granted under this section, these entities are authorized to dispense low-THC cannabis, medical cannabis, and cannabis delivery devices ordered pursuant to former s. 381.986, Florida Statutes 2016, which were entered into the compassionate use registry before July 1, 2017, and are authorized to begin dispensing marijuana under this section on July 3, 2017. The department may grant variances from the representations made in such an entity’s original application for approval under former s. 381.986, Florida Statutes 2014, pursuant to paragraph (e).
2. The department shall license as medical marijuana treatment centers 10 applicants that meet the requirements of this section, under the following parameters:
a. As soon as practicable, but no later than August 1, 2017, the department shall license any applicant whose application was reviewed, evaluated, and scored by the department and which was denied a dispensing organization license by the department under former s. 381.986, Florida Statutes 2014; which had one or more administrative or judicial challenges pending as of January 1, 2017, or had a final ranking within one point of the highest final ranking in its region under former s. 381.986, Florida Statutes 2014; which meets the requirements of this section; and which provides documentation to the department that it has the existing infrastructure and technical and technological ability to begin cultivating marijuana within 30 days after registration as a medical marijuana treatment center.
b. As soon as practicable, the department shall license one applicant that is a recognized class member of Pigford v. Glickman, 185 F.R.D. 82 (D.D.C. 1999), or In Re Black Farmers Litig., 856 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2011). An applicant licensed under this sub-subparagraph is exempt from the requirement of subparagraph (b)2. An applicant that applies for licensure under this sub-subparagraph, pays its initial application fee, is determined by the department through the application process to qualify as a recognized class member, and is not awarded a license under this sub-subparagraph may transfer its initial application fee to one subsequent opportunity to apply for licensure under subparagraph 4.
c. As soon as practicable, but no later than October 3, 2017, the department shall license applicants that meet the requirements of this section in sufficient numbers to result in 10 total licenses issued under this subparagraph, while accounting for the number of licenses issued under sub-subparagraphs a. and b.
3. For up to two of the licenses issued under subparagraph 2., the department shall give preference to applicants that demonstrate in their applications that they own one or more facilities that are, or were, used for the canning, concentrating, or otherwise processing of citrus fruit or citrus molasses and will use or convert the facility or facilities for the processing of marijuana.
4. Within 6 months after the registration of 100,000 active qualified patients in the medical marijuana use registry, the department shall license four additional medical marijuana treatment centers that meet the requirements of this section. Thereafter, the department shall license four medical marijuana treatment centers within 6 months after the registration of each additional 100,000 active qualified patients in the medical marijuana use registry that meet the requirements of this section.
2(b) An applicant for licensure as a medical marijuana treatment center must apply to the department on a form prescribed by the department and adopted in rule. The department shall adopt rules pursuant to ss. 120.536(1) and 120.54 establishing a procedure for the issuance and biennial renewal of licenses, including initial application and biennial renewal fees sufficient to cover the costs of implementing and administering this section, and establishing supplemental licensure fees for payment beginning May 1, 2018, sufficient to cover the costs of administering ss. 381.989 and 1004.4351. The department shall identify applicants with strong diversity plans reflecting this state’s commitment to diversity and implement training programs and other educational programs to enable minority persons and minority business enterprises, as defined in s. 288.703, and veteran business enterprises, as defined in s. 295.187, to compete for medical marijuana treatment center licensure and contracts. Subject to the requirements in subparagraphs (a)2.-4., the department shall issue a license to an applicant if the applicant meets the requirements of this section and pays the initial application fee. The department shall renew the licensure of a medical marijuana treatment center biennially if the licensee meets the requirements of this section and pays the biennial renewal fee. However, the department may not renew the license of a medical marijuana treatment center that has not begun to cultivate, process, and dispense marijuana by the date that the medical marijuana treatment center is required to renew its license. An individual may not be an applicant, owner, officer, board member, or manager on more than one application for licensure as a medical marijuana treatment center. An individual or entity may not be awarded more than one license as a medical marijuana treatment center. An applicant for licensure as a medical marijuana treatment center must demonstrate:
1. That, for the 5 consecutive years before submitting the application, the applicant has been registered to do business in this state.
2. Possession of a valid certificate of registration issued by the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services pursuant to s. 581.131.
3. The technical and technological ability to cultivate and produce marijuana, including, but not limited to, low-THC cannabis.
4. The ability to secure the premises, resources, and personnel necessary to operate as a medical marijuana treatment center.
5. The ability to maintain accountability of all raw materials, finished products, and any byproducts to prevent diversion or unlawful access to or possession of these substances.
6. An infrastructure reasonably located to dispense marijuana to registered qualified patients statewide or regionally as determined by the department.
7. The financial ability to maintain operations for the duration of the 2-year approval cycle, including the provision of certified financial statements to the department.
a. Upon approval, the applicant must post a $5 million performance bond issued by an authorized surety insurance company rated in one of the three highest rating categories by a nationally recognized rating service. However, a medical marijuana treatment center serving at least 1,000 qualified patients is only required to maintain a $2 million performance bond.
b. In lieu of the performance bond required under sub-subparagraph a., the applicant may provide an irrevocable letter of credit payable to the department or provide cash to the department. If provided with cash under this sub-subparagraph, the department must deposit the cash in the Grants and Donations Trust Fund within the Department of Health, subject to the same conditions as the bond regarding requirements for the applicant to forfeit ownership of the funds. If the funds deposited under this sub-subparagraph generate interest, the amount of that interest must be used by the department for the administration of this section.
8. That all owners and managers have passed a background screening pursuant to subsection (9). As used in this subparagraph, the term:
a. “Manager” means any person with the authority to exercise or contribute to the operational control, direction, or management of an applicant or a medical marijuana treatment center or who has authority to supervise any employee of an applicant or a medical marijuana treatment center. The term includes an individual with the power or authority to direct or influence the direction or operation of an applicant or a medical marijuana treatment center through board membership, an agreement, or a contract.
b. “Owner” means any person who owns or controls a 5 percent or greater share of interests of the applicant or a medical marijuana treatment center which include beneficial or voting rights to interests. In the event that one person owns a beneficial right to interests and another person holds the voting rights with respect to such interests, then in such case, both are considered the owner of such interests.
9. The employment of a medical director to supervise the activities of the medical marijuana treatment center.
10. A diversity plan that promotes and ensures the involvement of minority persons and minority business enterprises, as defined in s. 288.703, or veteran business enterprises, as defined in s. 295.187, in ownership, management, and employment. An applicant for licensure renewal must show the effectiveness of the diversity plan by including the following with his or her application for renewal:
a. Representation of minority persons and veterans in the medical marijuana treatment center’s workforce;
b. Efforts to recruit minority persons and veterans for employment; and
c. A record of contracts for services with minority business enterprises and veteran business enterprises.
(c) A medical marijuana treatment center may not make a wholesale purchase of marijuana from, or a distribution of marijuana to, another medical marijuana treatment center, unless the medical marijuana treatment center seeking to make a wholesale purchase of marijuana submits proof of harvest failure to the department.
(d) The department shall establish, maintain, and control a computer software tracking system that traces marijuana from seed to sale and allows real-time, 24-hour access by the department to data from all medical marijuana treatment centers and marijuana testing laboratories. The tracking system must allow for integration of other seed-to-sale systems and, at a minimum, include notification of when marijuana seeds are planted, when marijuana plants are harvested and destroyed, and when marijuana is transported, sold, stolen, diverted, or lost. Each medical marijuana treatment center shall use the seed-to-sale tracking system established by the department or integrate its own seed-to-sale tracking system with the seed-to-sale tracking system established by the department. Each medical marijuana treatment center may use its own seed-to-sale system until the department establishes a seed-to-sale tracking system. The department may contract with a vendor to establish the seed-to-sale tracking system. The vendor selected by the department may not have a contractual relationship with the department to perform any services pursuant to this section other than the seed-to-sale tracking system. The vendor may not have a direct or indirect financial interest in a medical marijuana treatment center or a marijuana testing laboratory.
2(e) A licensed medical marijuana treatment center shall cultivate, process, transport, and dispense marijuana for medical use. A licensed medical marijuana treatment center may not contract for services directly related to the cultivation, processing, and dispensing of marijuana or marijuana delivery devices, except that a medical marijuana treatment center licensed pursuant to subparagraph (a)1. may contract with a single entity for the cultivation, processing, transporting, and dispensing of marijuana and marijuana delivery devices. A licensed medical marijuana treatment center shall, at all times, maintain compliance with the criteria demonstrated and representations made in the initial application and the criteria established in this subsection. Upon request, the department may grant a medical marijuana treatment center a variance from the representations made in the initial application. Consideration of such a request must be based upon the individual facts and circumstances surrounding the request. A variance may not be granted unless the requesting medical marijuana treatment center can demonstrate to the department that it has a proposed alternative to the specific representation made in its application which fulfills the same or a similar purpose as the specific representation in a way that the department can reasonably determine will not be a lower standard than the specific representation in the application. A variance may not be granted from the requirements in subparagraph 2. and subparagraphs (b)1. and 2.
1. A licensed medical marijuana treatment center may transfer ownership to an individual or entity who meets the requirements of this section. A publicly traded corporation or publicly traded company that meets the requirements of this section is not precluded from ownership of a medical marijuana treatment center. To accommodate a change in ownership:
a. The licensed medical marijuana treatment center shall notify the department in writing at least 60 days before the anticipated date of the change of ownership.
b. The individual or entity applying for initial licensure due to a change of ownership must submit an application that must be received by the department at least 60 days before the date of change of ownership.
c. Upon receipt of an application for a license, the department shall examine the application and, within 30 days after receipt, notify the applicant in writing of any apparent errors or omissions and request any additional information required.
d. Requested information omitted from an application for licensure must be filed with the department within 21 days after the department’s request for omitted information or the application will be deemed incomplete and withdrawn from further consideration and the fees forfeited.
e. Within 30 days after the receipt of a complete application, the department shall approve or deny the application.
2. A medical marijuana treatment center, and any individual or entity who directly or indirectly owns, controls, or holds with power to vote 5 percent or more of the voting shares of a medical marijuana treatment center, may not acquire direct or indirect ownership or control of any voting shares or other form of ownership of any other medical marijuana treatment center.
3. A medical marijuana treatment center may not enter into any form of profit-sharing arrangement with the property owner or lessor of any of its facilities where cultivation, processing, storing, or dispensing of marijuana and marijuana delivery devices occurs.
4. All employees of a medical marijuana treatment center must be 21 years of age or older and have passed a background screening pursuant to subsection (9). As used in this subparagraph, the term “employee” means any person employed by a medical marijuana treatment center licensee in any capacity, including those whose duties involve any aspect of the cultivation, processing, transportation, or dispensing of marijuana. This requirement applies to all employees, regardless of the compensation received.
5. Each medical marijuana treatment center must adopt and enforce policies and procedures to ensure employees and volunteers receive training on the legal requirements to dispense marijuana to qualified patients.
6. When growing marijuana, a medical marijuana treatment center:
a. May use pesticides determined by the department, after consultation with the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, to be safely applied to plants intended for human consumption, but may not use pesticides designated as restricted-use pesticides pursuant to s. 487.042.
b. Must grow marijuana within an enclosed structure and in a room separate from any other plant.
c. Must inspect seeds and growing plants for plant pests that endanger or threaten the horticultural and agricultural interests of the state in accordance with chapter 581 and any rules adopted thereunder.
d. Must perform fumigation or treatment of plants, or remove and destroy infested or infected plants, in accordance with chapter 581 and any rules adopted thereunder.
7. Each medical marijuana treatment center must produce and make available for purchase at least one low-THC cannabis product.
8. A medical marijuana treatment center that produces edibles must hold a permit to operate as a food establishment pursuant to chapter 500, the Florida Food Safety Act, and must comply with all the requirements for food establishments pursuant to chapter 500 and any rules adopted thereunder. Edibles may not contain more than 200 milligrams of tetrahydrocannabinol, and a single serving portion of an edible may not exceed 10 milligrams of tetrahydrocannabinol. Edibles may not have a potency variance greater than 15 percent. Marijuana products, including edibles, may not be attractive to children; be manufactured in the shape of humans, cartoons, or animals; be manufactured in a form that bears any reasonable resemblance to products available for consumption as commercially available candy; or contain any color additives. To discourage consumption of edibles by children, the department shall determine by rule any shapes, forms, and ingredients allowed and prohibited for edibles. Medical marijuana treatment centers may not begin processing or dispensing edibles until after the effective date of the rule. The department shall also adopt sanitation rules providing the standards and requirements for the storage, display, or dispensing of edibles.
9. Within 12 months after licensure, a medical marijuana treatment center must demonstrate to the department that all of its processing facilities have passed a Food Safety Good Manufacturing Practices, such as Global Food Safety Initiative or equivalent, inspection by a nationally accredited certifying body. A medical marijuana treatment center must immediately stop processing at any facility which fails to pass this inspection until it demonstrates to the department that such facility has met this requirement.
10. A medical marijuana treatment center that produces prerolled marijuana cigarettes may not use wrapping paper made with tobacco or hemp.
11. When processing marijuana, a medical marijuana treatment center must:
a. Process the marijuana within an enclosed structure and in a room separate from other plants or products.
b. Comply with department rules when processing marijuana with hydrocarbon solvents or other solvents or gases exhibiting potential toxicity to humans. The department shall determine by rule the requirements for medical marijuana treatment centers to use such solvents or gases exhibiting potential toxicity to humans.
c. Comply with federal and state laws and regulations and department rules for solid and liquid wastes. The department shall determine by rule procedures for the storage, handling, transportation, management, and disposal of solid and liquid waste generated during marijuana production and processing. The Department of Environmental Protection shall assist the department in developing such rules.
d. Test the processed marijuana using a medical marijuana testing laboratory before it is dispensed. Results must be verified and signed by two medical marijuana treatment center employees. Before dispensing, the medical marijuana treatment center must determine that the test results indicate that low-THC cannabis meets the definition of low-THC cannabis, the concentration of tetrahydrocannabinol meets the potency requirements of this section, the labeling of the concentration of tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol is accurate, and all marijuana is safe for human consumption and free from contaminants that are unsafe for human consumption. The department shall determine by rule which contaminants must be tested for and the maximum levels of each contaminant which are safe for human consumption. The Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services shall assist the department in developing the testing requirements for contaminants that are unsafe for human consumption in edibles. The department shall also determine by rule the procedures for the treatment of marijuana that fails to meet the testing requirements of this section, s. 381.988, or department rule. The department may select samples of marijuana from a medical marijuana treatment center facility which shall be tested by the department to determine whether the marijuana meets the potency requirements of this section, is safe for human consumption, and is accurately labeled with the tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol concentration or to verify the result of marijuana testing conducted by a marijuana testing laboratory. The department may also select samples of marijuana delivery devices from a medical marijuana treatment center to determine whether the marijuana delivery device is safe for use by qualified patients. A medical marijuana treatment center may not require payment from the department for the sample. A medical marijuana treatment center must recall marijuana, including all marijuana and marijuana products made from the same batch of marijuana, that fails to meet the potency requirements of this section, that is unsafe for human consumption, or for which the labeling of the tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol concentration is inaccurate. The department shall adopt rules to establish marijuana potency variations of no greater than 15 percent using negotiated rulemaking pursuant to s. 120.54(2)(d) which accounts for, but is not limited to, time lapses between testing, testing methods, testing instruments, and types of marijuana sampled for testing. The department may not issue any recalls for product potency as it relates to product labeling before issuing a rule relating to potency variation standards. A medical marijuana treatment center must also recall all marijuana delivery devices determined to be unsafe for use by qualified patients. The medical marijuana treatment center must retain records of all testing and samples of each homogeneous batch of marijuana for at least 9 months. The medical marijuana treatment center must contract with a marijuana testing laboratory to perform audits on the medical marijuana treatment center’s standard operating procedures, testing records, and samples and provide the results to the department to confirm that the marijuana or low-THC cannabis meets the requirements of this section and that the marijuana or low-THC cannabis is safe for human consumption. A medical marijuana treatment center shall reserve two processed samples from each batch and retain such samples for at least 9 months for the purpose of such audits. A medical marijuana treatment center may use a laboratory that has not been certified by the department under s. 381.988 until such time as at least one laboratory holds the required certification, but in no event later than July 1, 2018.
e. Package the marijuana in compliance with the United States Poison Prevention Packaging Act of 1970, 15 U.S.C. ss. 1471 et seq.
f. Package the marijuana in a receptacle that has a firmly affixed and legible label stating the following information:
(I) The marijuana or low-THC cannabis meets the requirements of sub-subparagraph d.
(II) The name of the medical marijuana treatment center from which the marijuana originates.
(III) The batch number and harvest number from which the marijuana originates and the date dispensed.
(IV) The name of the physician who issued the physician certification.
(V) The name of the patient.
(VI) The product name, if applicable, and dosage form, including concentration of tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol. The product name may not contain wording commonly associated with products that are attractive to children or which promote the recreational use of marijuana.
(VII) The recommended dose.
(VIII) A warning that it is illegal to transfer medical marijuana to another person.
(IX) A marijuana universal symbol developed by the department.
12. The medical marijuana treatment center shall include in each package a patient package insert with information on the specific product dispensed related to:
a. Clinical pharmacology.
b. Indications and use.
c. Dosage and administration.
d. Dosage forms and strengths.
e. Contraindications.
f. Warnings and precautions.
g. Adverse reactions.
13. In addition to the packaging and labeling requirements specified in subparagraphs 11. and 12., marijuana in a form for smoking must be packaged in a sealed receptacle with a legible and prominent warning to keep away from children and a warning that states marijuana smoke contains carcinogens and may negatively affect health. Such receptacles for marijuana in a form for smoking must be plain, opaque, and white without depictions of the product or images other than the medical marijuana treatment center’s department-approved logo and the marijuana universal symbol.
14. The department shall adopt rules to regulate the types, appearance, and labeling of marijuana delivery devices dispensed from a medical marijuana treatment center. The rules must require marijuana delivery devices to have an appearance consistent with medical use.
15. Each edible must be individually sealed in plain, opaque wrapping marked only with the marijuana universal symbol. Where practical, each edible must be marked with the marijuana universal symbol. In addition to the packaging and labeling requirements in subparagraphs 11. and 12., edible receptacles must be plain, opaque, and white without depictions of the product or images other than the medical marijuana treatment center’s department-approved logo and the marijuana universal symbol. The receptacle must also include a list of all the edible’s ingredients, storage instructions, an expiration date, a legible and prominent warning to keep away from children and pets, and a warning that the edible has not been produced or inspected pursuant to federal food safety laws.
16. When dispensing marijuana or a marijuana delivery device, a medical marijuana treatment center:
a. May dispense any active, valid order for low-THC cannabis, medical cannabis and cannabis delivery devices issued pursuant to former s. 381.986, Florida Statutes 2016, which was entered into the medical marijuana use registry before July 1, 2017.
b. May not dispense more than a 70-day supply of marijuana within any 70-day period to a qualified patient or caregiver. May not dispense more than one 35-day supply of marijuana in a form for smoking within any 35-day period to a qualified patient or caregiver. A 35-day supply of marijuana in a form for smoking may not exceed 2.5 ounces unless an exception to this amount is approved by the department pursuant to paragraph (4)(f).
c. Must have the medical marijuana treatment center’s employee who dispenses the marijuana or a marijuana delivery device enter into the medical marijuana use registry his or her name or unique employee identifier.
d. Must verify that the qualified patient and the caregiver, if applicable, each have an active registration in the medical marijuana use registry and an active and valid medical marijuana use registry identification card, the amount and type of marijuana dispensed matches the physician certification in the medical marijuana use registry for that qualified patient, and the physician certification has not already been filled.
e. May not dispense marijuana to a qualified patient who is younger than 18 years of age. If the qualified patient is younger than 18 years of age, marijuana may only be dispensed to the qualified patient’s caregiver.
f. May not dispense or sell any other type of cannabis, alcohol, or illicit drug-related product, including pipes or wrapping papers made with tobacco or hemp, other than a marijuana delivery device required for the medical use of marijuana and which is specified in a physician certification.
g. Must, upon dispensing the marijuana or marijuana delivery device, record in the registry the date, time, quantity, and form of marijuana dispensed; the type of marijuana delivery device dispensed; and the name and medical marijuana use registry identification number of the qualified patient or caregiver to whom the marijuana delivery device was dispensed.
h. Must ensure that patient records are not visible to anyone other than the qualified patient, his or her caregiver, and authorized medical marijuana treatment center employees.
2(f) To ensure the safety and security of premises where the cultivation, processing, storing, or dispensing of marijuana occurs, and to maintain adequate controls against the diversion, theft, and loss of marijuana or marijuana delivery devices, a medical marijuana treatment center shall:
1.a. Maintain a fully operational security alarm system that secures all entry points and perimeter windows and is equipped with motion detectors; pressure switches; and duress, panic, and hold-up alarms; and
b. Maintain a video surveillance system that records continuously 24 hours a day and meets the following criteria:
(I) Cameras are fixed in a place that allows for the clear identification of persons and activities in controlled areas of the premises. Controlled areas include grow rooms, processing rooms, storage rooms, disposal rooms or areas, and point-of-sale rooms.
(II) Cameras are fixed in entrances and exits to the premises, which must record from both indoor and outdoor, or ingress and egress, vantage points.
(III) Recorded images must clearly and accurately display the time and date.
(IV) Retain video surveillance recordings for at least 45 days or longer upon the request of a law enforcement agency.
2. Ensure that the medical marijuana treatment center’s outdoor premises have sufficient lighting from dusk until dawn.
3. Ensure that the indoor premises where dispensing occurs includes a waiting area with sufficient space and seating to accommodate qualified patients and caregivers and at least one private consultation area that is isolated from the waiting area and area where dispensing occurs. A medical marijuana treatment center may not display products or dispense marijuana or marijuana delivery devices in the waiting area.
4. Not dispense from its premises marijuana or a marijuana delivery device between the hours of 9 p.m. and 7 a.m., but may perform all other operations and deliver marijuana to qualified patients 24 hours a day.
5. Store marijuana in a secured, locked room or a vault.
6. Require at least two of its employees, or two employees of a security agency with whom it contracts, to be on the premises at all times where cultivation, processing, or storing of marijuana occurs.
7. Require each employee or contractor to wear a photo identification badge at all times while on the premises.
8. Require each visitor to wear a visitor pass at all times while on the premises.
9. Implement an alcohol and drug-free workplace policy.
10. Report to local law enforcement and notify the department through e-mail within 24 hours after the medical marijuana treatment center is notified or becomes aware of any actual or attempted theft, diversion, or loss of marijuana.
(g) To ensure the safe transport of marijuana and marijuana delivery devices to medical marijuana treatment centers, marijuana testing laboratories, or qualified patients, a medical marijuana treatment center must:
1. Maintain a marijuana transportation manifest in any vehicle transporting marijuana. The marijuana transportation manifest must be generated from a medical marijuana treatment center’s seed-to-sale tracking system and include the:
a. Departure date and approximate time of departure.
b. Name, location address, and license number of the originating medical marijuana treatment center.
c. Name and address of the recipient of the delivery.
d. Quantity and form of any marijuana or marijuana delivery device being transported.
e. Arrival date and estimated time of arrival.
f. Delivery vehicle make and model and license plate number.
g. Name and signature of the medical marijuana treatment center employees delivering the product.
(I) A copy of the marijuana transportation manifest must be provided to each individual, medical marijuana treatment center, or marijuana testing laboratory that receives a delivery. The individual, or a representative of the center or laboratory, must sign a copy of the marijuana transportation manifest acknowledging receipt.
(II) An individual transporting marijuana or a marijuana delivery device must present a copy of the relevant marijuana transportation manifest and his or her employee identification card to a law enforcement officer upon request.
(III) Medical marijuana treatment centers and marijuana testing laboratories must retain copies of all marijuana transportation manifests for at least 3 years.
2. Ensure only vehicles in good working order are used to transport marijuana.
3. Lock marijuana and marijuana delivery devices in a separate compartment or container within the vehicle.
4. Require employees to have possession of their employee identification card at all times when transporting marijuana or marijuana delivery devices.
5. Require at least two persons to be in a vehicle transporting marijuana or marijuana delivery devices, and require at least one person to remain in the vehicle while the marijuana or marijuana delivery device is being delivered.
6. Provide specific safety and security training to employees transporting or delivering marijuana and marijuana delivery devices.
(h) A medical marijuana treatment center may not engage in advertising that is visible to members of the public from any street, sidewalk, park, or other public place, except:
1. The dispensing location of a medical marijuana treatment center may have a sign that is affixed to the outside or hanging in the window of the premises which identifies the dispensary by the licensee’s business name, a department-approved trade name, or a department-approved logo. A medical marijuana treatment center’s trade name and logo may not contain wording or images that are attractive to children or which promote recreational use of marijuana.
2. A medical marijuana treatment center may engage in Internet advertising and marketing under the following conditions:
a. All advertisements must be approved by the department.
b. An advertisement may not have any content that is attractive to children or which promotes the recreational use of marijuana.
c. An advertisement may not be an unsolicited pop-up advertisement.
d. Opt-in marketing must include an easy and permanent opt-out feature.
(i) Each medical marijuana treatment center that dispenses marijuana and marijuana delivery devices shall make available to the public on its website:
1. Each marijuana and low-THC product available for purchase, including the form, strain of marijuana from which it was extracted, cannabidiol content, tetrahydrocannabinol content, dose unit, total number of doses available, and the ratio of cannabidiol to tetrahydrocannabinol for each product.
2. The price for a 30-day, 50-day, and 70-day supply at a standard dose for each marijuana and low-THC product available for purchase.
3. The price for each marijuana delivery device available for purchase.
4. If applicable, any discount policies and eligibility criteria for such discounts.
(j) Medical marijuana treatment centers are the sole source from which a qualified patient may legally obtain marijuana.
(k) The department may adopt rules pursuant to ss. 120.536(1) and 120.54 to implement this subsection.
(9) BACKGROUND SCREENING.—An individual required to undergo a background screening pursuant to this section must pass a level 2 background screening as provided under chapter 435, which, in addition to the disqualifying offenses provided in s. 435.04, shall exclude an individual who has an arrest awaiting final disposition for, has been found guilty of, regardless of adjudication, or has entered a plea of nolo contendere or guilty to an offense under chapter 837, chapter 895, or chapter 896 or similar law of another jurisdiction. Exemptions from disqualification as provided under s. 435.07 do not apply to this subsection.
(a) Such individual must submit a full set of fingerprints to the department or to a vendor, entity, or agency authorized by s. 943.053(13). The department, vendor, entity, or agency shall forward the fingerprints to the Department of Law Enforcement for state processing, and the Department of Law Enforcement shall forward the fingerprints to the Federal Bureau of Investigation for national processing.
(b) Fees for state and federal fingerprint processing and retention shall be borne by the medical marijuana treatment center or caregiver, as applicable. The state cost for fingerprint processing shall be as provided in s. 943.053(3)(e) for records provided to persons or entities other than those specified as exceptions therein.
(c) Fingerprints submitted to the Department of Law Enforcement pursuant to this subsection shall be retained by the Department of Law Enforcement as provided in s. 943.05(2)(g) and (h) and, when the Department of Law Enforcement begins participation in the program, enrolled in the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s national retained print arrest notification program. Any arrest record identified shall be reported to the department.
(10) MEDICAL MARIJUANA TREATMENT CENTER INSPECTIONS; ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS.—
(a) The department shall conduct announced or unannounced inspections of medical marijuana treatment centers to determine compliance with this section or rules adopted pursuant to this section.
(b) The department shall inspect a medical marijuana treatment center upon receiving a complaint or notice that the medical marijuana treatment center has dispensed marijuana containing mold, bacteria, or other contaminant that may cause or has caused an adverse effect to human health or the environment.
(c) The department shall conduct at least a biennial inspection of each medical marijuana treatment center to evaluate the medical marijuana treatment center’s records, personnel, equipment, processes, security measures, sanitation practices, and quality assurance practices.
(d) The Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services and the department shall enter into an interagency agreement to ensure cooperation and coordination in the performance of their obligations under this section and their respective regulatory and authorizing laws. The department, the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, and the Department of Law Enforcement may enter into interagency agreements for the purposes specified in this subsection or subsection (7).
(e) The department shall publish a list of all approved medical marijuana treatment centers, medical directors, and qualified physicians on its website.
(f) The department may impose reasonable fines not to exceed $10,000 on a medical marijuana treatment center for any of the following violations:
1. Violating this section or department rule.
2. Failing to maintain qualifications for approval.
3. Endangering the health, safety, or security of a qualified patient.
4. Improperly disclosing personal and confidential information of the qualified patient.
5. Attempting to procure medical marijuana treatment center approval by bribery, fraudulent misrepresentation, or extortion.
6. Being convicted or found guilty of, or entering a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to, regardless of adjudication, a crime in any jurisdiction which directly relates to the business of a medical marijuana treatment center.
7. Making or filing a report or record that the medical marijuana treatment center knows to be false.
8. Willfully failing to maintain a record required by this section or department rule.
9. Willfully impeding or obstructing an employee or agent of the department in the furtherance of his or her official duties.
10. Engaging in fraud or deceit, negligence, incompetence, or misconduct in the business practices of a medical marijuana treatment center.
11. Making misleading, deceptive, or fraudulent representations in or related to the business practices of a medical marijuana treatment center.
12. Having a license or the authority to engage in any regulated profession, occupation, or business that is related to the business practices of a medical marijuana treatment center suspended, revoked, or otherwise acted against by the licensing authority of any jurisdiction, including its agencies or subdivisions, for a violation that would constitute a violation under Florida law.
13. Violating a lawful order of the department or an agency of the state, or failing to comply with a lawfully issued subpoena of the department or an agency of the state.
(g) The department may suspend, revoke, or refuse to renew a medical marijuana treatment center license if the medical marijuana treatment center commits any of the violations in paragraph (f).
(h) The department may adopt rules pursuant to ss. 120.536(1) and 120.54 to implement this subsection.
(11) PREEMPTION.—Regulation of cultivation, processing, and delivery of marijuana by medical marijuana treatment centers is preempted to the state except as provided in this subsection.
(a) A medical marijuana treatment center cultivating or processing facility may not be located within 500 feet of the real property that comprises a public or private elementary school, middle school, or secondary school.
(b)1. A county or municipality may, by ordinance, ban medical marijuana treatment center dispensing facilities from being located within the boundaries of that county or municipality. A county or municipality that does not ban dispensing facilities under this subparagraph may not place specific limits, by ordinance, on the number of dispensing facilities that may locate within that county or municipality.
2. A municipality may determine by ordinance the criteria for the location of, and other permitting requirements that do not conflict with state law or department rule for, medical marijuana treatment center dispensing facilities located within the boundaries of that municipality. A county may determine by ordinance the criteria for the location of, and other permitting requirements that do not conflict with state law or department rule for, all such dispensing facilities located within the unincorporated areas of that county. Except as provided in paragraph (c), a county or municipality may not enact ordinances for permitting or for determining the location of dispensing facilities which are more restrictive than its ordinances permitting or determining the locations for pharmacies licensed under chapter 465. A municipality or county may not charge a medical marijuana treatment center a license or permit fee in an amount greater than the fee charged by such municipality or county to pharmacies. A dispensing facility location approved by a municipality or county pursuant to former s. 381.986(8)(b), Florida Statutes 2016, is not subject to the location requirements of this subsection.
(c) A medical marijuana treatment center dispensing facility may not be located within 500 feet of the real property that comprises a public or private elementary school, middle school, or secondary school unless the county or municipality approves the location through a formal proceeding open to the public at which the county or municipality determines that the location promotes the public health, safety, and general welfare of the community.
(d) This subsection does not prohibit any local jurisdiction from ensuring medical marijuana treatment center facilities comply with the Florida Building Code, the Florida Fire Prevention Code, or any local amendments to the Florida Building Code or the Florida Fire Prevention Code.
(12) PENALTIES.—
(a) A qualified physician commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083, if the qualified physician issues a physician certification for the medical use of marijuana for a patient without a reasonable belief that the patient is suffering from a qualifying medical condition.
(b) A person who fraudulently represents that he or she has a qualifying medical condition to a qualified physician for the purpose of being issued a physician certification commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(c) A qualified patient who uses marijuana, not including low-THC cannabis, or a caregiver who administers marijuana, not including low-THC cannabis, in plain view of or in a place open to the general public; in a school bus, a vehicle, an aircraft, or a boat; or on the grounds of a school except as provided in s. 1006.062, commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(d) A qualified patient or caregiver who cultivates marijuana or who purchases or acquires marijuana from any person or entity other than a medical marijuana treatment center violates s. 893.13 and is subject to the penalties provided therein.
(e)1. A qualified patient or caregiver in possession of marijuana or a marijuana delivery device who fails or refuses to present his or her marijuana use registry identification card upon the request of a law enforcement officer commits a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083, unless it can be determined through the medical marijuana use registry that the person is authorized to be in possession of that marijuana or marijuana delivery device.
2. A person charged with a violation of this paragraph may not be convicted if, before or at the time of his or her court or hearing appearance, the person produces in court or to the clerk of the court in which the charge is pending a medical marijuana use registry identification card issued to him or her which is valid at the time of his or her arrest. The clerk of the court is authorized to dismiss such case at any time before the defendant’s appearance in court. The clerk of the court may assess a fee of $5 for dismissing the case under this paragraph.
(f) A caregiver who violates any of the applicable provisions of this section or applicable department rules, for the first offense, commits a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083 and, for a second or subsequent offense, commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(g) A qualified physician who issues a physician certification for marijuana or a marijuana delivery device and receives compensation from a medical marijuana treatment center related to the issuance of a physician certification for marijuana or a marijuana delivery device is subject to disciplinary action under the applicable practice act and s. 456.072(1)(n).
(h) A person transporting marijuana or marijuana delivery devices on behalf of a medical marijuana treatment center or marijuana testing laboratory who fails or refuses to present a transportation manifest upon the request of a law enforcement officer commits a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(i) Persons and entities conducting activities authorized and governed by this section and s. 381.988 are subject to ss. 456.053, 456.054, and 817.505, as applicable.
(j) A person or entity that cultivates, processes, distributes, sells, or dispenses marijuana, as defined in s. 29(b)(4), Art. X of the State Constitution, and is not licensed as a medical marijuana treatment center violates s. 893.13 and is subject to the penalties provided therein.
(k) A person who manufactures, distributes, sells, gives, or possesses with the intent to manufacture, distribute, sell, or give marijuana or a marijuana delivery device that he or she holds out to have originated from a licensed medical marijuana treatment center but that is counterfeit commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. For the purposes of this paragraph, the term “counterfeit” means marijuana; a marijuana delivery device; or a marijuana or marijuana delivery device container, seal, or label which, without authorization, bears the trademark, trade name, or other identifying mark, imprint, or device, or any likeness thereof, of a licensed medical marijuana treatment center and which thereby falsely purports or is represented to be the product of, or to have been distributed by, that licensed medical marijuana treatment facility.
(l) Any person who possesses or manufactures a blank, forged, stolen, fictitious, fraudulent, counterfeit, or otherwise unlawfully issued medical marijuana use registry identification card commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(13) UNLICENSED ACTIVITY.—
(a) If the department has probable cause to believe that a person or entity that is not registered or licensed with the department has violated this section, s. 381.988, or any rule adopted pursuant to this section, the department may issue and deliver to such person or entity a notice to cease and desist from such violation. The department also may issue and deliver a notice to cease and desist to any person or entity who aids and abets such unlicensed activity. The issuance of a notice to cease and desist does not constitute agency action for which a hearing under s. 120.569 or s. 120.57 may be sought. For the purpose of enforcing a cease and desist order, the department may file a proceeding in the name of the state seeking issuance of an injunction or a writ of mandamus against any person or entity who violates any provisions of such order.
(b) In addition to the remedies under paragraph (a), the department may impose by citation an administrative penalty not to exceed $5,000 per incident. The citation shall be issued to the subject and must contain the subject’s name and any other information the department determines to be necessary to identify the subject, a brief factual statement, the sections of the law allegedly violated, and the penalty imposed. If the subject does not dispute the matter in the citation with the department within 30 days after the citation is served, the citation shall become a final order of the department. The department may adopt rules pursuant to ss. 120.536(1) and 120.54 to implement this section. Each day that the unlicensed activity continues after issuance of a notice to cease and desist constitutes a separate violation. The department shall be entitled to recover the costs of investigation and prosecution in addition to the fine levied pursuant to the citation. Service of a citation may be made by personal service or by mail to the subject at the subject’s last known address or place of practice. If the department is required to seek enforcement of the cease and desist or agency order, it shall be entitled to collect attorney fees and costs.
(c) In addition to or in lieu of any other administrative remedy, the department may seek the imposition of a civil penalty through the circuit court for any violation for which the department may issue a notice to cease and desist. The civil penalty shall be no less than $5,000 and no more than $10,000 for each offense. The court may also award to the prevailing party court costs and reasonable attorney fees and, in the event the department prevails, may also award reasonable costs of investigation and prosecution.
(d) In addition to the other remedies provided in this section, the department or any state attorney may bring an action for an injunction to restrain any unlicensed activity or to enjoin the future operation or maintenance of the unlicensed activity or the performance of any service in violation of this section.
(e) The department must notify local law enforcement of such unlicensed activity for a determination of any criminal violation of chapter 893.
(14) EXCEPTIONS TO OTHER LAWS.—
(a) Notwithstanding s. 893.13, s. 893.135, s. 893.147, or any other provision of law, but subject to the requirements of this section, a qualified patient and the qualified patient’s caregiver may purchase from a medical marijuana treatment center for the patient’s medical use a marijuana delivery device and up to the amount of marijuana authorized in the physician certification, but may not possess more than a 70-day supply of marijuana, or the greater of 4 ounces of marijuana in a form for smoking or an amount of marijuana in a form for smoking approved by the department pursuant to paragraph (4)(f), at any given time and all marijuana purchased must remain in its original packaging.
(b) Notwithstanding paragraph (a), s. 893.13, s. 893.135, s. 893.147, or any other provision of law, a qualified patient and the qualified patient’s caregiver may purchase and possess a marijuana delivery device intended for the medical use of marijuana by smoking from a vendor other than a medical marijuana treatment center.
(c) Notwithstanding s. 893.13, s. 893.135, s. 893.147, or any other provision of law, but subject to the requirements of this section, an approved medical marijuana treatment center and its owners, managers, and employees may manufacture, possess, sell, deliver, distribute, dispense, and lawfully dispose of marijuana or a marijuana delivery device as provided in this section, s. 381.988, and by department rule. For the purposes of this subsection, the terms “manufacture,” “possession,” “deliver,” “distribute,” and “dispense” have the same meanings as provided in s. 893.02.
(d) Notwithstanding s. 893.13, s. 893.135, s. 893.147, or any other provision of law, but subject to the requirements of this section, a certified marijuana testing laboratory, including an employee of a certified marijuana testing laboratory acting within the scope of his or her employment, may acquire, possess, test, transport, and lawfully dispose of marijuana as provided in this section, in s. 381.988, and by department rule.
(e) Notwithstanding s. 893.13, s. 893.135, s. 893.147, or any other law, but subject to the requirements of this section, the department, including an employee of the department acting within the scope of his or her employment, may acquire, possess, test, transport, and lawfully dispose of marijuana and marijuana delivery devices as provided in this section, in s. 381.988, and by department rule.
(f) A licensed medical marijuana treatment center and its owners, managers, and employees are not subject to licensure or regulation under chapter 465 or chapter 499 for manufacturing, possessing, selling, delivering, distributing, dispensing, or lawfully disposing of marijuana or a marijuana delivery device, as provided in this section, in s. 381.988, and by department rule.
(g) This subsection does not exempt a person from prosecution for a criminal offense related to impairment or intoxication resulting from the medical use of marijuana or relieve a person from any requirement under law to submit to a breath, blood, urine, or other test to detect the presence of a controlled substance.
(h) Notwithstanding s. 893.13, s. 893.135, s. 893.147, or any other provision of law, but subject to the requirements of this section and pursuant to policies and procedures established pursuant to s. 1006.062(8), school personnel may possess marijuana that is obtained for medical use pursuant to this section by a student who is a qualified patient.
(i) Notwithstanding s. 893.13, s. 893.135, s. 893.147, or any other provision of law, but subject to the requirements of this section, a research institute established by a public postsecondary educational institution, such as the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Inc., established under s. 1004.43, or a state university that has achieved the preeminent state research university designation under s. 1001.7065 may possess, test, transport, and lawfully dispose of marijuana for research purposes as provided by this section.
(15) APPLICABILITY.—
(a) This section does not limit the ability of an employer to establish, continue, or enforce a drug-free workplace program or policy.
(b) This section does not require an employer to accommodate the medical use of marijuana in any workplace or any employee working while under the influence of marijuana.
(c) This section does not create a cause of action against an employer for wrongful discharge or discrimination.
(d) This section does not impair the ability of any party to restrict or limit smoking or vaping marijuana on his or her private property.
(e) This section does not prohibit the medical use of marijuana or a caregiver assisting with the medical use of marijuana in a nursing home facility licensed under part II of chapter 400, a hospice facility licensed under part IV of chapter 400, or an assisted living facility licensed under part I of chapter 429, if the medical use of marijuana is not prohibited in the facility’s policies.
(f) Marijuana, as defined in this section, is not reimbursable under chapter 440.
(16) FINES AND FEES.—Fines and fees collected by the department under this section shall be deposited in the Grants and Donations Trust Fund within the Department of Health.
3(17) Rules adopted pursuant to this section before July 1, 2026, are not subject to ss. 120.54(3)(b) and 120.541. This subsection expires July 1, 2026.
History.—s. 2, ch. 2014-157; s. 1, ch. 2016-123; s. 24, ch. 2016-145; ss. 1, 3, 18, ch. 2017-232; s. 29, ch. 2018-10; s. 43, ch. 2018-110; s. 1, ch. 2018-142; s. 1, ch. 2019-1; s. 39, ch. 2019-116; s. 85, ch. 2020-2; s. 31, ch. 2020-114; s. 13, ch. 2021-37; s. 7, ch. 2021-52; ss. 3, 4, ch. 2022-71; s. 17, ch. 2022-157; s. 2, ch. 2023-71; s. 10, ch. 2023-240; s. 1, ch. 2023-292; s. 32, ch. 2024-2; s. 9, ch. 2024-228; s. 4, ch. 2025-114; s. 14, ch. 2025-199; s. 4, ch. 2025-204.
1Note.—
A. Section 1, ch. 2017-232, provides that “[i]t is the intent of the Legislature to implement s. 29, Article X of the State Constitution by creating a unified regulatory structure. If s. 29, Article X of the State Constitution is amended or a constitutional amendment related to cannabis or marijuana is adopted, this act shall expire 6 months after the effective date of such amendment.” If such amendment or adoption takes place, s. 381.986, as amended by s. 1, ch. 2017-232, will read:
381.986 Compassionate use of low-THC and medical cannabis.—
(1) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this section, the term:
(a) “Cannabis delivery device” means an object used, intended for use, or designed for use in preparing, storing, ingesting, inhaling, or otherwise introducing low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis into the human body.
(b) “Dispensing organization” means an organization approved by the department to cultivate, process, transport, and dispense low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis pursuant to this section.
(c) “Independent testing laboratory” means a laboratory, including the managers, employees, or contractors of the laboratory, which has no direct or indirect interest in a dispensing organization.
(d) “Legal representative” means the qualified patient’s parent, legal guardian acting pursuant to a court’s authorization as required under s. 744.3215(4), health care surrogate acting pursuant to the qualified patient’s written consent or a court’s authorization as required under s. 765.113, or an individual who is authorized under a power of attorney to make health care decisions on behalf of the qualified patient.
(e) “Low-THC cannabis” means a plant of the genus Cannabis, the dried flowers of which contain 0.8 percent or less of tetrahydrocannabinol and more than 10 percent of cannabidiol weight for weight; the seeds thereof; the resin extracted from any part of such plant; or any compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such plant or its seeds or resin that is dispensed only from a dispensing organization.
(f) “Medical cannabis” means all parts of any plant of the genus Cannabis, whether growing or not; the seeds thereof; the resin extracted from any part of the plant; and every compound, manufacture, sale, derivative, mixture, or preparation of the plant or its seeds or resin that is dispensed only from a dispensing organization for medical use by an eligible patient as defined in s. 499.0295.
(g) “Medical use” means administration of the ordered amount of low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis. The term does not include the:
1. Possession, use, or administration of low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis by smoking.
2. Transfer of low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis to a person other than the qualified patient for whom it was ordered or the qualified patient’s legal representative on behalf of the qualified patient.
3. Use or administration of low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis:
a. On any form of public transportation.
b. In any public place.
c. In a qualified patient’s place of employment, if restricted by his or her employer.
d. In a state correctional institution as defined in s. 944.02 or a correctional institution as defined in s. 944.241.
e. On the grounds of a preschool, primary school, or secondary school.
f. On a school bus or in a vehicle, aircraft, or motorboat.
(h) “Qualified patient” means a resident of this state who has been added to the compassionate use registry by a physician licensed under chapter 458 or chapter 459 to receive low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis from a dispensing organization.
(i) “Smoking” means burning or igniting a substance and inhaling the smoke. Smoking does not include the use of a vaporizer.
(2) PHYSICIAN ORDERING.—A physician is authorized to order low-THC cannabis to treat a qualified patient suffering from cancer or a physical medical condition that chronically produces symptoms of seizures or severe and persistent muscle spasms; order low-THC cannabis to alleviate symptoms of such disease, disorder, or condition, if no other satisfactory alternative treatment options exist for the qualified patient; order medical cannabis to treat an eligible patient as defined in s. 499.0295; or order a cannabis delivery device for the medical use of low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis, only if the physician:
(a) Holds an active, unrestricted license as a physician under chapter 458 or an osteopathic physician under chapter 459;
(b) Has treated the patient for at least 3 months immediately preceding the patient’s registration in the compassionate use registry;
(c) Has successfully completed the course and examination required under paragraph (4)(a);
(d) Has determined that the risks of treating the patient with low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis are reasonable in light of the potential benefit to the patient. If a patient is younger than 18 years of age, a second physician must concur with this determination, and such determination must be documented in the patient’s medical record;
(e) Registers as the orderer of low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis for the named patient on the compassionate use registry maintained by the department and updates the registry to reflect the contents of the order, including the amount of low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis that will provide the patient with not more than a 45-day supply and a cannabis delivery device needed by the patient for the medical use of low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis. The physician must also update the registry within 7 days after any change is made to the original order to reflect the change. The physician shall deactivate the registration of the patient and the patient’s legal representative when treatment is discontinued;
(f) Maintains a patient treatment plan that includes the dose, route of administration, planned duration, and monitoring of the patient’s symptoms and other indicators of tolerance or reaction to the low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis;
(g) Submits the patient treatment plan quarterly to the University of Florida College of Pharmacy for research on the safety and efficacy of low-THC cannabis and medical cannabis on patients;
(h) Obtains the voluntary written informed consent of the patient or the patient’s legal representative to treatment with low-THC cannabis after sufficiently explaining the current state of knowledge in the medical community of the effectiveness of treatment of the patient’s condition with low-THC cannabis, the medically acceptable alternatives, and the potential risks and side effects;
(i) Obtains written informed consent as defined in and required under s. 499.0295, if the physician is ordering medical cannabis for an eligible patient pursuant to that section; and
(j) Is not a medical director employed by a dispensing organization.
(3) PENALTIES.—
(a) A physician commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083, if the physician orders low-THC cannabis for a patient without a reasonable belief that the patient is suffering from:
1. Cancer or a physical medical condition that chronically produces symptoms of seizures or severe and persistent muscle spasms that can be treated with low-THC cannabis; or
2. Symptoms of cancer or a physical medical condition that chronically produces symptoms of seizures or severe and persistent muscle spasms that can be alleviated with low-THC cannabis.
(b) A physician commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083, if the physician orders medical cannabis for a patient without a reasonable belief that the patient has a terminal condition as defined in s. 499.0295.
(c) A person who fraudulently represents that he or she has cancer, a physical medical condition that chronically produces symptoms of seizures or severe and persistent muscle spasms, or a terminal condition to a physician for the purpose of being ordered low-THC cannabis, medical cannabis, or a cannabis delivery device by such physician commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(d) An eligible patient as defined in s. 499.0295 who uses medical cannabis, and such patient’s legal representative who administers medical cannabis, in plain view of or in a place open to the general public, on the grounds of a school, or in a school bus, vehicle, aircraft, or motorboat, commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(e) A physician who orders low-THC cannabis, medical cannabis, or a cannabis delivery device and receives compensation from a dispensing organization related to the ordering of low-THC cannabis, medical cannabis, or a cannabis delivery device is subject to disciplinary action under the applicable practice act and s. 456.072(1)(n).
(4) PHYSICIAN EDUCATION.—
(a) Before ordering low-THC cannabis, medical cannabis, or a cannabis delivery device for medical use by a patient in this state, the appropriate board shall require the ordering physician to successfully complete an 8-hour course and subsequent examination offered by the Florida Medical Association or the Florida Osteopathic Medical Association that encompasses the clinical indications for the appropriate use of low-THC cannabis and medical cannabis, the appropriate cannabis delivery devices, the contraindications for such use, and the relevant state and federal laws governing the ordering, dispensing, and possessing of these substances and devices. The course and examination shall be administered at least annually. Successful completion of the course may be used by a physician to satisfy 8 hours of the continuing medical education requirements required by his or her respective board for licensure renewal. This course may be offered in a distance learning format.
(b) The appropriate board shall require the medical director of each dispensing organization to hold an active, unrestricted license as a physician under chapter 458 or as an osteopathic physician under chapter 459 and successfully complete a 2-hour course and subsequent examination offered by the Florida Medical Association or the Florida Osteopathic Medical Association that encompasses appropriate safety procedures and knowledge of low-THC cannabis, medical cannabis, and cannabis delivery devices.
(c) Successful completion of the course and examination specified in paragraph (a) is required for every physician who orders low-THC cannabis, medical cannabis, or a cannabis delivery device each time such physician renews his or her license. In addition, successful completion of the course and examination specified in paragraph (b) is required for the medical director of each dispensing organization each time such physician renews his or her license.
(d) A physician who fails to comply with this subsection and who orders low-THC cannabis, medical cannabis, or a cannabis delivery device may be subject to disciplinary action under the applicable practice act and under s. 456.072(1)(k).
(5) DUTIES OF THE DEPARTMENT.—The department shall:
(a) Create and maintain a secure, electronic, and online compassionate use registry for the registration of physicians, patients, and the legal representatives of patients as provided under this section. The registry must be accessible to law enforcement agencies and to a dispensing organization to verify the authorization of a patient or a patient’s legal representative to possess low-THC cannabis, medical cannabis, or a cannabis delivery device and record the low-THC cannabis, medical cannabis, or cannabis delivery device dispensed. The registry must prevent an active registration of a patient by multiple physicians.
(b) Authorize the establishment of five dispensing organizations to ensure reasonable statewide accessibility and availability as necessary for patients registered in the compassionate use registry and who are ordered low-THC cannabis, medical cannabis, or a cannabis delivery device under this section, one in each of the following regions: northwest Florida, northeast Florida, central Florida, southeast Florida, and southwest Florida. The department shall develop an application form and impose an initial application and biennial renewal fee that is sufficient to cover the costs of administering this section. An applicant for approval as a dispensing organization must be able to demonstrate:
1. The technical and technological ability to cultivate and produce low-THC cannabis. The applicant must possess a valid certificate of registration issued by the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services pursuant to s. 581.131 that is issued for the cultivation of more than 400,000 plants, be operated by a nurseryman as defined in s. 581.011, and have been operated as a registered nursery in this state for at least 30 continuous years.
2. The ability to secure the premises, resources, and personnel necessary to operate as a dispensing organization.
3. The ability to maintain accountability of all raw materials, finished products, and any byproducts to prevent diversion or unlawful access to or possession of these substances.
4. An infrastructure reasonably located to dispense low-THC cannabis to registered patients statewide or regionally as determined by the department.
5. The financial ability to maintain operations for the duration of the 2-year approval cycle, including the provision of certified financials to the department. Upon approval, the applicant must post a $5 million performance bond. However, upon a dispensing organization’s serving at least 1,000 qualified patients, the dispensing organization is only required to maintain a $2 million performance bond.
6. That all owners and managers have been fingerprinted and have successfully passed a level 2 background screening pursuant to s. 435.04.
7. The employment of a medical director to supervise the activities of the dispensing organization.
(c) Upon the registration of 250,000 active qualified patients in the compassionate use registry, approve three dispensing organizations, including, but not limited to, an applicant that is a recognized class member of Pigford v. Glickman, 185 F.R.D. 82 (D.D.C. 1999), or In Re Black Farmers Litig., 856 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2011), and a member of the Black Farmers and Agriculturalists Association, which must meet the requirements of subparagraphs (b)2.-7. and demonstrate the technical and technological ability to cultivate and produce low-THC cannabis.
(d) Allow a dispensing organization to make a wholesale purchase of low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis from, or a distribution of low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis to, another dispensing organization.
(e) Monitor physician registration and ordering of low-THC cannabis, medical cannabis, or a cannabis delivery device for ordering practices that could facilitate unlawful diversion or misuse of low-THC cannabis, medical cannabis, or a cannabis delivery device and take disciplinary action as indicated.
(6) DISPENSING ORGANIZATION.—An approved dispensing organization must, at all times, maintain compliance with the criteria demonstrated for selection and approval as a dispensing organization under subsection (5) and the criteria required in this subsection.
(a) When growing low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis, a dispensing organization:
1. May use pesticides determined by the department, after consultation with the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, to be safely applied to plants intended for human consumption, but may not use pesticides designated as restricted-use pesticides pursuant to s. 487.042.
2. Must grow low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis within an enclosed structure and in a room separate from any other plant.
3. Must inspect seeds and growing plants for plant pests that endanger or threaten the horticultural and agricultural interests of the state, notify the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services within 10 calendar days after a determination that a plant is infested or infected by such plant pest, and implement and maintain phytosanitary policies and procedures.
4. Must perform fumigation or treatment of plants, or the removal and destruction of infested or infected plants, in accordance with chapter 581 and any rules adopted thereunder.
(b) When processing low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis, a dispensing organization must:
1. Process the low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis within an enclosed structure and in a room separate from other plants or products.
2. Test the processed low-THC cannabis and medical cannabis before they are dispensed. Results must be verified and signed by two dispensing organization employees. Before dispensing low-THC cannabis, the dispensing organization must determine that the test results indicate that the low-THC cannabis meets the definition of low-THC cannabis and, for medical cannabis and low-THC cannabis, that all medical cannabis and low-THC cannabis is safe for human consumption and free from contaminants that are unsafe for human consumption. The dispensing organization must retain records of all testing and samples of each homogenous batch of cannabis and low-THC cannabis for at least 9 months. The dispensing organization must contract with an independent testing laboratory to perform audits on the dispensing organization’s standard operating procedures, testing records, and samples and provide the results to the department to confirm that the low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis meets the requirements of this section and that the medical cannabis and low-THC cannabis is safe for human consumption.
3. Package the low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis in compliance with the United States Poison Prevention Packaging Act of 1970, 15 U.S.C. ss. 1471 et seq.
4. Package the low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis in a receptacle that has a firmly affixed and legible label stating the following information:
a. A statement that the low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis meets the requirements of subparagraph 2.;
b. The name of the dispensing organization from which the medical cannabis or low-THC cannabis originates; and
c. The batch number and harvest number from which the medical cannabis or low-THC cannabis originates.
5. Reserve two processed samples from each batch and retain such samples for at least 9 months for the purpose of testing pursuant to the audit required under subparagraph 2.
(c) When dispensing low-THC cannabis, medical cannabis, or a cannabis delivery device, a dispensing organization:
1. May not dispense more than a 45-day supply of low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis to a patient or the patient’s legal representative.
2. Must have the dispensing organization’s employee who dispenses the low-THC cannabis, medical cannabis, or a cannabis delivery device enter into the compassionate use registry his or her name or unique employee identifier.
3. Must verify in the compassionate use registry that a physician has ordered the low-THC cannabis, medical cannabis, or a specific type of a cannabis delivery device for the patient.
4. May not dispense or sell any other type of cannabis, alcohol, or illicit drug-related product, including pipes, bongs, or wrapping papers, other than a physician-ordered cannabis delivery device required for the medical use of low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis, while dispensing low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis.
5. Must verify that the patient has an active registration in the compassionate use registry, the patient or patient’s legal representative holds a valid and active registration card, the order presented matches the order contents as recorded in the registry, and the order has not already been filled.
6. Must, upon dispensing the low-THC cannabis, medical cannabis, or cannabis delivery device, record in the registry the date, time, quantity, and form of low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis dispensed and the type of cannabis delivery device dispensed.
(d) To ensure the safety and security of its premises and any off-site storage facilities, and to maintain adequate controls against the diversion, theft, and loss of low-THC cannabis, medical cannabis, or cannabis delivery devices, a dispensing organization shall:
1.a. Maintain a fully operational security alarm system that secures all entry points and perimeter windows and is equipped with motion detectors; pressure switches; and duress, panic, and hold-up alarms; or
b. Maintain a video surveillance system that records continuously 24 hours each day and meets at least one of the following criteria:
(I) Cameras are fixed in a place that allows for the clear identification of persons and activities in controlled areas of the premises. Controlled areas include grow rooms, processing rooms, storage rooms, disposal rooms or areas, and point-of-sale rooms;
(II) Cameras are fixed in entrances and exits to the premises, which shall record from both indoor and outdoor, or ingress and egress, vantage points;
(III) Recorded images must clearly and accurately display the time and date; or
(IV) Retain video surveillance recordings for a minimum of 45 days or longer upon the request of a law enforcement agency.
2. Ensure that the organization’s outdoor premises have sufficient lighting from dusk until dawn.
3. Establish and maintain a tracking system approved by the department that traces the low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis from seed to sale. The tracking system shall include notification of key events as determined by the department, including when cannabis seeds are planted, when cannabis plants are harvested and destroyed, and when low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis is transported, sold, stolen, diverted, or lost.
4. Not dispense from its premises low-THC cannabis, medical cannabis, or a cannabis delivery device between the hours of 9 p.m. and 7 a.m., but may perform all other operations and deliver low-THC cannabis and medical cannabis to qualified patients 24 hours each day.
5. Store low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis in a secured, locked room or a vault.
6. Require at least two of its employees, or two employees of a security agency with whom it contracts, to be on the premises at all times.
7. Require each employee to wear a photo identification badge at all times while on the premises.
8. Require each visitor to wear a visitor’s pass at all times while on the premises.
9. Implement an alcohol and drug-free workplace policy.
10. Report to local law enforcement within 24 hours after it is notified or becomes aware of the theft, diversion, or loss of low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis.
(e) To ensure the safe transport of low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis to dispensing organization facilities, independent testing laboratories, or patients, the dispensing organization must:
1. Maintain a transportation manifest, which must be retained for at least 1 year.
2. Ensure only vehicles in good working order are used to transport low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis.
3. Lock low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis in a separate compartment or container within the vehicle.
4. Require at least two persons to be in a vehicle transporting low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis, and require at least one person to remain in the vehicle while the low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis is being delivered.
5. Provide specific safety and security training to employees transporting or delivering low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis.
(7) DEPARTMENT AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITIES.—
(a) The department may conduct announced or unannounced inspections of dispensing organizations to determine compliance with this section or rules adopted pursuant to this section.
(b) The department shall inspect a dispensing organization upon complaint or notice provided to the department that the dispensing organization has dispensed low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis containing any mold, bacteria, or other contaminant that may cause or has caused an adverse effect to human health or the environment.
(c) The department shall conduct at least a biennial inspection of each dispensing organization to evaluate the dispensing organization’s records, personnel, equipment, processes, security measures, sanitation practices, and quality assurance practices.
(d) The department may enter into interagency agreements with the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, the Department of Business and Professional Regulation, the Department of Transportation, the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, and the Agency for Health Care Administration, and such agencies are authorized to enter into an interagency agreement with the department, to conduct inspections or perform other responsibilities assigned to the department under this section.
(e) The department must make a list of all approved dispensing organizations and qualified ordering physicians and medical directors publicly available on its website.
(f) The department may establish a system for issuing and renewing registration cards for patients and their legal representatives, establish the circumstances under which the cards may be revoked by or must be returned to the department, and establish fees to implement such system. The department must require, at a minimum, the registration cards to:
1. Provide the name, address, and date of birth of the patient or legal representative.
2. Have a full-face, passport-type, color photograph of the patient or legal representative taken within the 90 days immediately preceding registration.
3. Identify whether the cardholder is a patient or legal representative.
4. List a unique numeric identifier for the patient or legal representative that is matched to the identifier used for such person in the department’s compassionate use registry.
5. Provide the expiration date, which shall be 1 year after the date of the physician’s initial order of low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis.
6. For the legal representative, provide the name and unique numeric identifier of the patient that the legal representative is assisting.
7. Be resistant to counterfeiting or tampering.
(g) The department may impose reasonable fines not to exceed $10,000 on a dispensing organization for any of the following violations:
1. Violating this section, s. 499.0295, or department rule.
2. Failing to maintain qualifications for approval.
3. Endangering the health, safety, or security of a qualified patient.
4. Improperly disclosing personal and confidential information of the qualified patient.
5. Attempting to procure dispensing organization approval by bribery, fraudulent misrepresentation, or extortion.
6. Being convicted or found guilty of, or entering a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to, regardless of adjudication, a crime in any jurisdiction which directly relates to the business of a dispensing organization.
7. Making or filing a report or record that the dispensing organization knows to be false.
8. Willfully failing to maintain a record required by this section or department rule.
9. Willfully impeding or obstructing an employee or agent of the department in the furtherance of his or her official duties.
10. Engaging in fraud or deceit, negligence, incompetence, or misconduct in the business practices of a dispensing organization.
11. Making misleading, deceptive, or fraudulent representations in or related to the business practices of a dispensing organization.
12. Having a license or the authority to engage in any regulated profession, occupation, or business that is related to the business practices of a dispensing organization suspended, revoked, or otherwise acted against by the licensing authority of any jurisdiction, including its agencies or subdivisions, for a violation that would constitute a violation under Florida law.
13. Violating a lawful order of the department or an agency of the state, or failing to comply with a lawfully issued subpoena of the department or an agency of the state.
(h) The department may suspend, revoke, or refuse to renew a dispensing organization’s approval if a dispensing organization commits any of the violations in paragraph (g).
(i) The department shall renew the approval of a dispensing organization biennially if the dispensing organization meets the requirements of this section and pays the biennial renewal fee.
(j) The department may adopt rules necessary to implement this section.
(8) PREEMPTION.—
(a) All matters regarding the regulation of the cultivation and processing of medical cannabis or low-THC cannabis by dispensing organizations are preempted to the state.
(b) A municipality may determine by ordinance the criteria for the number and location of, and other permitting requirements that do not conflict with state law or department rule for, dispensing facilities of dispensing organizations located within its municipal boundaries. A county may determine by ordinance the criteria for the number, location, and other permitting requirements that do not conflict with state law or department rule for all dispensing facilities of dispensing organizations located within the unincorporated areas of that county.
(9) EXCEPTIONS TO OTHER LAWS.—
(a) Notwithstanding s. 893.13, s. 893.135, s. 893.147, or any other provision of law, but subject to the requirements of this section, a qualified patient and the qualified patient’s legal representative may purchase and possess for the patient’s medical use up to the amount of low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis ordered for the patient, but not more than a 45-day supply, and a cannabis delivery device ordered for the patient.
(b) Notwithstanding s. 893.13, s. 893.135, s. 893.147, or any other provision of law, but subject to the requirements of this section, an approved dispensing organization and its owners, managers, and employees may manufacture, possess, sell, deliver, distribute, dispense, and lawfully dispose of reasonable quantities, as established by department rule, of low-THC cannabis, medical cannabis, or a cannabis delivery device. For purposes of this subsection, the terms “manufacture,” “possession,” “deliver,” “distribute,” and “dispense” have the same meanings as provided in s. 893.02.
(c) Notwithstanding s. 893.13, s. 893.135, s. 893.147, or any other provision of law, but subject to the requirements of this section, an approved independent testing laboratory may possess, test, transport, and lawfully dispose of low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis as provided by department rule.
(d) An approved dispensing organization and its owners, managers, and employees are not subject to licensure or regulation under chapter 465 or chapter 499 for manufacturing, possessing, selling, delivering, distributing, dispensing, or lawfully disposing of reasonable quantities, as established by department rule, of low-THC cannabis, medical cannabis, or a cannabis delivery device.
(e) An approved dispensing organization that continues to meet the requirements for approval is presumed to be registered with the department and to meet the regulations adopted by the department or its successor agency for the purpose of dispensing medical cannabis or low-THC cannabis under Florida law. Additionally, the authority provided to a dispensing organization in s. 499.0295 does not impair the approval of a dispensing organization.
(f) This subsection does not exempt a person from prosecution for a criminal offense related to impairment or intoxication resulting from the medical use of low-THC cannabis or medical cannabis or relieve a person from any requirement under law to submit to a breath, blood, urine, or other test to detect the presence of a controlled substance.
B. Section 16, ch. 2025-199, provides that “[t]he amendments to subsection (1) of section 14 of chapter 2017-232, Laws of Florida, made by this act expire January 1, 2026, and the text of that subsection shall revert to that in existence on June 30, 2019, except that any amendments to such text enacted other than by this act shall be preserved and continue to operate to the extent that such amendments are not dependent upon the portions of text which expire pursuant to this section.” Effective January 1, 2026, s. 14(1), ch. 2017-232, as amended by s. 16, ch. 2025-199, will read:
“(1) EMERGENCY RULEMAKING.—
“(a) The Department of Health and the applicable boards shall adopt emergency rules pursuant to s. 120.54(4), Florida Statutes, and this section necessary to implement ss. 381.986 and 381.988, Florida Statutes. If an emergency rule adopted under this section is held to be unconstitutional or an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority, and becomes void, the department or the applicable boards may adopt an emergency rule pursuant to this section to replace the rule that has become void. If the emergency rule adopted to replace the void emergency rule is also held to be unconstitutional or an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority and becomes void, the department and the applicable boards must follow the nonemergency rulemaking procedures of the Administrative Procedures Act to replace the rule that has become void.
“(b) For emergency rules adopted under this section, the department and the applicable boards need not make the findings required by s. 120.54(4)(a), Florida Statutes. Emergency rules adopted under this section are exempt from ss. 120.54(3)(b) and 120.541, Florida Statutes. The department and the applicable boards shall meet the procedural requirements in s. 120.54(a), Florida Statutes, if the department or the applicable boards have, before [June 23, 2017], held any public workshops or hearings on the subject matter of the emergency rules adopted under this subsection. Challenges to emergency rules adopted under this subsection are subject to the time schedules provided in s. 120.56(5), Florida Statutes.
“(c) Emergency rules adopted under this section are exempt from s. 120.54(4)(c), Florida Statutes, and shall remain in effect until replaced by rules adopted under the nonemergency rulemaking procedures of the Administrative Procedures Act. By January 1, 2018, the department and the applicable boards shall initiate nonemergency rulemaking pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act to replace all emergency rules adopted under this section by publishing a notice of rule development in the Florida Administrative Register. Except as provided in paragraph (a), after January 1, 2018, the department and applicable boards may not adopt rules pursuant to the emergency rulemaking procedures provided in this section.”
2Note.—Section 17, ch. 2025-114, provides that “[e]xcept as otherwise expressly provided in this act and except for this section, which shall take effect upon this act becoming a law, or, if this act fails to become a law until after June 1, 2025, it shall take effect upon becoming a law and shall operate retroactively to June 1, 2025, this act shall take effect July 1, 2025.”
3Note.—Section 14, ch. 2025-199, amended subsection (17) “[i]n order to implement Specific Appropriations 461 through 469A of the 2025-2026 General Appropriations Act.”
As used in these rules, the following shall mean:
(1)
'Board' means the Georgia Composite Medical Board.
(2)
'Department' means the Department of Public Health.
(3)
'Low THC oil' means an oil that contains not more than 5 percent by weight of tetrahydrocannabinol and an amount of cannabinol equal to or greater than the amount of tetrahydrocannabinol.
(4)
'Physician' means an individual licensed to practice medicine pursuant to Article 2 of Chapter 34 of Title 43.
(5)
'Registry' means the Low THC Oil Patient Registry.
(6)
'Doctor-patient relationship' means the physician must be the patient's primary care or specialist physician treating the patient for the specific condition requiring treatment by Low THC oil, and must be maintaining patient records supporting the diagnosis and treatment of the patient.
(7)
'Caregiver' means the parent, guardian, or legal custodian of an individual who is less than 18 years of age or the legal guardian of an adult.
(8)
'Condition' means for the purpose of those conditions listed in O.C.G.A. 31-2A-18(a)(3).
(1)
In order to register a patient with the Department, the physician must:
(a)
Hold an active license to practice medicine in the State of Georgia;
(b)
Have a doctor-patient relationship with the patient;
(c)
Have determined that the patient has a condition that qualifies for Low THC oil under the law;
(d)
Be treating the patient for the condition; and
(e)
Have provided the patient with a Board-approved waiver form and the patient must have signed the form.
(2)
The physician must provide the following information to the Department:
(a)
The name and address of a patient and, if appropriate, the name and address of the patient's caregiver;
(b)
The medical condition of the patient and how long the patient has been diagnosed with the condition;
(c)
Whether the patient qualifies for the use of low THC oil under the law;
(d)
The length of time the physician has been treating the patient;
(e)
What other treatments has the patient had for the condition; and
(f)
Certification that the physician has a doctor-patient relationship with the patient.
(3)
The physician must keep a copy of the physician certification in the patient's medical record.
The physician shall provide to the patient a copy of the waiver form approved by the Board advising that the use of cannabinoids and THC-containing products have not been approved by the FDA and the clinical benefits are unknown and may cause harm. A signed copy of this form shall be maintained in the patient record and shall be submitted to the Department of Public Health along with the certification form for registration. The approved Board form may be found at http://dph.georgia.gov/low-thc-oil-registry.
(1)
Physicians certifying patients to the Department for Low THC oil shall make semi-annual reports to the Board by filing the report online at http://dph.georgia.gov/low-thc-oil-registry. The reports should be submitted within ten (10) days of the reporting period April and October. Such reports shall require physicians to provide information, including, but not limited to:
(a)
Name, address, and contact information for the physician;
(b)
Unique patient number from the registration card;
(c)
Condition being treated;
(d)
Amount or concentration of THC oil reported by the patient;
(e)
Drug interactions, if any;
(f)
Adverse effects, if any;
(g)
If the physician is still treating the patient, and if not, why; and
(h)
Patient compliance with treatment.
(2)
Information obtained from the semi-annual reports are confidential.
(3)
Physicians that are no longer seeing the patients can notify the Board before the next semi-annual report is due by submitting the report early in writing.
(4)
Failure to submit the reports as required herein will be reported to the Department and may affect the physician's eligibility to participate on the registry.
(5)
A physician should maintain a copy of each semi-annual report in the patient's medical record.
Failure to comply with the rules and regulations of the Board is grounds for disciplinary action by the Board under O.C.G.A. Section 43-34-8.
Focus: Dosing Potency and Options
Note: Georgia restricts products to low-THC (≤5% THC, CBD ≥ THC) oils/tinctures for specific conditions; no flower, vapes, or edibles. Florida offers full-spectrum, high-THC products with flexible dosing. Product availability varies; check dispensary for current stock.
Georgia
Momenta Lemon Ginger Tincture
Potency: <5% THC, 1:20 CBD:THC (~27mg CBD, ~1.4mg THC/ml)
Dosing: 0.25-0.5ml (0.5-1mg THC, 10-20mg CBD), 1-2x/day
Low THC Oil Syringe
Potency: 4-5% THC, 20:1 CBD:THC (~800mg CBD, ~40mg THC/g)
Dosing: 25mg drops (1mg THC, 20mg CBD), up to 4x/day
Ratio Tincture
Potency: <3% THC, 10:1 CBD:THC (500mg total)
Dosing: 0.5ml (2.5mg THC, 25mg CBD), 2x/day
Florida
Trulieve Ratio Tincture
Potency: 50% THC, 1:1 CBD:THC (250mg each)
Dosing: 0.25ml (5mg THC/CBD), 2x/day; scalable to 10-20mg
TruClear Distillate Syringe (e.g., 9lb Hammer)
Potency: 85% THC (850mg THC/g)
Dosing: 0.06g (5mg THC), 2x/day; 30-70 day supply
Modern Flower Chem Juice Syringe
Potency: 85% THC (850mg THC/g)
Dosing: 25.5mg (25mg THC), 33 doses/syringe
Georgia
CBD Capsules
Potency: <2% THC, 25mg CBD, <1mg THC/capsule
Dosing: 1 capsule (25mg CBD), 1-2x/day; 2-4hr onset
Florida
Trulieve Ratio Capsules
Potency: 50% THC, 1:1 (25mg THC + 25mg CBD/capsule)
Dosing: 1 capsule (50mg total), 2x/day; 30-day supply
THC Capsules
Potency: 80% THC (25mg THC/capsule)
Dosing: 0.5 capsule (12.5mg), up to 2 (50mg)/day
Georgia
Not available (smokable forms prohibited)
Florida
Roll One Dream Queen Whole Flower
Potency: 18-22% THC, indica-dominant
Dosing: 3-sec puff (3.9-6.9mg THC), 5-10 puffs/session
Sunshine State OG Whole Flower
Potency: 20-25% THC, hybrid
Dosing: 5mg THC/puff, 2x/day; 30-day supply
Earthquake Whole Flower
Potency: 22-28% THC, sativa
Dosing: 5mg THC/puff, 2x/day; quick onset
Georgia
Not available (infused foods prohibited)
Florida
Delizioso Minis
Potency: 70-80% THC, 10mg THC/piece
Dosing: 1 piece (10mg), wait 2hrs; up to 2-3/day
Chocolates/Gels
Potency: 50-70% THC, 5-10mg THC/serving
Dosing: Start 2.5mg, max 10mg/session; 1-2hr onset
Georgia
Not available (inhalable products prohibited)
Florida
TruPOD Vape Cartridges
Potency: 70-85% THC (e.g., Granddaddy Purple)
Dosing: 1-2 puffs (2-5mg THC), 50-100 puffs/cartridge
Live Resin Carts
Potency: 80-90% THC, full-spectrum
Dosing: 3-sec draw (4-7mg THC), 30-50 sessions
Georgia
Low-THC Balms/Lotions
Potency: <1% THC, 100mg CBD/jar
Dosing: Dime-sized (5-10mg CBD), 2-3x/day; 5-20min absorption
Florida
THC/CBD Topicals
Potency: 10-20% THC, 1:1 (50-100mg THC/CBD)
Dosing: Pea-sized (5-10mg), as needed; non-intoxicating
Georgia: Low-THC (≤5%) oils only; registry card for 21+ conditions; no inhalation/edibles
Florida: High-THC products; up to 2.5oz flower/35g equivalent monthly; physician recommendation required
Week 4 — Cancer & Complex Pain
Advanced Cancer RCT — 1:1 THC:CBD Oil (Double-blind, 2025)
n=144 randomized. No difference in total symptom burden at day 14; small pain improvement vs placebo with more psychomimetic AEs. Counsel patients on modest analgesia, higher toxicity. PMC
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12289739/
Quebec Cancer Registry (BMJ Support Palliat Care, 2024)
n=358; significant reductions in BPI worst/average pain and ESAS pain to 9–12 months; balanced THC:CBD outperformed THC- or CBD-dominant; opioid/med burden ↓. Mostly non-serious AEs. PubMed
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37130724/
ASCO Guideline (JCO, 2024)
Guideline emphasizes symptom relief discussions, product-specific dosing, monitoring, and not using cannabinoids as cancer-directed therapy outside trials. Shared decision-making and safety checks are key. PubMedASCOPubs
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.23.02596
Narrative Review — Cancer Symptom Management (Cancers, 2024)
Synthesizes pharmacology and clinical data for appetite, pain, nausea/vomiting, insomnia; acknowledges anti-tumor signals are preclinical/insufficient; supports integrated oncology pathways. PMCPubMed
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11352579/
Anticancer Research Update (2024)
Clinical updates suggest balanced THC:CBD may improve pain with better tolerability than THC-only; urges higher-quality RCTs and careful adverse-event monitoring. PubMedIIAR Journals
https://ar.iiarjournals.org/content/44/3/895
Nabiximols in Advanced Cancer — Narrative Synthesis (2024)
Controlled evidence remains mixed; summaries note modest analgesia and no clear opioid-sparing across small RCTs; highlights design/power limitations. PMC
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12289739/
Oncology Cohort — Safety & Symptom Burden (Frontiers, 2022)
Prospective real-world cohort: MC generally safe with non-serious AEs and symptom burden reductions over follow-up; underscores gap in long-term controlled trials. PMCFrontiers
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pain-research/articles/10.3389/fpain.2022.861037/full
Week 5 — Integrative Outcomes (Function, Mood, Sleep, Tapering)
Opioid Dose Trajectories (JAMA Netw Open, 2023)
New York State cohort n=8,165 on long-term opioids: >30-day MC exposure linked to larger monthly MME reductions (dose-response); 47–51% MME ↓ by 8 months vs 4–14% in ≤30-day group. PMC
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2800813
HRQoL Case Series (JAMA Netw Open, 2023)
Australian clinics, n=3,148; significant, sustained improvements across all SF-36 domains after MC initiation; AEs common but rarely serious. Chronic non-cancer pain most common indication. PMCPubMed
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2804653
Sleep & Pain in Chronic Pain (UKMCR, 2024)
n=1,139 chronic pain patients stratified by baseline sleep impairment; CBMPs improved sleep and pain over 12 months; AE incidence comparable across strata; exploratory OME data reported. PMC
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11683519/
Insomnia Cohort on CBMPs (PLOS Mental Health, 2025)
UKMCR insomnia cohort shows clinically meaningful sleep quality gains and HRQoL improvement up to 18 months; AEs mostly mild/moderate; emphasizes need for controlled trials. PLOS+1
https://journals.plos.org/mentalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmen.0000390
CBD 150 mg Nightly — Primary Insomnia RCT (2024)
n=30; two-week parallel RCT. Objective sleep efficiency ↑ and well-being ↑ with CBD vs placebo; most other sleep endpoints neutral; safety acceptable. PMCPubMed
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11063694/
Real-World Pain + QoL (Drug Sci Policy Law, 2023)
Three-month data showed pain severity/interference ↓ and QoL ↑ after MC initiation; balanced products often performed best; sample sizes modest; longer follow-up needed. SAGE JournalsDrug Science
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/20503245231172535
Anxiety/Sleep Overlap (UKMCR GAD Cohort, 2023)
n=302 GAD patients on CBMPs: GAD-7 ↓ ~5 points by 1–3 months; sleep and EQ-5D ↑; AEs mostly mild/moderate. Supports pain’s emotional component in integrative care. PubMed
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37314478/
Definition: RSO is a high-THC full-extract cannabis oil (50–70% THC), often unstandardized.
Origins: Popularized by Rick Simpson, a Canadian engineer, for self-treatment of skin cancer.
Current Use: Widely sought by cancer patients globally for symptom control and perceived anticancer effects.
Cannabinoids: THC dominant; variable CBD, minor cannabinoids (CBG, CBC), and terpenes.
Mechanism:
THC: CB1 agonist → analgesia, antiemesis, appetite stimulation.
CB2 / entourage: potential anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and pro-apoptotic actions (preclinical).
Challenges: Potency variability, extraction solvents, contaminant risk (residual hydrocarbons, heavy metals).
Preclinical: THC and CBD inhibit proliferation, induce apoptosis, reduce angiogenesis in lab/animal cancer models.
Clinical:
Nabiximols and oral THC (20–40 mg/day) reduce cancer pain, spasticity, and opioid use.
No randomized controlled trials of RSO specifically in cancer patients.
Observational: Some cancer patients use RSO; small minority discontinue standard therapies, raising safety concerns.
Initiation: “Grain of rice” size (~25–30 mg THC), 3× daily.
Titration: Double dose every 4–7 days until tolerance established.
Target: Up to ~1 g/day (≈600–700 mg THC).
Protocol (popularized): 60 g over 90 days; unvalidated, high risk.
Pharmacist/Clinician Note: No evidence-based dosing—use caution, prioritize symptom relief, monitor closely.
Acute: Sedation, dizziness, orthostatic hypotension, anxiety, dysphoria.
Chronic: Tolerance, dependence, cognitive impairment.
Drug Interactions: CYP450 metabolism (notably CYP3A4, CYP2C9); interactions with chemotherapy, analgesics, psychotropics.
Patient Risk: Misuse as curative alternative → delays in evidence-based cancer care.
Symptom Management Role: Potential in pain, sleep, appetite, nausea.
Anticancer Role: Preclinical only; no proven curative effect.
Counseling: Encourage use alongside—not instead of—standard therapy.
Global Perspective: Some countries (Canada, Israel, Germany) allow physician-guided cannabis oils; others restrict high-THC oils.
RSO = concentrated, THC-dominant extract with global patient demand.
Evidence supports symptom relief, not cancer cure.
Dosing protocols are anecdotal; start low, titrate cautiously.
Pharmacist role = ensure product safety, dose guidance, and monitor interactions.
Physician role = align use with oncology care, avoid replacing standard therapies.
⚕️ Summary: RSO is a high-potency cannabis extract with potential supportive care benefits for cancer patients but no proven anticancer efficacy. Pharmacists and doctors should counsel patients on safe, supervised use, manage risks, and integrate cannabis care within evidence-based oncology.
ADDITIONAL EDUCATION IN PROGRESS...
Prevalence & Demographics
19% of Americans (52.5 million people) used cannabis at least once in 2021
Primary medical cannabis use reasons: pain (64%), anxiety (50%), and depression/mood disorders (34%)
Only 9% of medical schools include medical cannabis content in their curriculum
Cannabis Use Disorder Risk
Approximately 3 in 10 people who use cannabis develop cannabis use disorder
29% prevalence of cannabis use disorders among medical cannabis users (DSM-5 criteria)
Therapeutic Benefits
Meta-analyses covering 1,629 mental health participants establish safety and efficacy
Documented efficacy for anxiety disorders, PTSD, and chronic pain with comorbid depression
CBD-dominant formulations show promise for anxiety without psychoactive effects
Risk Considerations
Teens using recreational cannabis are 2-4 times more likely to develop psychiatric disorders, depression, and suicidality
Adult cannabis use associated with higher odds of developing depression (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.05-1.30)
Higher THC potency linked to increased psychosis risk, particularly in vulnerable populations
Patient Assessment Framework
Screen for personal/family history of psychotic disorders, substance use disorders
Assess age of first use (onset <18 years increases risk)
Evaluate current mental health status and medications
All patients should be educated on risks and adverse events before initiating treatment
Dosing & Administration
Start low, go slow: Begin with lowest effective dose
CBD:THC ratios: Higher CBD ratios for anxiety/mood; balanced ratios for pain with mood symptoms
Monitor for 2-4 weeks before dose adjustments
Patients and clinicians should work collaboratively to identify appropriate dosing, titration, and administration routes
Drug Interactions & Contraindications
Potential adverse interactions with analgesic, psychotropic, and cardiovascular medications
Monitor patients on warfarin, seizure medications, and sedatives
Contraindicated in active psychotic disorders, severe cardiovascular disease
Monitoring Parameters
Mental status changes, mood stability, cognitive function
Sleep patterns, appetite, social functioning
Signs of cannabis use disorder development
Cannabis can impair short-term memory, judgment, and coordination
Red Flags for Discontinuation
New onset psychotic symptoms or mood destabilization
Increasing tolerance requiring frequent dose escalations
Impaired daily functioning or driving safety concerns
Development of problematic use patterns
Patient Education Essentials
Document informed consent covering infection risk, pulmonary complications, immunity suppression, driving impairment, and habituation potential
Avoid use during pregnancy/breastfeeding
Store securely away from children and pets
Do not drive or operate machinery while using
Professional Development
American College of Physicians Cannabis Guidelines (2024)
Society of Cannabis Clinicians educational materials
State medical society CME programs on medical cannabis
Clinical Decision Support
Use validated screening tools (Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test)
Implement structured follow-up protocols
Collaborate with mental health specialists when indicated
CDC. Cannabis Facts and Stats. Updated March 2025.
https://www.cdc.gov/cannabis/data-research/facts-stats/index.html
CDC. Cannabis Health Effects. Updated May 2024.
https://www.cdc.gov/cannabis/health-effects/index.html
CDC. Cannabis and Teens. Updated February 2025.
https://www.cdc.gov/cannabis/health-effects/cannabis-and-teens.html
CDC. Understanding Your Risk for Cannabis Use Disorder. Updated December 2024.
https://www.cdc.gov/cannabis/health-effects/cannabis-use-disorder.html
Crowley R, Cline K, Hilden D, Beachy M. Regulatory Framework for Cannabis: A Position Paper From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2024;177(8):1104-1105.
https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M24-0638
Drug Abuse Statistics. Marijuana Addiction Statistics [2025]: Usage & Abuse Rates.
https://drugabusestatistics.org/marijuana-addiction/
Additional peer-reviewed studies available through PubMed and PMC databases for specific clinical applications and dosing guidelines.
Medical Cannabis and Mental Health: Key Statistics and Evidence-Based Information
Medical Cannabis and Mental Health: Key Statistics and Evidence-Based Information for Physicians and Educators (2021–2025)
1. Prevalence and Mental Health Burden
• Mental health disorders remain widespread globally, with anxiety, depression, PTSD, bipolar disorder, and psychosis among the most common diagnoses [1-2].
• 54% of cannabis users report using it for mental health symptoms, with highest rates in bipolar disorder and PTSD [2].
2. Medical Cannabis Use: Indications and Evidence
• Most frequent medical cannabis indications are pain, insomnia, anxiety, and mood disorders [3].
• High-quality evidence shows short-term relief for anxiety with high-dose CBD and sleep disturbances. No long-term curative effect has been demonstrated [1][4].
• No FDA-approved psychiatric indications. Evidence is insufficient for cannabinoids as first-line therapy [5].
3. Risks and Adverse Outcomes
• High-THC concentration products are associated with psychosis, schizophrenia, and cannabis use disorder (CUD) [6-7].
• The American College of Physicians reports that high-potency cannabis, especially in young adults or those with mood disorders, increases risk for CUD and adverse effects [7].
• Reported adverse events include acute anxiety, depression, mania (especially in bipolar I), dizziness, sedation, and fall risk in frail patients [7].
• 7% of users seek medical care for adverse effects, with higher rates in psychosis, depression, and bipolar disorder [2].
4. Prevention and Harm Reduction
• THC initiation should be at 1 to 2.5 mg per day with slow titration. Average daily dose is 10 to 20 mg. CBD is used at higher doses greater than 400 mg per day [8].
• High-potency THC should be avoided in patients with psychosis, bipolar disorder, or substance use disorder history [6-7].
• Education is essential for adolescents and patients with psychiatric comorbidity to reduce risk of CUD [7].
5. Community Education and Messaging
• Emphasize disorder-specific risks and benefits. Perceived benefits may not align with clinical evidence [2].
• Promote individualized counseling, evidence-based education, and monitoring for adverse effects and CUD [7].
References
de Bode N, Kroon E, Sznitman SR, Cousijn J. The Differential Effects of Medicinal Cannabis on Mental Health: A Systematic Review. Clinical Psychology Review. 2025;118:102581. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2025.102581
Rup J, Freeman TP, Perlman C, Hammond D. Cannabis and Mental Health: Adverse Outcomes and Self-Reported Impact of Cannabis Use by Mental Health Status. Substance Use & Misuse. 2022;57(5):719-729. doi:10.1080/10826084.2022.2034872
Gilman JM, Schuster RM, Potter KW, et al. Effect of Medical Marijuana Card Ownership on Pain, Insomnia, and Affective Disorder Symptoms in Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Network Open. 2022;5(3):e222106. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2106
Montagner P, de Salas Quiroga A, Ferreira AS, et al. Charting the Therapeutic Landscape: A Comprehensive Evidence Map on Medical Cannabis for Health Outcomes. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2024;15:1494492. doi:10.3389/fphar.2024.1494492
Hill KP, Gold MS, Nemeroff CB, et al. Risks and Benefits of Cannabis and Cannabinoids in Psychiatry. The American Journal of Psychiatry. 2022;179(2):98-109. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2021.21030320
Rittiphairoj T, Leslie L, Oberste JP, et al. High-Concentration Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Cannabis Products and Mental Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2025. doi:10.7326/ANNALS-24-03819
Kansagara D, Hill KP, Yost J, et al. Cannabis or Cannabinoids for the Management of Chronic Noncancer Pain: Best Practice Advice From the American College of Physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2025;178(5):714-724. doi:10.7326/ANNALS-24-03319
Müller-Vahl KR. Cannabinoids in the Treatment of Selected Mental Illnesses: Practical Approach and Overview of the Literature. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2024;57(3):104-114. doi:10.1055/a-2256-0098
Cannabis Use Disorder: DSM-5 Criteria
Diagnosis: ≥2 of 11 symptoms in a 12-month period.
11 Symptoms
Larger/longer: Taken in greater amounts or longer than intended.
Cut-down failure: Persistent desire or unsuccessful attempts to reduce.
Time spent: Excessive time obtaining, using, or recovering.
Craving: Strong desire/urge to use.
Obligations: Recurrent use causing work, school, or home failures.
Social issues: Continued use despite interpersonal conflicts.
Activities reduced: Social, occupational, or recreational activities cut down.
Hazardous use: Use in risky situations (eg driving).
Use despite harm: Continued use despite knowing physical or psychological harm.
Tolerance: Need more for effect or diminished effect with same dose.
Withdrawal: Cannabis withdrawal syndrome or use to avoid it (irritability, anxiety, sleep issues, appetite loss, restlessness).
Severity = • 2–3 symptoms = Mild • 4–5 symptoms = Moderate • ≥6 symptoms = Severe
Clinical Pearls
• Prevalence: Lifetime risk ~9–10% of all users; 25–50% in daily users.
• Comorbidity: Higher in anxiety, depression, PTSD, bipolar, early initiation (<18).
• Screening: CUDIT-R (≥8 hazardous, ≥12 likely CUD); ASSIST for multi-substance.
• Treatment: Motivational interviewing, CBT, contingency management effective.
• Pharmacology: No FDA-approved drug; trials ongoing with gabapentin, nabilone, CBD.
7 Ways to Prevent CUD
Delay initiation until adulthood.
Prefer low-THC, balanced THC:CBD products.
Avoid high-potency concentrates.
Use lowest effective dose, titrate slowly.
Screen high-risk groups (youth, psychiatric illness, family history SUD).
Provide education on CUD risks, tolerance, withdrawal.
Regular monitoring with brief intervention and counseling.
Additional Clinical Information
Epidemiology & Trends = US: ~14.2M adults meet CUD criteria yearly (NSDUH 2022). Youth daily use → 4–7x later CUD risk. THC potency ↑ from ~4% (1995) → >15% (2021). Concentrates >60–90%.
Neurobiology CUD = dysregulation of mesolimbic DA + ECS. High-THC alters CB1 density, reward responsivity, esp in youth brains.
Red Flags Cannabis for anxiety/insomnia vs 1st-line tx. Dose escalation despite adverse effects. “Wake and bake” = high dependence risk.
Special Pops Adolescents: neurodevelopmental vulnerability. Older adults: ↑ falls, sedation, polypharm risk. Psychiatric: bipolar + psychotic disorders = highest complications.
Withdrawal Onset 24–72h, peak 2–6d, lasts ≤2w. Sx: irritability, anxiety, insomnia, ↓ appetite, depressed mood, HA, sweats, chills. Often underrecognized.
Monitoring Screen w/ CUDIT-R or ASSIST baseline + f/u. Track sleep, mood, anxiety, psychosis risk, function. Integrate into PCP + psych visits.
Education Messaging Avoid stigma terms (“addict”), use “CUD.” Many patients seek legit sx relief → weigh risks. Favor harm reduction + shared decision-making > abstinence only.
Standard of Care Treatment Guidelines for Common Mental Health Conditions
1. Major Depressive Disorder = 1st Line: SSRIs (sertraline, escitalopram) or SNRIs (duloxetine); Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) 2nd Line: Bupropion, mirtazapine, tricyclics; Interpersonal Therapy (IPT), psychodynamic therapy
2. Generalized Anxiety Disorder = 1st Line: SSRIs/SNRIs; CBT, mindfulness-based interventions 2nd Line: Buspirone, pregabalin, benzodiazepines (short-term); Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)
3. Panic Disorder = 1st Line: SSRIs, CBT with exposure therapy 2nd Line: SNRIs, benzodiazepines (acute), tricyclics; panic-focused psychodynamic therapy
4. Social Anxiety Disorder = 1st Line: SSRIs, CBT with exposure therapy 2nd Line: SNRIs, MAOIs (phenelzine), beta-blockers (performance anxiety); group CBT
5. Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder = 1st Line: SSRIs (higher doses), Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP) 2nd Line: Clomipramine, SSRI combinations; CBT with ERP, acceptance-based approaches
6. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder = 1st Line: SSRIs/SNRIs, Trauma-Focused CBT, EMDR 2nd Line: Prazosin (nightmares), atypical antipsychotics; Prolonged Exposure Therapy, CPT
7. Bipolar Disorder = 1st Line: Lithium, valproate, atypical antipsychotics (maintenance); psychoeducation, CBT 2nd Line: Carbamazepine, lamotrigine; family-focused therapy, interpersonal rhythm therapy
8. Schizophrenia = 1st Line: Atypical antipsychotics (risperidone, olanzapine, aripiprazole) 2nd Line: Typical antipsychotics, clozapine (treatment-resistant); family therapy, social skills training
9. Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder = 1st Line: Stimulants (methylphenidate, amphetamines), behavioral therapy (children) 2nd Line: Non-stimulants (atomoxetine, guanfacine); CBT, coaching (adults)
10. Borderline Personality Disorder = 1st Line: Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), no specific medication for core features 2nd Line: Mood stabilizers/antipsychotics for specific symptoms; Mentalization-Based Therapy, Schema Therapy
Note: Treatment selection should always consider individual patient factors, comorbidities, and treatment history. Combination therapy (medication + psychotherapy) often provides optimal outcomes.
FAQs
Q1: How is medical cannabis cultivated to ensure quality and safety?
A1: Medical cannabis is typically grown under tightly controlled conditions to meet pharmaceutical-grade standards. Many jurisdictions mandate indoor cultivation with rigorous security and quality controls. For example, Germany’s federal Cannabis Agency licenses growers who demonstrate past experience and secure indoor facilities (with strict access and surveillance) to maintain consistent crop qualitylabiotech.eu. Cultivators must adhere to Good Agricultural and Collection Practices (GACP), and crops undergo testing for potency and contaminants like pesticides, heavy metals, and mold. In Germany, the health authority (BfArM) oversees cultivation and distribution so that patients can rely on a high-quality product; quality-control laboratories check each batch for any banned insecticides and verify THC contentlabiotech.eu. Similarly, in Canada and other programs, only licensed producers meeting exacting standards (e.g. indoor growing, GMP processing) may supply medical cannabis. By regulating light, nutrients, and other factors, growers produce standardized strains with predictable levels of key cannabinoids. Each harvest is sampled and lab-tested before release to ensure it meets safety specifications. These measures ensure that medical cannabis is produced with consistency and free from harmful contaminants, much like other pharmaceutical therapies.
Q2: What are the key chemical components of cannabis and their medical significance?
A2: The cannabis plant contains dozens of cannabinoids, but two primary compounds drive most medical effects: Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD). THC is the principal psychoactive component; it activates cannabinoid receptors (especially CB₁ in the nervous system) to modulate pain, appetite, mood, and morelabiotech.eu. THC’s activation of CB₁ receptors in the spinal cord, for example, can reduce pain perceptionlabiotech.eu. This underlies THC’s use for chronic pain, muscle spasticity, nausea, and appetite loss. CBD is non-intoxicating and interacts with the endocannabinoid system more indirectly. It can temper certain effects of THC and has anti-inflammatory and anticonvulsant properties. Notably, a purified CBD solution has proven effective in drug-resistant childhood epilepsiespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Beyond THC and CBD, cannabis produces minor cannabinoids (like CBG, CBC, THCV) and terpenes (aromatic oils). These may contribute to the so-called “entourage effect,” where the whole-plant extract’s components collectively influence therapeutic outcomes. For instance, products combining THC and CBD (in varying ratios) are thought to balance psychoactivity with symptom relief. In medical practice, THC is associated with analgesia, muscle relaxation, and appetite stimulation, whereas CBD is used for conditions such as seizures or anxiety without causing euphoria. Understanding these components helps clinicians select appropriate cannabis formulations (e.g. high-THC for severe pain vs. CBD-rich for pediatric epilepsy) based on a patient’s needs.
Q3: How are cannabis-based medicines prepared and administered to patients?
A3: Cannabis-based medicines come in several formulations and delivery methods, each suited to different medical contexts. Herbal cannabis (the dried flower) can be dispensed for inhalation, typically via vaporization; this route provides rapid relief (onset within minutes) which is useful for acute symptoms like pain spikes or nausea. Smoking is generally discouraged in medical use due to respiratory risks, and some countries prohibit smoking entirely for medical cannabis (France’s program, for example, allows vaporization but not smoking of dispensed flower)practiceguides.chambers.com. Cannabis oils and extracts are another common preparation: plant cannabinoids are extracted (with solvents or CO₂) and formulated into oil drops, capsules, or edibles. Oral ingestion produces longer-lasting effects (4–8 hours) but with a slower onset (~1 hour) as THC is metabolized to an active form in the liver. These properties benefit patients needing sustained symptom control (e.g. chronic pain or insomnia) but require careful dosing to avoid delayed oversedation. Standardized oral sprays (e.g. nabiximols, a THC/CBD blend) are approved in some regions for conditions like multiple sclerosis spasticity, delivering precise doses to the oral mucosa. There are also pharmaceutical cannabinoids: synthetic THC (dronabinol) and its analog nabilone are available as capsules. These have well-defined doses (e.g. dronabinol 5–20 mg) and have shown analgesic efficacy roughly comparable to moderate opioid doses (about 5–20 mg THC is as effective as 50–120 mg codeine)pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Topical formulations (creams) are less common but are being explored for localized pain and inflammation. All medical cannabis products are prepared under strict pharmaceutical standards – for instance, France’s regulations define “cannabis-based medicinal products” and require that they be manufactured under Good Manufacturing Practice and distributed through pharmaciespracticeguides.chambers.compracticeguides.chambers.com. Physicians choose a preparation and route based on the clinical scenario: rapid-onset vaporized doses for breakthrough symptoms, oral oils or capsules for continuous relief, or specific FDA-approved products (like THC pills or CBD solution) for defined indications. This tailored approach allows cannabis medicines to be integrated into care while controlling dosing, purity, and delivery for patient safety.
Q4: How do THC and CBD interact within the body?
A4: THC and CBD have a complex interplay involving both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions. Pharmacokinetically, CBD can influence how THC is absorbed or metabolized. For example, research in chronic pain patients found that inhaling CBD alongside THC led to higher THC plasma levels – CBD slowed THC’s breakdown, effectively boosting THC exposurepubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Paradoxically, despite raising THC blood concentration (a synergistic PK effect), CBD appeared to reduce some of THC’s effects on pain, indicating an antagonistic pharmacodynamic interactionpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. In that crossover trial with fibromyalgia patients, a THC-rich strain produced significant pressure pain threshold increases, but a THC/CBD mixed strain (similar THC dose with high CBD) did not outperform placebo on pain despite higher THC levels, suggesting CBD may blunt THC’s analgesic efficacypubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
Beyond pain, scientists have examined whether CBD can mitigate THC’s side effects (such as intoxication or cognitive impairment). However, controlled studies have not found CBD to reliably buffer these psychoactive effects. One driving-simulator trial noted that adding CBD to vaporized cannabis did not prevent THC-induced impairment of driving or cognitionjamanetwork.com. In other words, individuals were just as impaired on a THC/CBD mix as they were on THC alone. CBD does, nevertheless, have distinct therapeutic actions (e.g. anticonvulsant, anxiolytic) and a much lower side-effect profile than THC (CBD causes no intoxication or heart-rate increase, for instance). Clinically, this means formulations are chosen thoughtfully: a balanced THC:CBD product may somewhat reduce THC-related anxiety or sedation for some patients, but CBD is not a cure-all for THC’s effects. Patients should still use caution with activities like driving, even if using high-CBD strains. Overall, THC primarily drives the psychoactive and analgesic impact by directly activating cannabinoid receptors, while CBD’s role is modulatory – interacting with receptors like TRPV1 and 5-HT, and indirectly affecting the endocannabinoid system. The two cannabinoids can complement each other for certain conditions (such as combining for neuropathic pain or spasticity treatment), but their interaction is not simply one of CBD “cancelling” THC; instead, it involves nuanced receptor and metabolic effects that researchers continue to study.
Q5: Is cannabis effective for chronic pain management?
A5: Evidence suggests that cannabis and cannabinoids can alleviate certain types of chronic pain, especially neuropathic pain, though they may be modest in effect and accompanied by side effects. Early systematic reviews found cannabinoids to be about as effective as codeine in controlling pain – for example, a 2001 BMJ review of trials concluded oral THC (5–20 mg) provided analgesia on par with 50–120 mg of codeinepubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. However, that review noted frequent psychotropic side effects and cautioned that cannabinoids offered no clear advantage over traditional analgesicspubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. More recent randomized trials have demonstrated pain reductions in specific contexts. In 2007, Abrams et al. showed that smoked cannabis (3.56% THC) significantly reduced HIV-associated neuropathy pain: median pain scores fell 34% with cannabis vs 17% with placebo over 5 days (p=0.03)pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Over half of the cannabis group achieved a ≥30% pain reduction, double the response rate of placebopubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Cannabis also reduced the painful nerve sensitivity (allodynia/hyperalgesia) in that studypubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
Similarly, a Canadian trial (Ware et al. 2010) tested smoked cannabis in chronic post-injury neuropathic pain. A single inhalation of 25 mg of 9.4% THC herbal cannabis three times daily led to a modest pain intensity drop (0.7 points on 0–10 scale vs placebo, p=0.02) and significantly improved sleep quality over a five-day periodpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Lower THC potencies (6% and 2.5%) produced intermediate, non-significant pain relief in that study, indicating a dose-response effectpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Patients generally tolerated these low doses well; side effects included mild sedation, dry eyes, dizziness, and coughpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
Overall, clinical trials and patient-reported outcomes support that cannabis can help patients with chronic neuropathic pain (e.g. from diabetes, spinal injury, or HIV) who don’t get relief from standard therapies. It often improves subjective sleep and quality of life as wellpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. On the other hand, for acute pain or generalized chronic pain, cannabinoids have shown less benefit. Importantly, side effects like cognitive impairment, dizziness, and dry mouth are common, and long-term safety data are still accruing. Thus, medical guidelines typically reserve cannabis as an adjunct or second-line analgesic for patients with refractory pain conditions. When used, careful titration is advised – starting at low doses of THC to minimize psychoactive effects while achieving pain relief. Combining THC with CBD (as in certain oromucosal sprays) is another strategy to possibly broaden analgesic effects and reduce THC’s intoxicating dose, though high-quality data on synergy in pain are mixed. In summary, cannabis is not a first-line analgesic for most routine pain management, but it can be a valuable option for neuropathic pain or cancer-related pain in patients who do not respond to or cannot tolerate opioids and other medicationspubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
Q6: Can cannabis-based medicines help in multiple sclerosis symptoms?
A6: Yes – cannabis-based medicines are used to manage certain debilitating symptoms of multiple sclerosis (MS), particularly muscle spasticity and neuropathic pain. MS patients often suffer from spasticity (involuntary muscle contractions causing stiffness and pain) that is not fully relieved by standard antispasticity drugs. Clinical trials have found that cannabinoids can provide additional relief in this setting. Notably, an oromucosal spray combining THC and CBD (nabiximols) has been tested in MS spasticity with positive results. In a 2011 European trial of patients with refractory spasticity, nabiximols was added to ongoing therapy in a specialized “enriched” design: after a 4-week open trial, only responders were randomized to continue nabiximols vs. placebo. In the 12-week double-blind phase, spasticity severity (on a 0–10 numeric rating) improved significantly more with nabiximols than placebo (p=0.0002)pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Secondary outcomes – like the proportion of patients with clinically meaningful spasticity reduction, frequency of muscle spasms, sleep disturbance, and global impression of change – were also significantly better on nabiximolspubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. These findings confirm earlier placebo-controlled studies and subsequent meta-analyses showing that nabiximols provides an additive benefit for moderate-to-severe MS spasticity that is unresponsive to usual carepubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
In practice, approximately 40–60% of such patients may experience a clinically significant reduction in spasticity severity with cannabinoid therapy. Patients often report improved mobility and sleep when spasticity is eased. Beyond spasticity, small trials indicate cannabinoids can help neuropathic pain in MS and perhaps bladder overactivity, although evidence is less robust there. MS patients also sometimes report subjective improvements in tremor or insomnia with cannabis, but objective data are limited. It’s important that these therapies are used under medical supervision: in many countries (UK, much of EU), nabiximols is a prescription medicine for MS, initiated by a specialist. Dosing is gradually uptitrated to balance relief with side effects (which can include dizziness or fatigue). Where nabiximols is unavailable, some MS patients legally access cannabis flower or oils under medical programs, and anecdotally many find symptom relief – though dosing is less standardized in those cases. Overall, cannabis-based medicines are now an accepted adjunct treatment for MS spasticity in numerous countries, reflected in regulatory approvals and guidelinespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. They offer a therapeutic avenue when conventional drugs like baclofen or tizanidine fail to fully control MS-related muscle tone and pain.
Q7: Can cannabidiol (CBD) reduce seizures in epilepsy?
A7: Yes. High-dose pharmaceutical CBD has been shown to reduce seizures in certain forms of drug-resistant epilepsy, marking one of the clearest successes of cannabinoid-based medicine. The strongest evidence comes from rare childhood epilepsy syndromes such as Dravet syndrome and Lennox–Gastaut syndrome (LGS). In a landmark 2017 clinical trial in Dravet syndrome (a severe genetic epilepsy beginning in infancy), Devinsky et al. found that adding CBD oral solution (20 mg/kg/day) significantly reduced convulsive seizures compared to placebopubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Over the 14-week treatment period, median monthly seizure frequency dropped from 12.4 to 5.9 with CBD, versus a minimal change (14.9 to 14.1) on placebopubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. This was a nearly 39% median reduction in convulsive seizures, and the difference between groups was statistically significant (adjusted –22.8 percentage points vs placebo in seizure frequency, p = 0.01)pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Furthermore, 43% of patients on CBD achieved at least a 50% reduction in seizures (versus 27% on placebo), and a few (5%) became completely seizure-free during the trial (none on placebo did, though that difference wasn’t statistically significant)pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Beyond seizure counts, caregivers reported overall improvements: 62% on CBD vs 34% on placebo had a notable improvement in global conditionpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
Similar results were seen in trials for Lennox–Gastaut syndrome, leading to regulatory approvals. These studies collectively led to the first FDA-approved plant-derived cannabinoid medication, Epidiolex (purified CBD), for refractory epilepsy. It’s important to note that while CBD can markedly reduce seizures in these severe syndromes, it is not a cure – most patients still have some seizures, and a subset may not respond. Additionally, CBD’s use at high doses can cause side effects such as drowsiness, diarrhea, and elevated liver enzymespubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. In the Dravet trial, adverse events (like somnolence and gastrointestinal upset) were more frequent with CBD, and a minority of patients had to discontinue due to side effectspubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Unlike THC, CBD does not produce euphoria or cognitive impairment, which is advantageous for treating children.
For typical forms of epilepsy, evidence is still emerging. Currently, CBD is primarily indicated for specific severe epilepsies, and patients are generally managed by neurologists who monitor blood levels and potential drug interactions (CBD can interact with other anticonvulsants). Nonetheless, this research provides proof that a cannabinoid can be harnessed as an effective anti-seizure medication. The success in epilepsy has in turn spurred interest in CBD for other neurological disorders. Importantly, patients should not replace established epilepsy treatments with over-the-counter CBD products on their own; the clinical trials used a pharmaceutical-grade formulation at controlled dosages. But under medical guidance, CBD has opened a new therapeutic option for intractable seizures – improving quality of life for many children and families where few alternatives existedpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
Q8: Do high-potency cannabis concentrates pose greater risks than standard cannabis?
A8: High-potency cannabis concentrates (such as butane hash oil, wax, or other extracts often 60–90% THC) deliver substantially more THC per unit volume than dried cannabis flower. Intuitively, one might expect these products to cause greater impairment and risk. Surprisingly, research suggests that experienced users self-titrate their intake to some extent, partially offsetting the higher potency. A 2020 study compared regular cannabis flower users to concentrate users in a legal-market setting. It found that concentrate users did reach markedly higher THC blood levels – about 0.32 µg/mL (320 ng/mL) THC in plasma after ad libitum use, versus 0.14 µg/mL (140 ng/mL) in flower users – measured shortly after a typical use sessionjamanetwork.com. The concentrate group’s THC and active metabolite (11-OH-THC) levels were roughly double those of the flower group across all time pointsjamanetwork.com. Despite this, the two groups showed comparable levels of acute intoxication and impairment on most neurocognitive tests. In that study, short-term memory recall and balance (standing stability) were impaired after cannabis use in both groups, but there were no significant differences in impairment between those who used 16–24% THC flower and those who used 70–90% THC concentratesjamanetwork.comjamanetwork.com. In other words, the concentrate users didn’t get exponentially “more high” or more cognitively impaired than the flower users, likely because they consumed smaller quantities or paced their use (titration) based on subjective effectjamanetwork.com.
However, higher potency still carries risks. The concentrate users in the study were extremely tolerant, long-term consumers; they may need high blood THC to achieve the same effect, which itself raises concerns about dependency. The very high THC exposures (levels up to or beyond 300 ng/mL, far above levels seen with typical doses of smoked flower) could have unrecognized health impacts, and may prolong the duration of impairment. Notably, even though acute effects plateaued due to titration, total THC exposure was greater in concentrate usersjamanetwork.com – which could heighten longer-term risks like cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome or psychiatric effects in susceptible individuals. Additionally, concentrates can deliver THC extremely quickly, and novice users are at high risk of over-intoxication (e.g. anxiety, psychomotor impairment) because a small dab can equal several joints’ worth of THC.
From a public health standpoint, the emergence of ultra-high-THC products is concerning. They require careful education: users should be counseled to start with tiny amounts and wait adequate time to gauge effects. Regulatory approaches in some jurisdictions include potency limits or extra taxes on high-THC products. In summary, while experienced users may not appear more cognitively impaired by concentrates than by lower-potency cannabis (thanks to self-regulation of dose)jamanetwork.comjamanetwork.com, the physiologic THC burden is much greater. This underscores that concentrates amplify the importance of user caution and regulatory oversight to prevent adverse outcomes.
Q9: How do patients access medical cannabis in the United States, and what conditions qualify?
A9: In the United States, medical cannabis access is governed by a patchwork of state laws. As of 2025, the majority of states (around 38–40 states plus D.C.) have legalized cannabis for medical use, but the federal government still classifies cannabis as a Schedule I controlled substance (illegal under federal law). This means there is no single nationwide program – each state sets its own rules on qualifying conditions, patient registration, and dispensing. Typically, a patient must obtain a recommendation from a licensed physician certifying that they have a condition that could benefit from cannabis. States maintain lists of qualifying medical conditions which commonly include: chronic or severe pain, cancer (for pain or chemotherapy-induced nausea), HIV/AIDS (for appetite loss and wasting), persistent muscle spasticity (e.g. in MS or spinal cord injury), intractable epilepsy, severe nausea, and often post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Some states have broader criteria (e.g. any condition that a doctor deems appropriate, or “chronic pain” as a broad category), whereas others enumerate specific diagnoses like glaucoma, Crohn’s disease, or autism. For example, many early-adopting states focused on cancer, HIV, MS, and epilepsy, but over time chronic non-cancer pain has become the most frequent reason patients enroll in medical cannabis programs in the U.S.labiotech.eu.
To become a legal medical cannabis patient, one typically must register with the state program and obtain a medical marijuana ID card. Once approved, patients (or their designated caregivers) can purchase cannabis from state-licensed dispensaries. These dispensaries are specialized retail outlets that sell cannabis products (dried flower, oils, edibles, topical creams, etc.) under state regulation. Product testing for potency and contaminants is generally required by state law. There are purchase limits (for instance, a few ounces of flower or its equivalent per month) and often a requirement for periodic renewal of the doctor’s recommendation (e.g. annually). It’s worth noting that while many states allow home cultivation of a limited number of plants by patients, others do not. The cost of cannabis is usually out-of-pocket, as insurance (public or private) doesn’t cover a federally illegal substance.
Because of federal illegality, access can vary widely: some states have robust programs with tens or hundreds of thousands of patients and dispensaries in every major city, whereas a few states have extremely narrow programs (for example, low-THC CBD oil only, or requiring a very short list of conditions). Travelling with medical cannabis is legally problematic – crossing state lines remains federally unlawful, even between two legal states. In summary, a patient in the U.S. must navigate state-specific systems: find a certifying doctor (some states require this doctor to take a special course or be registered with the program), apply to the state, and then purchase from licensed outlets. The conditions most often qualifying – severe chronic illnesses causing symptoms like pain, spasticity, nausea, seizures – align with those where conventional treatments may fail and where emerging evidence (and advocacy) has supported cannabis’s therapeutic potentiallabiotech.eulabiotech.eu. Patients and providers must also remain aware that federal law prohibits cannabis use, which creates ongoing tension (for example, VA physicians cannot fill out state forms for veterans, and employment drug testing can still pose issues for patients).
Q10: What is Germany’s approach to medical and recreational cannabis regulation?
A10: Germany legalized medical cannabis in March 2017 and has since built one of Europe’s model programs, while also moving (incrementally) toward recreational legalization. Under the 2017 law, any licensed physician can prescribe medical cannabis for patients with serious conditions – such as chronic pain, multiple sclerosis, cachexia, or other severe illnesses – when standard therapies have failedlabiotech.eulabiotech.eu. Uniquely, Germany did not restrict cannabis to an explicit list of qualifying conditions; instead, the law allows doctor discretion for “any severe disease” if the potential benefit is justifiable and no alternative treatment is availablelabiotech.eupracticeguides.chambers.com. Patients obtain cannabis by prescription at pharmacies. Unlike in the U.S., medical cannabis in Germany is treated closer to a medicine: it is dispensed in pharmacies (as dried flower or extracts) and regulated by the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM). Germany also integrated medical cannabis into its healthcare system – public health insurers can reimburse the cost for approved indications, upon pre-authorization, as outlined in the Social Security Codepracticeguides.chambers.compracticeguides.chambers.com. This has made medical cannabis accessible to tens of thousands of patients (over 128,000 reimbursements were approved in the first three years).
On the supply side, Germany initially relied on imports from countries like the Netherlands and Canada. BfArM established a Cannabis Agency to oversee cultivation domesticallylabiotech.eu. They ran tenders for licensed growers, leading to strictly regulated indoor cultivation within Germanylabiotech.eulabiotech.eu. Quality control is rigorous – cannabis is produced under pharma-grade standards and tested for contaminants and consistent cannabinoid contentlabiotech.eulabiotech.eu. Only certain high-quality varieties are dispensed, and pharmacists often prepare the dispensed form (e.g. grinding flower or making tea sachets) as per German pharmacopeia guidelines.
Regarding education and clinical guidance, German physicians were initially cautious since cannabis wasn’t traditionally in the formulary. The law doesn’t mandate special training for prescribing; any physician (typically not dentists or vets) could prescribe, originally on a narcotic prescription form. As of 2024, with new reforms, cannabis was removed from the narcotics law for medical use, simplifying prescribing (a standard prescription suffices)practiceguides.chambers.compracticeguides.chambers.com. Medical societies in Germany have published prescribing guidelines, and doctors must report outcomes to a registry for the first few years, which helped build evidence.
In 2022, a new coalition government announced plans to legalize adult-use (recreational) cannabis, aiming to reduce illicit market harms. By 2023–2025, Germany charted a phased approach: first, personal possession of up to 25 grams and home growing (3 plants) have been legalized, and “cannabis social clubs” for non-profit collective cultivation are being introduced. Commercial retail sales are expected to be piloted in select regions under strict licensing, with full nationwide recreational markets possibly by 2026–2027 if those pilots succeed. This two-pillar plan (non-profit clubs plus regional commercial trials) was designed to comply with EU law. For recreational use, the legal age will be 18 (likely with THC limits for under-21), advertising will be banned, and education on use risks will be integral.
Thus, Germany’s regulatory landscape is: Medical cannabis is legal and integrated into healthcare (with state-controlled supply and insurance coverage in some cases), and recreational cannabis is undergoing cautious legalization, aiming to create a regulated market by the later 2020s. Notably, Germany’s emphasis on medical product quality and physician oversight has been very high – in line with its pharmaceutical regulatory standards – and this is expected to continue even as recreational policy evolvespracticeguides.chambers.compracticeguides.chambers.com. Germany’s experience may serve as a blueprint in Europe, demonstrating how to transition from a strictly medical cannabis regime to a mixed medical-and-adult-use system while prioritizing public health, youth protection, and product safety.
Q11: How is cannabis being legalized and regulated in Mexico?
A11: Mexico is in the process of overhauling its cannabis laws, with medical use legalized in theory but limited in practice, and full recreational legalization anticipated in the coming years due to court mandates. Medical cannabis in Mexico was officially legalized by a 2017 legal amendment, but implementation remained slow. In January 2021, the Ministry of Health issued regulations (“Rules for Medical Cannabis”) to govern medical usecms.lawcms.law. These rules allow cannabis cultivation, production, and use for medical and scientific purposes only – recreational use is still not formally legislated. Under the medical framework, any medicine containing >1% THC is treated as a controlled substance that must undergo the standard pharmaceutical approval process with the regulatory agency COFEPRIScms.law. This means a company must conduct clinical trials and obtain a formal sanitary registration for a cannabis-based drug, just like any new prescription medicationcms.law. As a result, few cannabis medicines are currently available in Mexico aside from low-THC CBD products (which are allowed if they stay below 1% THC)cms.lawcms.law and one pharmaceutical CBD epilepsy drug. Medical cannabis prescriptions, when they occur, must follow the country’s controlled substance prescription rules (special duplicate forms with barcodes issued by COFEPRIS)natlawreview.comnatlawreview.com. Only qualified health professionals (medical doctors with a current license) can prescribe cannabis-based medications, and they need a specific prescribing permit from COFEPRIS for cannabis drugsnatlawreview.comnatlawreview.com. In practice, this means medical cannabis use in Mexico is still rare and mostly limited to CBD or to patients enrolled in clinical trials, because no broad access system (like dispensaries or routine doctor recommendations) exists yet.
On the recreational side, Mexico’s Supreme Court has ruled multiple times (2015–2018) that the absolute ban on personal cannabis use is unconstitutional, framing it as a human rights issue. In 2021, the Court took the unprecedented step of striking down prohibition for adults, effectively requiring the health regulatory agency to issue permits for personal use. Currently, adults in Mexico can apply for an amparo (court injunction) or permit to legally cultivate and possess cannabis for personal (non-commercial) usecms.lawcms.law. The Court’s rulings allow individuals to grow and consume their own cannabis (up to a “reasonable” amount for personal supply) and possess up to 5 grams in publiccms.law. However, because Congress has yet to pass comprehensive legislation, there is no regulated market or dispensaries. To obtain a permit, an adult must make a formal request to COFEPRIS, be denied (since recreational use is still banned by statute), then go to court to have the ban overturned in their individual case – a burdensome processcms.law. As of 2023, legislation to legalize and regulate cannabis (the Cannabis General Law) has been debated but not finalized. A bill that passed the Lower House in March 2021 envisioned licensed commercial production, sales, and even allowed adults to grow 6–8 plants at homecms.lawcms.law. It included provisions like a 28 g possession limit (up from 5 g currently) and the creation of a regulatory agency under the Ministry of Health (CONADIC) to oversee licenses for cultivation, processing, and retailcms.law. CBD was defined as non-psychoactive and would be permitted in both medical and consumer products under that proposalcms.law. Hemp (cáñamo) with ≤1% THC would be regulated as an agricultural product with permits from the Agriculture Ministrycms.law.
Because Congress missed multiple deadlines set by the Supreme Court to enact a law, full legalization is in a gray zone. In the interim, personal use through the court-permit system is technically allowed but not widely utilized. Commercial activities (selling, importing non-approved products, etc.) remain illegal, meaning there is effectively still no legal way to buy recreational cannabis in Mexico. Enforcement against small-scale possession is reportedly de-prioritized, yet the illicit market continues to operate in absence of licensed shops. Looking forward, Mexico is expected to legalize adult-use properly by 2026 given political pressures and the Court’s stance – which would make it one of the world’s largest legal cannabis markets. When that happens, regulations will need to address licensing of growers and retailers, quality control, public health campaigns, and preventing diversion to minors.
In summary, Mexico’s current cannabis framework is in transition: medical cannabis is technically legal but constrained to regulated pharmaceuticals (no broad dispensary system), and recreational cannabis is not fully legal yet – though personal cultivation/use is permitted via court order, and comprehensive legalization is pending. Patients in Mexico who might benefit from cannabis (e.g. children with epilepsy or adults with chronic illness) largely still rely on either importing products on a case-by-case basis or on the unregulated market until domestic production and approvals expandcms.lawcms.law.
Q12: What medical conditions commonly qualify for cannabis therapy globally?
A12: Across different countries, medical cannabis programs tend to target a similar core set of serious or chronic conditions – typically those where conventional treatments may not provide adequate relief. The most commonly approved or cited qualifying conditions worldwide include:
Chronic Pain: This is the single most common reason for medical cannabis use in North America and Europe. It often encompasses cancer-related pain, neuropathic pain (nerve pain from conditions like diabetes, HIV, or MS), arthritis and back pain, and severe chronic pain of other etiologies. For instance, Germany’s insurance guidelines explicitly mention chronic pain as a qualifying serious condition if standard therapy failspracticeguides.chambers.com, and many U.S. states include “severe or chronic pain” in their criteria.
Cancer (and Cancer Treatment Side Effects): Cannabis is used to manage pain, nausea, vomiting, and appetite loss in cancer or during chemotherapy. Many jurisdictions list “cancer” or “chemotherapy-induced nausea” as qualifying—cannabinoids like dronabinol are officially indicated for nausea in chemotherapy. Patients with cancer may use cannabis to improve appetite (counteracting cachexia) and to alleviate nausea and vomiting when antiemetics are insufficientpracticeguides.chambers.com.
Multiple Sclerosis (MS): MS spasticity and associated pain are well-recognized indications. Countries such as Canada, Germany, and the UK permit nabiximols (THC/CBD spray) for MS. France’s medical cannabis pilot, for example, allowed cannabis for “painful spasticity in multiple sclerosis or other central nervous system diseases”practiceguides.chambers.com.
Neurologic Disorders with Spasticity or Seizures: Beyond MS, spinal cord injury spasticity often qualifies. Refractory epilepsy (especially severe childhood forms like Dravet or LGS) is now an accepted indication in many places due to CBD’s efficacy. Some programs also list Tourette syndrome or severe neuropathic tic disorders, where evidence is limited but emerging. Parkinson’s disease isn’t usually a formal indication, though some patients use it for tremor or dyskinesia (research is ongoing).
HIV/AIDS: Cachexia (wasting syndrome) and anorexia in HIV/AIDS were among the original indications for dronabinol. Many U.S. states include HIV or AIDS as qualifying conditions, to improve appetite and weight, and to alleviate neuropathy or nausea.
Intractable Nausea or Gastrointestinal Illness: Aside from chemo-induced nausea, some programs allow cannabis for chronic nausea (e.g. due to Crohn’s disease) or gastrointestinal disorders like Crohn’s and ulcerative colitis, where patients report symptom relief. A few countries include Crohn’s disease explicitly, acknowledging its difficult-to-treat pain and nausea.
Palliative Care / Terminal Illness: To ensure access for end-of-life care, broad criteria like “any terminal or end-stage illness” are often included. For example, France’s pilot included “palliative situations” as a category for cannabis usepracticeguides.chambers.com. This allows doctors to use cannabis to ease suffering in advanced illnesses (for pain, nausea, anxiety, etc.) regardless of specific diagnosis.
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD): PTSD is recognized in a number of U.S. state programs (e.g. in over 20 states) as veterans and others have advocated for cannabis to manage PTSD-related insomnia and anxiety. It’s less commonly an official indication in Europe, but research is ongoing.
Neuropathic Pain syndromes: Neuropathy from diabetes or other causes, trigeminal neuralgia, and fibromyalgia are sometimes cited. Fibromyalgia specifically isn’t universally listed, but some regions implicitly cover it under chronic pain.
During France’s 2021–2023 pilot, the five indications allowed were: neuropathic pain insufficiently treated by other means, severe epilepsy, chemotherapy-related nausea/vomiting, palliative-care situations, and spasticity in MS or similar conditionspracticeguides.chambers.com. These reflect a consensus of where cannabis’ risk-benefit profile is considered favorablepracticeguides.chambers.compracticeguides.chambers.com. Other countries’ lists are similar, though some are broader (for instance, Australian guidelines allow prescription for any condition if the doctor believes it’s appropriate and standard therapies have been triedharmreductionjournal.biomedcentral.comharmreductionjournal.biomedcentral.com).
It’s worth noting that anxiety, depression, and insomnia – while common reasons people self-medicate with cannabis – are not typically “qualifying conditions” in stricter medical programs due to limited evidence and concern about misuse. However, some jurisdictions do permit cannabis for conditions like anxiety or autism on a case-by-case basis or if severe.
In summary, around the world the prototypical medical cannabis patient is someone suffering significant chronic symptoms (pain, spasticity, nausea, seizures, etc.) from an incurable or debilitating illness, where conventional medications haven’t provided adequate relief. Regulators have focused on these areas both because of evidence of efficacy and high patient need.
Q13: What training do healthcare professionals receive for medical cannabis use?
A13: Training and education for healthcare professionals on medical cannabis vary greatly by country and region – there is not yet a universally standardized curriculum, but several jurisdictions have implemented initiatives to ensure clinicians are prepared. In general, most medical schools historically provided little or no teaching on cannabinoid medicine, so current practitioners often have to seek continuing education on this topic.
Mandatory Training in Some Programs: A few countries have required formal training as a condition of physician participation. For example, in France’s medical cannabis pilot (2021–2024), all prescribers had to complete a mandatory online training module provided by the National Medicines Agency (ANSM) before they could prescribe cannabis to patientspracticeguides.chambers.com. This e-learning covered pharmacology, indications, dosing, and monitoring. Similarly, Italy required physicians to take a government-approved course to prescribe cannabinoids when it first allowed them, and Thailand since 2019 has undertaken a massive training program certifying thousands of doctors and even traditional medicine practitioners in cannabis prescribing. By one year after Thailand’s legalization, over 11,000 healthcare providers were trained and certified to Ministry of Health standards to prescribe or dispense medicinal cannabis in clinics (a remarkable scale)masp.org.my.
Special Certification in Some US States: In the United States, where medical cannabis is state-regulated, some states require physicians to register and in some cases complete a short course. For instance, New York mandates a 2–4 hour online training on medical use of marijuana for doctors to become certifiers. Pennsylvania and Massachusetts have required physicians to review educational material or CME modules about indications, dosing, and risks before issuing certifications. However, many states have no mandatory training – any MD/DO in good standing can recommend cannabis, though state health departments often provide voluntary guidance.
Guidelines and CME: Medical professional bodies have begun issuing clinical guidelines to educate providers. Canada’s initial program (early 2000s) saw Health Canada publish detailed clinician information. Germany’s experience involved medical societies (like the German Pain Society) producing guidelines on when to consider cannabis and how to prescribe and monitor it. Australian health authorities (TGA) have published extensive guidance documents on prescribing medicinal cannabis, and the Royal College of GPs offers training modules emphasizing it as not first-line therapyadf.org.auharmreductionjournal.biomedcentral.com. In the UK, where only a handful of specialists prescribe cannabis, professional colleges have released prescribing guidance and there are now courses (like expert-led webinars) to build competency.
Continuing Medical Education (CME) Courses: With growing demand, numerous CME courses and certificate programs in cannabinoid medicine are now available. For example, The Society of Cannabis Clinicians and other international groups offer courses on the endocannabinoid system, clinical applications, and legal aspects. Universities in some countries have started including cannabis in pharmacy and medical curricula, albeit briefly.
No Formal Requirement (Learn on the Job): In many places, there is actually no official requirement for physician training, which has been a point of concern. Germany, for instance, did not impose any exam or course requirement – it trusted physicians’ clinical judgment within the regulatory framework. Similarly, in Australia, there is no mandatory credentialing or training to prescribe under the Special Access Scheme; any doctor can prescribe if they obtain TGA approval, although the government and hospitals have provided educational materialsharmreductionjournal.biomedcentral.comharmreductionjournal.biomedcentral.com. Surveys find many clinicians still feel ill-equipped: a common refrain is that more research and education are needed for doctors to feel comfortable prescribing cannabis in mainstream practiceharmreductionjournal.biomedcentral.com.
Pharmacist Training: Training isn’t just for doctors. Pharmacists who dispense medical cannabis in places like Germany or Canada have guidelines on handling and counseling patients. Some regions (Thailand, as an example) implemented training programs specifically for pharmacists on cannabis regulations and dosingthailandthc.com.
In summary, while there is a movement toward better education – with some jurisdictions requiring physician training (France’s mandatory coursepracticeguides.chambers.com is a prime example) – many healthcare providers are still catching up via voluntary CME. The trend is toward integrating basic knowledge of the endocannabinoid system and cannabinoid therapeutics into medical education. As legalization expands, countries are likely to mandate at least a brief training for participating clinicians to ensure safe and evidence-based use of medical cannabis. Until then, clinicians often rely on self-education, specialist consultation, and emerging clinical guidelines to inform their practice.
Q14: Does cannabis use impair driving ability and public safety?
A14: Cannabis can impair driving performance, and users are advised not to drive during intoxication – similar to alcohol, though the nature and duration of impairment differ. THC’s psychoactive effects (e.g. slowed reaction time, altered perception, and reduced motor co-ordination) can negatively impact the skills required for safe driving. Epidemiological studies have shown an elevated risk of motor vehicle accidents when drivers are under the influence of cannabis. Controlled trials in driving simulators or on-road tests consistently find that THC intoxication causes dose-dependent impairment, notably increased lane weaving (poor lane position control), slower driving speeds (often a conscious compensation), and delayed reaction to sudden eventsjamanetwork.comjamanetwork.com. Unlike alcohol, cannabis tends not to increase risk-taking – in fact, stoned drivers often recognize their impairment and drive more cautiously (slower, with larger following distances) – but this doesn’t fully counteract the impairment of judgment and reaction.
A recent study in older adults (age 65–79, a growing demographic of cannabis users) illustrated these effects. Even regular users experienced significant driving impairment shortly after consuming their preferred cannabis. At 30 minutes after smoking a high-THC (~19%) cannabis, older drivers showed increased standard deviation of lateral position (i.e. more weaving within the lane) and reduced speed, compared to a sober baselinejamanetwork.com. Notably, these effects had largely subsided by 3 hours after use for objective measures, but participants’ self-rated driving ability remained low for at least 3 hours and many would not choose to drive for up to 5 hours post-usejamanetwork.comjamanetwork.com. This indicates that users felt impaired even after some objective recovery, underscoring a cautious time window. Interestingly, the blood THC levels in that study did not correlate neatly with driving impairment severityjamanetwork.com. Some individuals had low blood THC yet were quite impaired, and vice versa – reflecting that blood THC is an imprecise marker of functional impairment (partly because THC levels decline rapidly within an hour while impairment can persist longer).
In terms of duration: most driving experts recommend refraining from driving for at least 4–6 hours after smoking a moderate dose of cannabis (longer if a higher dose or if eaten, since edibles can cause prolonged effects). In the study above, by 3 hours after smoking, older adults’ performance was closer to baseline on many measuresjamanetwork.comjamanetwork.com, but caution is warranted because individual metabolism and tolerance vary. Chronic heavy users may drive with some THC in their system but less acute impairment due to tolerance – however, they can still be impaired, especially with higher-than-usual doses or in complex driving situations.
Legally, many jurisdictions have established per se blood THC limits for drivers (commonly 2–5 ng/mL in blood in places like Colorado or Europe), but these are controversial since impairment isn’t strictly correlated to a specific THC concentrationjamanetwork.com. From a public health perspective, educating cannabis users is crucial: they need to know that cannabis (even if it makes them feel relaxed) does degrade driving ability – particularly tasks requiring quick reflexes or sustained attention (e.g. responding to an animal running across the road or maintaining concentration on a long, monotonous drive). Combining alcohol and cannabis dramatically increases crash risk beyond either alone, so avoidance of polydrug use before driving is critical.
In summary, cannabis impairs driving in acute use. Users – including medical patients – are advised to wait a sufficient period after use before driving (several hours, and longer if any subjective effects persist). Law enforcement is training in sobriety testing specifically for cannabis, and devices to detect recent use (saliva tests, etc.) are being implemented in some regions. Public safety campaigns now include cannabis-specific messages (e.g. “Drive High, Get a DUI” in parts of the U.S.) to raise awareness that a “stoned driver” is an unsafe driver. As legalization expands, addressing cannabis-impaired driving through education, clear laws, and perhaps technological aids (like performance-based roadside tests) remains a top public health priorityjamanetwork.comjamanetwork.com.
Here’s a consolidated reference list (in order) with full titles and URLs written out:
Arkell, T.R. et al. (2023). “Medical Cannabis and Health-Related Quality of Life and Health Conditions Among Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.” JAMA Network Open.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2804653
PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37159196/
van de Donk, T. et al. (2019). “An experimental randomized study on the analgesic effects of pharmaceutical-grade cannabis in chronic pain patients with fibromyalgia.” PAIN.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30585986/
PDF: https://bedrocan.com/wp-content/uploads/2019_an-experimental-randomized-study-on-the-analgesic_van-de-donk.pdf
Abrams, D.I. et al. (2007). “Cannabis in painful HIV-associated sensory neuropathy: A randomized placebo-controlled trial.” Neurology.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17296917/
PDF: https://www.cmcr.ucsd.edu/images/PDFs/Abrams_2007.pdf
Tramèr, M.R. et al. (2001). “Cannabinoids for control of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting: quantitative systematic review.” BMJ.
https://www.bmj.com/content/323/7303/16
PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11440936/
Ware, M.A. et al. (2010). “Smoked cannabis for chronic neuropathic pain: a randomized controlled trial.” CMAJ.
https://www.cmaj.ca/content/182/14/E694
PDF: https://www.cmaj.ca/content/cmaj/182/14/E694.full.pdf
Wilsey, B. et al. (2013). “Low-dose vaporized cannabis significantly improves neuropathic pain.” Neuropsychopharmacology.
https://www.nature.com/articles/npp201311
Wilsey, B. et al. (2008). “A randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of cannabis cigarettes in neuropathic pain.” The Journal of Pain.
https://www.jpain.org/article/S1526-5900(07)00873-9/fulltext
Bidwell, L.C. et al. (2021). “A naturalistic examination of the acute effects of cannabis on plasma cannabinoids and subjective drug effects.” (Pharmacokinetic/route comparison). [Open-access on PMC]
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12238766/
PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34708254/
Novotna, A. et al. (2011). “A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, enriched-design study of nabiximols (Sativex®) as add-on therapy in patients with refractory spasticity caused by multiple sclerosis.” European Journal of Neurology.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21486763/
Devinsky, O. et al. (2017). “Trial of Cannabidiol for Drug-Resistant Seizures in the Dravet Syndrome.” New England Journal of Medicine.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1611618
PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28538134/
Turna, J. et al. (2022). “Cannabis Use and Health-Related Outcomes After Legalization of Nonmedical Cannabis in Canada.” JAMA Network Open.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2789703
Mental Health
Prevalence: 52.5 million Americans (19%) used cannabis at least once in 2021
Medical Use Growth: 38 states plus DC have legalized medical cannabis
Key Principle: Medical cannabis is not first-line treatment for any psychiatric diagnosis
NAMI's Role: Supporting evidence-based mental health care
Review current research on cannabis and mental health (2020-2025)
Examine benefits, risks, and therapeutic considerations
Provide clinical guidance for mental health professionals
Present US-specific data and statistics
Limited high-quality RCTs for psychiatric conditions
Most evidence from observational studies and case reports
Significant variability in cannabis products and dosing
Need for standardized research protocols
Anxiety: University of Florida 2024 survey found 95.3% of 632 patients experienced anxiety relief
Depression: 2024 study linked cannabis use with increased depressive symptoms and elevated likelihood of developing major depressive disorder
Individual Factors: Youth and those with family history or genetic liability for psychiatric disorders are at higher risk for negative outcomes
Most Common Mental Health Applications: Anxiety (52%), depression (40%), and PTSD/trauma (17%)
Symptom management for treatment-resistant conditions
Reduction in some patients' use of benzodiazepines
Sleep improvement in certain populations
Endocannabinoid system modulation
CBD's potential anti-anxiety properties
THC's effects on mood and perception
Not First-Line: Established treatments (SSRIs, CBT, etc.) remain primary
May be considered as adjunctive therapy in treatment-resistant cases
Requires careful patient selection and monitoring
Psychosis: Cannabis use likely increases risk of developing schizophrenia and other psychoses; higher use increases risk
Cannabis Use Disorder: Approximately 3 in 10 cannabis users develop CUD, with 19.0 million Americans meeting DSM-5-TR criteria in 2022
Depression: Small increased risk of depression and suicidal thoughts among regular users
High-THC Products: Regular use can produce addiction and acute high-dose consumption causes time-limited mental, gastrointestinal, and cardiovascular problems
Modern cannabis products significantly more potent than historical varieties
Increased risk of adverse effects with high-potency products
Youth: Higher risk for negative mental health outcomes
Genetic Predisposition: Family history of psychiatric disorders increases risk
Pre-existing Mental Health Conditions: May worsen symptoms or interfere with treatment
Overall Use: 52.5 million people (19% of Americans) used cannabis in 2021
Medical vs. Recreational: Growing proportion of users citing medical reasons
Frequency: Increasing prevalence of daily or near-daily use
Higher rates of cannabis use among individuals with mood and anxiety disorders
Self-medication patterns common but potentially counterproductive
Treatment Impact: Self-medication with cannabis apparently worsens response to treatment
Emergency department visits related to high-THC use
Challenges in psychiatric treatment settings
Need for integrated substance use and mental health services
Comprehensive substance use history
Screen for cannabis use disorder
Evaluate family history of psychiatric conditions
Consider genetic predisposition factors
Primary Principle: Evidence-based treatments remain first-line
If considering medical cannabis:
Thorough risk-benefit analysis
Start with CBD-predominant products if appropriate
Avoid high-THC products in vulnerable populations
Regular monitoring and reassessment
Honest discussion of limited evidence
Clear communication about risks
Importance of purchasing from regulated sources
Avoiding driving and other safety considerations
High-quality RCTs for specific psychiatric conditions
Long-term safety and efficacy studies
Optimal dosing and delivery methods
Identification of responder characteristics
Need for federal research facilitation
Standardization of medical cannabis products
Integration with existing mental health systems
Protection of vulnerable populations
Development of evidence-based guidelines
Training for mental health professionals
Integration with addiction medicine
Patient monitoring systems
Medical cannabis is not first-line treatment for any psychiatric diagnosis
Limited but emerging evidence for specific conditions
Significant risks, particularly for vulnerable populations
Individual risk-benefit assessment essential
Maintain evidence-based treatment as primary approach
Consider medical cannabis only as adjunctive therapy in select cases
Prioritize patient safety and regular monitoring
Stay current with evolving research
Advocate for high-quality research
Support evidence-based treatment access
Educate families and individuals about risks and benefits
Promote comprehensive, integrated care approaches
American Psychiatric Association guidelines
American Society of Addiction Medicine resources
International Association for the Study of Pain recommendations
PubMed/MEDLINE recent publications
Cochrane systematic reviews
National Academy of Sciences reports
NAMI educational materials
SAMHSA treatment locators
State medical cannabis program information
Sept 1–3: Building a Strong Foundation for Caregivers & Clinics → 3 posts
Sept 4–6: Medical Cannabis Fundamentals & Practice Calculations → 3 posts
Sept 7–9: Safety First: Risks, Side Effects & Monitoring → 3 posts
Sept 10–13: Lower Back Pain & Osteoarthritis → 4 posts
Sept 14–16: Fibromyalgia, Headaches & Neuropathy → 3 posts
Sept 17–19: Mental Health: Anxiety, PTSD & Depression → 3 posts
Sept 20–23: Cancer Patients: Symptom Relief & Risks → 4 posts
Sept 24–26: Seizures & Neurodegenerative Disorders → 3 posts
Sept 27–30: Special Populations (Pediatrics, Geriatrics, Pregnancy, CV/Metabolic) → 4 posts
https://marijuanaaware.com/agenda-speakers/
Travis Quick – Community Educator
Zach Franckhauser – Educator,Ignacio Rodriguez – Community Educator, Orlando‑area eventslinkedin.com
Claucus Alfaro – Physician & Community Engagement Manager,
Jacody Swor – Lead Community Educator, Sarasotalinkedin.com
Aliza Gammon – Educator, senior‑outreach presenter (unverified)
Lisa Conway – Educator, co‑presenter with Welch & Gammon (unverified)
Vincent C. – Educator / Learning and Development
Saige Petzen – Former Lead Community Educator
Sarah Mitchell – Former Community Educator (pre‑Dec 2021)
Renee
Jenifer Perdomo – Late Educator, cancer survivor & advocate
Cassidy Welch – Former Educator, Central/Northeast programs (unverified)
Alex Ford – Former Educator, stress/anxiety webinars (unverified)
Celeste Barnes – Former Educator (limited information)
Randy Ford – Former Educator (limited information)
Inhalation (seconds–minutes):
40-95%
1 g TruClear / Distillate Syringe – 85–94% THC (~850–940 mg THC total)
0.8 g TruPOD Vape Cartridge – 80–90% THC (~640–720 mg THC total)
0.5 g 1:1 Vape Cartridge – ~40–45% CBD + ~40–45% THC (~200–225 mg each)
Live Rosin 1 g – 70–85% cannabinoids, THC primary
15-33%
Cultivar Flower 3.5 g – 24–33%+ THC, 2.5–4%+ terpenes
TruFlower 3.5 g – 18–28% THC, 1–2.5% terpenes
Roll One Flower 3.5 g – 15–22% THC
Ground Flower 7 g – 16–24% THC
Pre‑Rolls 1 g – 15–28% THC
Sublingual / Oral (moderate onset, ~15–45 minutes):
High CBD Tincture 30 mL – 16.7 mg CBD + 0.8 mg THC per mL (500 mg CBD + 25 mg THC total)
1:1 Tincture 15 mL – 16.7 mg CBD + 16.7 mg THC per mL (250 mg each total)
CBN Dream Tincture 15 mL – 10 mg THC + 5 mg CBN per mL (150 mg THC + 75 mg CBN total)
Oral Capsules (slower onset, ~45–120 minutes):
High CBD Capsules 25 ct – 10 mg CBD each, 250 mg total
1:1 Capsules 25 ct – 10 mg CBD + 10 mg THC each, 250 mg each total
CBN Soft Gels 10 ct – 5 mg THC + 5 mg CBN each, 50 mg each total
Edibles (slowest onset, ~1–2 hours):
Standard Edibles (gummies/chocolates) – 10 mg THC per piece, 100 mg total
TruNano Edibles – Nano‑emulsified: faster onset (~30–60 min) than standard edibles
Topical (moderate onset; localized effect, minimal systemic absorption):
Momenta Topical Lotion/Cream – 250 mg THC per container (bottle)
Momenta Topical Gel – 250 mg THC per container (tube/jar)
Also - 1:1 Pain Relief Topical Cream – 100 mg THC + 100 mg CBD per container (lotion pump)
Hybrid Topical Cream – ~250 mg THC (<5 mg CBD), ~2 oz per container
MEDICAL CANNABIS & SLEEP
Effects of a cannabidiol/terpene formulation on sleep in individuals with insomnia (RCT), 2025
Details: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover. N=125 adults with insomnia. Oral CBD 300 mg + terpene blend (linalool, myrcene, limonene, etc.), THC-free.
Results: Marginal ↑ in SWS + REM sleep by 1.3% (SE 0.60; P = .03). Greatest benefit in low baseline SWS/REM (~48 min extra sleep over 4 weeks).
Stats: No effect on total sleep time or HR/HRV; no adverse events.
URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39167421/
Acute Effects of Oral Cannabinoids on Sleep and High-Density EEG (Pilot RCT), 2025
Details: n=20 insomnia patients, oral 10 mg THC + 200 mg CBD. Polysomnography + high-density EEG.
Results: ↓ total sleep time by 24.5 min (p = .05), ↓ REM by 33.9 min (p < .001), ↑ REM latency by 65.6 min (p = .008). EEG: ↓ gamma (N2), ↓ delta (N3), ↑ beta/alpha (REM).
Stats: No next-day driving/cognitive impairment; slight ↑ self-reported sleepiness (+0.42, p = .02).
URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40631525/
Effectiveness of a Cannabinoid-Based Supplement on Sleep and Health-Related QoL (RCT), 2025
Details: Randomized, placebo-controlled trial (ISRCTN 15022302). Daily cannabinoid supplement vs placebo.
Results: Significant improvements in sleep quality, sleep efficiency, and quality of life.
Stats: Anxiety/mood improved nonsignificantly; no adverse events reported.
URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39980821/
Pilot trial of 150 mg CBD nightly for primary insomnia (RCT), 2024
Details: Randomized, placebo-controlled, 2-week trial (n=30). Sublingual CBD isolate 150 mg.
Results: ↑ sleep efficiency and well-being; no significant effect on total sleep time or latency.
Stats: Efficiency ↑ 6% vs placebo; safe and well tolerated.
URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38174873/
Medicinal cannabis improves sleep in adults with insomnia (RCT), 2023
Details: Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover. n=29 adults with chronic insomnia. Oil: THC (10 mg/mL) + CBD (15 mg/mL).
Results: ↑ total sleep time (+21 min), ↑ efficiency, ↓ insomnia severity.
Stats: Actigraphy confirmed objective improvements; no safety concerns.
URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36539991/
Medical cannabis and cannabinoids for impaired sleep (Systematic Review), 2022
Details: 39 RCTs (≈5,100 participants). Chronic pain and insomnia populations.
Results: Small-to-moderate improvements in sleep quality from cannabinoids.
Stats: Dizziness risk ↑ (RR 1.7), somnolence ↑ (RR 2.1).
URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34546363/
Treating insomnia symptoms with medicinal cannabis (RCT), 2021
Details: Double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover. n=24. Nightly ZTL-101 extract (THC, CBD, CBN).
Results: ↓ Insomnia Severity Index (−5 points), ↑ total sleep time (~30 min), ↓ sleep onset latency.
Stats: 60% achieved clinically meaningful improvement; no serious adverse events.
URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34115851/
U.S. POINTER (2025, RCT, ~2,000): Multidomain lifestyle coaching (exercise, diet, cognitive/social engagement, risk factor control) improved cognition over 2 years vs self-guided care.
🔗 https://www.alz.org/us-pointer/overview.asp
FINGER (2015, RCT, n=1,260): 2-year multidomain program improved global cognition (exec function +83%, processing speed +150%) in at-risk older adults.
🔗 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4266342/
ACTIVE Trial (10-yr follow-up, n≈2,800): Speed-of-processing training reduced dementia incidence by ~29%; booster sessions amplified effects.
🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27521440/
MIND Diet Trial (2023, RCT, n=604): Calorie-matched MIND vs control diets showed no significant difference in cognition after 3 years.
🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37227483/
Lancet Commission (2024): Up to 45% of dementia cases preventable by addressing 14 modifiable risk factors (hearing, HTN, diabetes, inactivity, smoking, pollution, etc.).
🔗 https://www.thelancet.com/commissions/dementia2024
SPRINT-MIND (JAMA 2019): Intensive BP lowering (<120 mmHg) reduced MCI and dementia risk vs standard (<140).
🔗 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2723257
GLP-1 Receptor Agonists (2024, observational): Diabetes patients on GLP-1RAs had 20–40% lower dementia incidence vs other agents.
🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38268668/
Statins/Metformin (ongoing/preventive): Mixed evidence; PREVENTABLE trial testing atorvastatin in 20,000 older adults for dementia outcomes.
🔗 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04262206
ACHIEVE (Lancet 2023, RCT, n=977): Hearing-aid–based care slowed cognitive decline over 3 years in at-risk older adults.
🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37478882/
Cataract Surgery (2021, cohort >3,000): Associated with ~30% reduced dementia risk; mechanism via sensory restoration.
🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34818106/
EXERT (2022, Phase 3 RCT, MCI, n=300): Aerobic and stretching/toning both preserved cognition over 18 months in MCI.
🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35969440/
OSA/CPAP (systematic reviews, 2023): CPAP improved cognition and slowed decline in AD/MCI with sleep apnea; evidence moderate.
🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37290027/
Influenza Vaccination (2020, cohort n=9,000+): Annual flu shots linked to reduced AD risk over ~4 years.
🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32690036/
Shingles Vaccine (2022, cohort n=200,000+): Recombinant zoster vaccination reduced dementia incidence over ~6 years.
🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35880767/
Donanemab (TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2, 2023, Phase 3): Slowed clinical decline in early AD; effect strongest in low–medium tau.
🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37482176/
Lecanemab (CLARITY-AD, 2023): Slowed progression in early AD; requires APOE4 screening due to ARIA risks.
🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36449464/
A4 Trial (Solanezumab, 2023): No slowing of decline in amyloid-positive but cognitively normal adults (important null).
🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37085346/
LX1001 (Lexeo, Phase 1/2, 2023): AAV-mediated APOE2 delivery to APOE4/4 AD patients → increased CSF ApoE2, reduced tau biomarkers.
🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37699171/
ApoE4 antisense (preclinical, 2021): Knockdown of ApoE4 reduced tauopathy and neurodegeneration in mice.
🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33622978/
ApoE “structure correctors” (early discovery): Small molecules restoring ApoE4 to ApoE3-like structure reduced toxicity in human neurons.
🔗 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34808358/
Cognitive Systems – Processes like attention, perception, memory, language, cognitive control.
Arousal/Regulatory Systems – Sleep, circadian rhythms, arousal, energy balance, stress regulation.
Positive Valence Systems – Responses to positive motivational situations (e.g., reward, anticipation, habit).
Negative Valence Systems – Responses to aversive or stressful situations (e.g., fear, anxiety, loss).
Social Processes – Perception of self and others, social communication, attachment, and affiliation.
There is limited but suggestive evidence that full-spectrum cannabidiol (CBD) products may be more effective than purified cannabidiol alone for certain indications, particularly refractory epilepsy. A meta-analysis of observational clinical studies found that patients treated with CBD-rich extracts (which contain additional cannabinoids and terpenes) reported a higher rate of subjective improvement in seizure frequency (71%) compared to those treated with purified CBD (46%), with statistical significance. However, when using the standard clinical threshold of a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency, there was no significant difference in responder rates between the two groups (37% for CBD-rich extracts vs. 42% for purified CBD).[1] Notably, patients using CBD-rich extracts required lower average doses and reported fewer adverse effects than those using purified CBD.
Preclinical studies support the concept of an "entourage effect," where terpenes and minor cannabinoids present in full-spectrum extracts may synergistically enhance the therapeutic effects of CBD, particularly in pain and inflammation models.[2-4] For example, the combination of CBD and the terpene beta-caryophyllene demonstrated synergistic analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects in animal and in vitro models.[3-4]
Despite these findings, the clinical evidence remains preliminary, and rigorous randomized controlled trials directly comparing full-spectrum CBD products to purified CBD are lacking. The only FDA-approved CBD product, Epidiolex, is a purified formulation indicated for specific seizure disorders.[5-6] Therefore, while mechanistic and observational data suggest potential advantages of full-spectrum products, definitive clinical superiority has not been established, and further research is needed to clarify these effects.[1-4]
Would you like me to review the latest randomized controlled trials or ongoing clinical studies that directly compare full-spectrum CBD products to purified CBD for specific conditions, such as epilepsy or chronic pain?
1.
Pamplona FA, da Silva LR, Coan AC.
Frontiers in Neurology. 2018;9:759. doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.00759.
2.
Cannabis Sativa Terpenes Are Cannabimimetic and Selectively Enhance Cannabinoid Activity.
LaVigne JE, Hecksel R, Keresztes A, Streicher JM.
Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1):8232. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-87740-8.
3.
Cannabidiol and Beta-Caryophyllene in Combination: A Therapeutic Functional Interaction.
Blanton H, Yin L, Duong J, Benamar K.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022;23(24):15470. doi:10.3390/ijms232415470.
4.
Mazzantini C, El Bourji Z, Parisio C, et al.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland). 2024;17(4):467. doi:10.3390/ph17040467.
5.
FDA Orange Book
6.
A Review of Human Studies Assessing Cannabidiol's (CBD) Therapeutic Actions and Potential.
White CM.
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2019;59(7):923-934. doi:10.1002/jcph.1387.
The types of cancer most likely to respond with apoptosis to treatment with larger amounts of cannabinoids and combinations of supplement phytochemicals, based on preclinical and in vitro evidence, include breast cancer, prostate cancer, colon cancer, glioma, melanoma, and lung cancer. Cannabidiol (CBD) and other cannabinoids have demonstrated selective pro-apoptotic effects in breast (MCF-7, MDA-MB-231), prostate (PC-3), colon (HCT116, HT29), glioma, melanoma, and lung (A549) cancer cell lines, often via caspase-dependent pathways and modulation of signaling cascades such as FAK/MAPK/Akt/NF-κB, TRPV channels, and Bcl-2/caspase-3.[1-7]
Synergistic pro-apoptotic effects have been observed when cannabinoids are combined with phytochemicals such as curcumin and piperine, particularly in colon cancer models, where the combination activates the Hippo YAP signaling pathway and enhances apoptosis beyond single-agent effects.[3] Echinacea purpurea extract also potentiates cannabinoid-induced apoptosis in lung cancer cells via CB2 receptor-mediated, ROS-dependent, caspase activation.[4]
It is important to note that these findings are primarily from preclinical studies; robust clinical trial data are lacking, and no cannabinoid or phytochemical combination is currently recommended as standard cancer therapy. The selective induction of apoptosis appears to be tumor-type and context dependent, with minimal cytotoxicity to non-malignant cells in vitro.[2] Further research is needed to establish clinical efficacy and safety.
Would you like me to summarize the current status and outcomes of clinical trials investigating cannabinoids and phytochemical combinations in cancer patients, particularly focusing on apoptosis and therapeutic efficacy? This could clarify how preclinical findings are translating into real-world clinical practice.
Melo ESA, Asevedo EA, Duarte-Almeida JM, et al.
Plants (Basel, Switzerland). 2025;14(4):585. doi:10.3390/plants14040585.
New Research
Śledziński P, Nowak-Terpiłowska A, Rzymski P, Słomski R, Zeyland J.
Molecules (Basel, Switzerland). 2023;28(23):7887. doi:10.3390/molecules28237887.
Yüksel B, Hızlı Deniz AA, Şahin F, Sahin K, Türkel N.
Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2023;14:1145666. doi:10.3389/fphar.2023.1145666.
Hosami F, Manayi A, Salimi V, et al.
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies. 2021;21(1):37. doi:10.1186/s12906-021-03204-6.
Guindon J, Hohmann AG.
British Journal of Pharmacology. 2011;163(7):1447-63. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01327.x.
Leading Journal
Suttithumsatid W, Sukketsiri W, Panichayupakaranant P.
Toxicology in Vitro : An International Journal Published in Association With BIBRA. 2023;93:105667. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2023.105667.
Bachari A, Piva TJ, Salami SA, Jamshidi N, Mantri N.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21(17):E6040. doi:10.3390/ijms21176040.
There are currently no completed, high-quality clinical trials demonstrating that cannabinoids or combinations of cannabinoids with supplement phytochemicals induce apoptosis or improve therapeutic efficacy in cancer patients. The available evidence for pro-apoptotic and antitumor effects of cannabinoids (such as CBD and THC) and combinations with phytochemicals (e.g., curcumin, piperine, Echinacea purpurea) is almost exclusively preclinical, based on in vitro and animal studies in breast, colon, lung, prostate, and glioma models.[1-9]
A small number of early-phase clinical studies have explored cannabinoids (primarily THC:CBD blends) as adjuncts to standard therapy in glioblastoma, with some promising signals for safety and possible efficacy, but these studies are underpowered and not definitive.[2] No clinical trials have established dosing, safety, or efficacy for combinations of cannabinoids with other supplement phytochemicals in cancer patients.
Cannabinoids are currently used in oncology primarily for symptom management (e.g., nausea, appetite, pain), not as cytotoxic or disease-modifying agents.[10-11] The medical literature emphasizes that while cannabinoids and certain phytochemicals can induce apoptosis in cancer cells in vitro, translation to clinical benefit in humans remains unproven and is not part of any guideline-endorsed cancer therapy.[1-2][5][9-11]
In summary, no cannabinoid or cannabinoid-phytochemical combination is currently supported by clinical trial evidence for inducing apoptosis or improving therapeutic outcomes in cancer patients. Their use should remain investigational until robust clinical data are available.
Would you like me to summarize the ongoing or planned clinical trials registered in major databases (such as ClinicalTrials.gov) that are investigating cannabinoids or cannabinoid-phytochemical combinations for cancer therapy, including their design, endpoints, and expected completion dates? This could help identify where future evidence may emerge.
1.
Cannabinoids as Anticancer Drugs: Current Status of Preclinical Research.
Hinz B, Ramer R.
British Journal of Cancer. 2022;127(1):1-13. doi:10.1038/s41416-022-01727-4.
Leading Journal
2.
Bukowska B.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024;25(23):12738. doi:10.3390/ijms252312738.
New Research
3.
Younes M, Hage ME, Shebaby W, et al.
Scientific Reports. 2024;14(1):25642. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-76340-x.
New Research
4.
Melo ESA, Asevedo EA, Duarte-Almeida JM, et al.
Plants (Basel, Switzerland). 2025;14(4):585. doi:10.3390/plants14040585.
New Research
5.
Lal S, Shekher A, Puneet, et al.
Pharmacological Research. 2021;163:105302. doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105302.
Leading Journal
6.
Yüksel B, Hızlı Deniz AA, Şahin F, Sahin K, Türkel N.
Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2023;14:1145666. doi:10.3389/fphar.2023.1145666.
7.
Hosami F, Manayi A, Salimi V, et al.
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies. 2021;21(1):37. doi:10.1186/s12906-021-03204-6.
8.
Śledziński P, Nowak-Terpiłowska A, Rzymski P, Słomski R, Zeyland J.
Molecules (Basel, Switzerland). 2023;28(23):7887. doi:10.3390/molecules28237887.
9.
Cancer Initiation, Progression and Resistance: Are Phytocannabinoids From L. Promising Compounds?.
Nigro E, Formato M, Crescente G, Daniele A.
Molecules (Basel, Switzerland). 2021;26(9):2668. doi:10.3390/molecules26092668.
10.
Medical Marijuana Use in Oncology: A Review.
Wilkie G, Sakr B, Rizack T.
JAMA Oncology. 2016;2(5):670-675. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0155.
Leading Journal
11.
Anti-Cancer Potential of Cannabinoids, Terpenes, and Flavonoids Present in Cannabis.
Tomko AM, Whynot EG, Ellis LD, Dupré DJ.
Cancers. 2020;12(7):E1985. doi:10.3390/cancers12071985.
M4MM
SCC POT Trulieve OMMU, Ga medical cannabis or your state rules/reg, FMCCE, CannabisLab, NORML, https://www.safeaccessnow.org/#gsc.tab=0
Good afternoon. I want to begin by sincerely thanking the Blue Ribbon Committee for your leadership in guiding Georgia’s medical cannabis program. Your oversight ensures that access, safety, and compassion remain central to this important work.
I also want to recognize that September is both Pain Awareness Month and Suicide Prevention Month. More than 50 million Americans live with chronic pain, and in Georgia alone, thousands of patients struggle daily with pain that is inadequately controlled. Untreated pain doesn’t just limit mobility — it contributes to depression, disability, and even suicide risk. Expanding access to safe, physician-guided medical cannabis is not just a policy adjustment — it’s a compassionate and evidence-based lifeline.
Before I continue, I’d like to acknowledge two of my colleagues who represent the heart of our Georgia operations. Clinical Director Shoshanna Robinson, an experienced clinical pharmacist at Emory, brings deep expertise in patient safety, therapeutic management, and evidence-based care. And Bryce, our Lead Community Educator for Georgia, ensures patients and families are informed, supported, and empowered with accurate information about medical cannabis options. Their dedication reflects what makes Trulieve a trusted partner in this state.
As for myself — I am Dr. Terel Newton, a board-certified anesthesiologist and interventional pain specialist, Medical Director for Trulieve Florida, and author of Endocannabinoid Medicine and Pharmacology, which became a #1 bestseller in Pain Medicine. I’ve presented at more than fifty conferences, and my career has focused on integrating medical cannabis into pain management, reducing reliance on opioids, and advancing health equity.
Let me take a moment to highlight where we stand today with Georgia’s medical cannabis program. The Georgia Hope Act of 2019 authorized a regulated system for cultivation, production, and dispensing of low-THC oil, overseen by the Georgia Access to Medical Cannabis Commission. Trulieve was honored to open Georgia’s very first dispensary in April 2023 right here in Macon. Today, the program has registered more than 33,160 patients and engaged 748 physicians statewide. But the program’s continued success depends on outreach and education. Studies show that when patients are educated about different cannabis formulations, adherence and symptom control improve significantly. That’s why education and patient registration must remain a top priority
GA Health Commission Presentati…
.
Now, let’s consider what’s needed to strengthen and expand access.
First, Georgia law currently requires conditions like cancer, ALS, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, and AIDS to be “severe or end stage” before patients qualify. Yet evidence shows benefits much earlier. For example, in moderate multiple sclerosis, Nabiximols reduced spasticity by up to 30% and improved sleep. In outpatient Parkinson’s disease, cannabis reduced tremors and dyskinesia, improving daily function. In mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s, low-dose THC reduced agitation and boosted appetite. And in HIV/AIDS, ambulatory patients experienced meaningful reductions in neuropathic pain. Relief should not be reserved only for the terminal phase. Georgia should remove the “end stage” requirement and empower physicians to certify when symptoms are clinically significant or when standard therapies fail.
Second, Georgia excludes several conditions that have strong or emerging evidence: fibromyalgia, ulcerative colitis, insomnia, opioid use disorder, and anxiety. In fibromyalgia, randomized data show cannabis lowered symptom burden by 44%. In inflammatory bowel disease, cannabis reduced CDAI scores by over 100 points, with nearly half of patients achieving remission. In insomnia, THC/CBD sprays shortened sleep latency by 30–40 minutes and added more than an hour of nightly rest. States with cannabis laws show 17–31% reductions in opioid prescribing, and observational studies demonstrate significant acute reductions in anxiety symptoms measured by GAD-7. Georgia should expand the condition list or adopt a physician-discretion model, as states like Florida, Vermont, and Minnesota already do.
Third, the 5% THC cap is too restrictive to be therapeutic. Trials of Nabiximols titrated patients to 20–30 mg THC/day, leading to a 25–34% reduction in spasticity. Long-term studies allowed doses as high as 130 mg/day, with tolerable safety. In cancer pain trials, daily THC dosing between 20–40 mg produced clinically significant analgesia. Under current law, Georgia patients would need to consume impractically large volumes of oil to reach these levels, raising costs, discouraging adherence, and pushing some toward illicit sources. The evidence supports raising or removing the cap, with sensible regulation, labeling, and taxation to ensure safe use.
Fourth, Georgia only permits oils, tinctures, capsules, and topicals. Yet patients often need faster relief. Inhalation peaks within 3–10 minutes, compared to 1–3 hours for oral forms, making it essential for breakthrough pain, nausea, or seizures. Data from states that allow inhalation and vaporization show higher patient satisfaction, better adherence, and reductions in the use of rescue medications. Georgia should authorize inhalation and vaporization, and consider pilot authorization for flower and edibles under controlled potency guidelines.
Fifth, Georgia’s closed condition list leaves many patients without options. A compassionate-use or “Right-to-Try” pathway would ensure that patients with debilitating conditions like refractory migraines, fibromyalgia, or severe anxiety aren’t excluded when conventional therapies fail. Pilot RCTs in ulcerative colitis have already shown improvements in both disease activity and quality of life, while real-world data consistently demonstrate reduced migraine intensity and anxiety symptoms with cannabis use. Other states, like New York and Minnesota, have already adopted such models.
Finally, access itself must be modernized. Georgia requires in-person pickup at dispensaries, which disproportionately burdens rural, elderly, and disabled patients. More than 25 U.S. states plus Puerto Rico already allow some form of medical cannabis delivery. Patient surveys in those states show fewer missed doses, reduced travel burden, and improved treatment adherence. Track-and-trace systems and licensed couriers can ensure accountability, while subsidies or reasonable fees make delivery equitable statewide.
In closing, as we observe Pain Awareness and Suicide Prevention Month, we must confront the reality that untreated pain and lack of access can worsen suffering and, in some cases, lead to despair. By modernizing Georgia’s program — removing the end-stage requirement, expanding conditions, adjusting the THC cap, authorizing more forms, creating compassionate-use pathways, and enabling safe delivery — we can deliver evidence-based, equitable, and compassionate care.
This is not about politics. It is about dignity, science, and improving lives. On behalf of Trulieve Georgia, thank you again for your leadership and your partnership in advancing health for patients across our state.”