To establish a standardized framework of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) that embed transformational leadership principles into the operations of a rapidly growing company, fostering a culture of vision, empowerment, innovation, and adaptability to drive sustainable growth.
This SOP applies to all leadership teams, department heads, and employees involved in strategic planning, team management, innovation, communication, and performance evaluation within the company.
Executive Leadership: Develops and communicates the company vision, approves SOPs, and models transformational leadership behaviors.
Department Heads: Implement SOPs within their teams, ensure alignment with company goals, and provide feedback for continuous improvement.
HR Team: Facilitates training and development programs aligned with transformational leadership principles.
Employees: Engage with SOPs, provide input, and participate in leadership-driven initiatives.
SOP Coordinator: Oversees the creation, implementation, and maintenance of these SOPs.
Transformational Leadership: A leadership style that inspires positive changes by motivating employees through a shared vision, intellectual stimulation, individualized consideration, and inspirational motivation.
SOP: Standard Operating Procedure, a documented process to ensure consistency and efficiency.
Rapidly Growing Company: A company experiencing significant growth in revenue, workforce, or market presence, requiring scalable processes.
Purpose: To ensure all teams align their goals and activities with the company’s vision and strategic objectives, fostering a unified direction.
Key Components:
Vision Articulation: Executive Leadership defines and communicates a clear, inspiring company vision (e.g., via town halls, company-wide memos).
Strategy Development: Leadership collaborates with department heads to create measurable strategic objectives (e.g., SMART goals: Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound).
Cascading Goals: Department heads translate company objectives into team-specific goals, reviewed quarterly.
Alignment Checkpoints: Monthly leadership meetings to assess alignment and adjust strategies as needed.
Responsibility: Executive Leadership, Department Heads.
Output: Documented vision statement, strategic plan, and department-level goals.
Purpose: To empower employees through training, autonomy, and growth opportunities, fostering engagement and leadership at all levels.
Key Components:
Training Programs: HR designs leadership development and skill-building programs (e.g., workshops on emotional intelligence, decision-making).
Autonomy Guidelines: Define decision-making boundaries for teams to encourage ownership while maintaining accountability.
Mentorship Framework: Pair employees with mentors to support career growth and transformational leadership behaviors.
Feedback Mechanism: Implement regular one-on-one meetings to provide individualized support and coaching.
Responsibility: HR Team, Department Heads, Mentors.
Output: Training schedules, mentorship assignments, and documented feedback records.
Purpose: To create a culture of innovation by encouraging creative problem-solving and intellectual stimulation across the organization.
Key Components:
Idea Generation Process: Establish brainstorming sessions or an idea submission platform (e.g., internal portal) for employees to propose innovations.
Problem-Solving Framework: Use structured methods (e.g., Design Thinking, Root Cause Analysis) to address challenges.
Pilot Testing: Test new ideas on a small scale before company-wide implementation, with clear success metrics.
Recognition Program: Reward innovative contributions through public acknowledgment or incentives.
Responsibility: Department Heads, Innovation Team (if applicable), All Employees.
Output: Idea repository, pilot project reports, recognition records.
Purpose: To ensure transparent, inspiring, and consistent communication with internal and external stakeholders to build trust and alignment.
Key Components:
Communication Plan: Develop a schedule for regular updates (e.g., weekly newsletters, quarterly stakeholder meetings).
Inspirational Messaging: Leadership crafts messages that reinforce the company vision and motivate stakeholders.
Feedback Channels: Create avenues for stakeholders (e.g., employees, investors) to provide input (e.g., surveys, open forums).
Crisis Communication Protocol: Outline steps for addressing challenges transparently to maintain trust.
Responsibility: Executive Leadership, Communications Team.
Output: Communication schedules, stakeholder feedback logs, crisis response plan.
Purpose: To monitor performance and provide constructive feedback that aligns with transformational leadership principles, promoting growth and accountability.
Key Components:
Performance Metrics: Define KPIs aligned with company and team goals, reviewed quarterly.
Feedback Process: Conduct regular performance reviews (e.g., biannual) with a focus on strengths, growth opportunities, and alignment with vision.
Continuous Improvement: Use feedback to identify process improvements and update SOPs as needed.
Recognition System: Acknowledge achievements that reflect transformational leadership (e.g., leading by example, mentoring others).
Responsibility: Department Heads, HR Team, Executive Leadership.
Output: KPI dashboards, performance review records, recognition announcements.
Development: SOP Coordinator collaborates with Executive Leadership to draft and finalize each SOP using the company’s SOP template.
Training: HR conducts training sessions to familiarize leaders and employees with these SOPs.
Distribution: Upload SOPs to the company’s document management system and notify all personnel.
Monitoring: SOP Coordinator conducts quarterly audits to ensure compliance and effectiveness.
Review Cycle: Review each SOP annually or when triggered by significant growth milestones (e.g., workforce doubling, new market entry).
Updates: Revise SOPs based on feedback, performance data, or changes in company strategy, following the meta-SOP for SOP development (SOP-XXX-YYYY).
Archiving: Retire outdated SOPs and maintain records for 5 years.
SOP for SOP Development and Management (SOP-XXX-YYYY).
Company Vision and Strategic Plan.
Industry standards for transformational leadership (e.g., Bass & Avolio’s Transformational Leadership Model).
Version Date Description Author 1.0 2025-07-09 Initial SOP Creation SOP Coordinator
Albuterol inhaler = 2 puffs bronchospasm/asthma
Diphenhydramine vial = 25–50 mg allergic reaction
EpiPen – Adult = 0.3 mg IM anaphylaxis
EpiPen – Pediatric = 0.15 mg IM anaphylaxis
EpiPen – Trainer = Training only, no medication
Adrenaline (epinephrine) = 0.3–0.5 mg IM anaphylaxis
Nitroglycerin tablets = 0.4 mg SL chest pain
Nitroglycerin spray = 0.4 mg SL angina
Ammonia towelettes = Inhalation for syncope
Aspirin pack = 160–325 mg chew MI
Glucose gel = 15–20 g oral hypoglycemia
Syringes = Medication administration
CPR Shield = Barrier for rescue breathing
Oxygen = 2–15 L/min hypoxia/distress
Additional:
If opioids given = Naloxone 0.4–2 mg / Narcan intranasal
If Benzodiazepines given = Flumazenil 0.2 mg IV
For any type of blood draws or clinic services:
Access to eyewash.
Access to a sink (not for patient use).
Emergency Exit. Fire Extinguisher. Biohazard. Staff training.
For procedures:
Vital Signs and Monitoring before and after injection treatments.
Fluoroscopy Registration & Dosimetry (Even for 1 day of X-rays performed). Dept. of Health. Radiation Machines Registration.
Ultrasound. No radiation exposure.
ICD 10
https://thepainsource.com/icd-10-codes-for-physical-medicine-and-pain-management/
CPT
https://www.aapc.com/codes/cpt-codes-range
https://www.cms.gov/medicare/physician-fee-schedule/search
https://thepainsource.com/homepage/cpt-codes-pmr-pain-management-billing-and-coding/
CPT Codes 99202-99205 (New Patient ) = 15 min [0-14...] 99202: 15-29 min 99203: 30-44 minutes 99204: 45-59 minutes 99205: 60-74 m
CPT Codes 99212-99215 (Established ) = 10min [0-9...] 99212: 10-19 min 99213: 20-29 minutes 99214: 30-39 minutes 99215: 40-54 m
Modifier 51 Multiple Procedures indicates that multiple procedures were performed at the same session. It applies to: Different procedures performed at the same session.
Key Points Regarding Time for E/M Coding (Effective January 1, 2021):
Time is a Primary Factor (or Medical Decision Making - MDM): For office or other outpatient E/M codes (99202-99205 and 99212-99215), you can now choose the E/M level based on either:
Total time spent on the date of the encounter: This includes both face-to-face and non-face-to-face time performed by the physician or other qualified health care professional on the day of the encounter.
Medical Decision Making (MDM): This involves the complexity of problems addressed, amount and/or complexity of data to be reviewed and analyzed, and risk of complications and/or morbidity or mortality of patient management.
What Counts Towards Total Time? When using time to select an E/M level, make sure to document the total time and what activities contributed to it. This can include:
Preparing to see the patient (e.g., reviewing tests)
Obtaining and/or reviewing history
Performing a medically appropriate examination and/or evaluation
Counseling and educating the patient/family
Ordering medications, tests, or procedures
Referring and communicating with other healthcare professionals (when not separately reported)
Documenting in the electronic health record (EHR)
Independently interpreting results (when not separately reported)
Care coordination (when not separately reported)
What DOESN'T Count Towards Total Time?
Time spent by clinical staff (e.g., nurses, MAs)
Teaching residents or students
Time for services separately reported (e.g., a separately billable procedure performed on the same day).
Documentation is Key: If you choose to use time for code selection, your documentation must clearly reflect the total time spent and a brief summary of the activities performed during that time.
Example Documentation for Time-Based Coding:
"Patient encounter for established patient today totaled 35 minutes of physician time. This time included review of patient's recent lab results, discussion of treatment options for uncontrolled hypertension, medication reconciliation, patient education on diet and exercise, and coordination of care with cardiology." (This would support 99214).
Important Note: While time is a primary factor, the medical necessity of the visit must always be met, regardless of whether you choose time or MDM for code selection. The service must be reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis or treatment of illness or injury or to improve the functioning of a malformed body member.
Always refer to the most current CPT manual and official coding guidelines for the most accurate and up-to-date information.
99417 (Prolonged Office or Other Outpatient Evaluation and Management service(s) (beyond the total time of the primary procedure(s) highest level) 15 minutes increments, each additional 15 minutes)
How 99417 Works:
Primary E/M Code: First, you must select the appropriate highest-level E/M service based on either Medical Decision Making (MDM) or the initial total time threshold for that highest level code.
For new patients, this would be 99205 (75 minutes total time).
For established patients, this would be 99215 (55 minutes total time).
Threshold for Prolonged Services: You can only start billing 99417 after the maximum time for the highest level E/M code (99205 or 99215) has been exceeded by at least 15 minutes.
For 99205: Total time must exceed 74 minutes (i.e., reach 75 minutes) before you can consider 99417. The first 15-minute increment of 99417 starts after 89 minutes (74 minutes for 99205 + 15 minutes).
For 99215: Total time must exceed 54 minutes (i.e., reach 55 minutes) before you can consider 99417. The first 15-minute increment of 99417 starts after 69 minutes (54 minutes for 99215 + 15 minutes).
Billing in 15-Minute Increments:
99417 is reported for each additional 15 minutes of prolonged time.
You typically need to pass the midpoint of the 15-minute increment (i.e., 7.5 minutes) to bill for that increment.
Example Scenarios:
New Patient: If a new patient visit involves 95 minutes of total physician time:
You would bill 99205 (for the first 74 minutes, which is the range for 99205).
The remaining time is 95 - 74 = 21 minutes. Since 21 minutes is greater than 15 minutes, you would bill 99417 x 1 unit. (Technically, the first 15 minutes after the highest level is passed. The CPT guidelines are very specific about how the "extra" time is calculated for 99417).
Established Patient: If an established patient visit involves 80 minutes of total physician time:
You would bill 99215 (for the first 54 minutes, which is the range for 99215).
The remaining time is 80 - 54 = 26 minutes. Since 26 minutes is greater than 15 minutes, you would bill 99417 x 1 unit.
CPT Codes 99202-99205 (New Patient ) = 15 min [0-14, 15+, 30+, 45+...]
99202: 15-29 min
99203: 30-44 min 99204: 45-59 min 99205: 60-74 min
CPT Codes 99212-99215 (Established ) = 10min [0-9, 10+, 20+, 30+...]
99212: 10-19 min 99213: 20-29 min 99214: 30-39 min 99215: 40-54 min
Key Points Regarding Time for E/M Coding (Effective January 1, 2021):
Time is a Primary Factor (or Medical Decision Making - MDM): For office or other outpatient E/M codes (99202-99205 and 99212-99215), you can now choose the E/M level based on either:
Total time spent on the date of the encounter: This includes both face-to-face and non-face-to-face time performed by the physician or other qualified health care professional on the day of the encounter.
Medical Decision Making (MDM): This involves the complexity of problems addressed, amount and/or complexity of data to be reviewed and analyzed, and risk of complications and/or morbidity or mortality of patient management.
What Counts Towards Total Time? When using time to select an E/M level, make sure to document the total time and what activities contributed to it. This can include:
Preparing to see the patient (e.g., reviewing tests)
Obtaining and/or reviewing history
Performing a medically appropriate examination and/or evaluation
Counseling and educating the patient/family
Ordering medications, tests, or procedures
Referring and communicating with other healthcare professionals (when not separately reported)
Documenting in the electronic health record (EHR)
Independently interpreting results (when not separately reported)
Care coordination (when not separately reported)
What DOESN'T Count Towards Total Time?
Time spent by clinical staff (e.g., nurses, MAs)
Teaching residents or students
Time for services separately reported (e.g., a separately billable procedure performed on the same day).
Documentation is Key: If you choose to use time for code selection, your documentation must clearly reflect the total time spent and a brief summary of the activities performed during that time.
Example Documentation for Time-Based Coding:
"Patient encounter for established patient today totaled 35 minutes of physician time. This time included review of patient's recent lab results, discussion of treatment options for uncontrolled hypertension, medication reconciliation, patient education on diet and exercise, and coordination of care with cardiology." (This would support 99214).
Important Note: While time is a primary factor, the medical necessity of the visit must always be met, regardless of whether you choose time or MDM for code selection. The service must be reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis or treatment of illness or injury or to improve the functioning of a malformed body member.
Always refer to the most current CPT manual and official coding guidelines for the most accurate and up-to-date information.
99417 (Prolonged Office or Other Outpatient Evaluation and Management service(s) (beyond the total time of the primary procedure(s) highest level) 15 minutes increments, each additional 15 minutes)
How 99417 Works:
Primary E/M Code: First, you must select the appropriate highest-level E/M service based on either Medical Decision Making (MDM) or the initial total time threshold for that highest level code.
For new patients, this would be 99205 (75 minutes total time).
For established patients, this would be 99215 (55 minutes total time).
Threshold for Prolonged Services: You can only start billing 99417 after the maximum time for the highest level E/M code (99205 or 99215) has been exceeded by at least 15 minutes.
For 99205: Total time must exceed 74 minutes (i.e., reach 75 minutes) before you can consider 99417. The first 15-minute increment of 99417 starts after 89 minutes (74 minutes for 99205 + 15 minutes).
For 99215: Total time must exceed 54 minutes (i.e., reach 55 minutes) before you can consider 99417. The first 15-minute increment of 99417 starts after 69 minutes (54 minutes for 99215 + 15 minutes).
Billing in 15-Minute Increments:
99417 is reported for each additional 15 minutes of prolonged time.
You typically need to pass the midpoint of the 15-minute increment (i.e., 7.5 minutes) to bill for that increment.
Example Scenarios:
New Patient: If a new patient visit involves 95 minutes of total physician time:
You would bill 99205 (for the first 74 minutes, which is the range for 99205).
The remaining time is 95 - 74 = 21 minutes. Since 21 minutes is greater than 15 minutes, you would bill 99417 x 1 unit. (Technically, the first 15 minutes after the highest level is passed. The CPT guidelines are very specific about how the "extra" time is calculated for 99417).
Established Patient: If an established patient visit involves 80 minutes of total physician time:
You would bill 99215 (for the first 54 minutes, which is the range for 99215).
The remaining time is 80 - 54 = 26 minutes. Since 26 minutes is greater than 15 minutes, you would bill 99417 x 1 unit.
@T9 TP is T8;
@T10 TP is T9 ....
@ S1/ala is L5.
Cervical Stenosis: AP canal <10 mm, cord area <70 mm², CSF effacement, T2 cord signal.
Thoracic: AP canal <10 mm with cord compression or T2 signal.
Lumbar: Dural sac <75 mm², AP canal <10 mm, lateral recess <3–4 mm, foraminal fat loss.
Central canal stenosis is suggested when the anteroposterior (AP) canal diameter is less than 10 mm (absolute) or 10–13 mm (relative). A spinal cord cross-sectional area < 70 mm² is strongly associated with myelopathy. Cord compression, loss of CSF signal, and T2 hyperintensity within the cord indicate clinically significant stenosis. Foraminal stenosis is present with loss of perineural fat and nerve root deformation.
Thoracic stenosis is less common and usually pathologic. Central canal stenosis is suspected when the AP canal diameter is < 10 mm, particularly with cord flattening or deformation. Disc–osteophyte complexes, facet hypertrophy, or ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF) causing cord compression are significant. T2 cord signal change implies chronic compression or myelopathy.
Central canal stenosis is defined by a dural sac cross-sectional area < 100 mm² (relative) and < 75 mm² (absolute). AP canal diameter < 10 mm supports the diagnosis. Lateral recess stenosis is present when the AP height < 3–4 mm with traversing nerve root impingement. Foraminal stenosis is identified by foraminal height < 15 mm, loss of perineural fat, or exiting nerve root compression.
Severity increases with facet hypertrophy, ligamentum flavum thickening > 4–5 mm, disc bulge/herniation, osteophytes, and dynamic narrowing on flexion/extension imaging. MRI is preferred for neural compression; CT better characterizes bony contributors.
I. Cervical Stenosis (C-Spine)
A. Normal sagittal canal diameter: 17–18 mm
B. Absolute stenosis: <10 mm sagittal diameter
C. Relative stenosis: <13 mm sagittal diameter
D. Torg–Pavlov ratio: canal diameter ÷ vertebral body diameter
1. Stenosis: <0.80 (standard)
2. Severe/athletes: <0.70
E. Kang MRI grading
1. Grade 0: No stenosis
2. Grade 1: >50% subarachnoid space obliteration, no cord deformity
3. Grade 2: Cord deformity, no signal change
4. Grade 3: T2 cord signal change (myelomalacia)
II. Thoracic Stenosis (T-Spine)
A. Less common; no universally standardized grading system
B. Diagnostic threshold: AP canal diameter <10–12 mm or direct cord compression
C. Key indicators
1. OPLL or OLF causing canal narrowing
2. Central disc herniation with >50% canal compromise
III. Lumbar Stenosis (L-Spine)
A. Primary metrics: dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCA) and nerve root morphology
B. Quantitative criteria
1. Relative stenosis: DSCA 75–100 mm² or AP diameter <12 mm
2. Absolute stenosis: DSCA <75 mm² or AP diameter <10 mm
C. Schizas MRI classification
1. Grade A (mild): CSF visible; rootlets dorsal
2. Grade B (moderate): Rootlets fill sac; CSF grainy
3. Grade C (severe): No visible rootlets; no CSF
4. Grade D (extreme): No rootlets; complete loss of posterior epidural fat
IV. Comparison Summary
A. Cervical: Normal 17–18 mm; absolute <10 mm; Kang grading
B. Thoracic: Normal 12–14 mm; absolute <10 mm; cord compression/OPLL
C. Lumbar: Normal >15 mm; absolute <10 mm; Schizas classification
Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament or Ligamentum Flavum
Research Studies Demonstrating Benefit with Platelet-Rich Plasma for Pain Management and Injuries
Multiple meta-analyses demonstrate that PRP reduces pain and improves function in knee osteoarthritis, with effects exceeding minimal clinically important differences (MCID) at several time points.
[1] A 2025 meta-analysis of 18 RCTs (1,995 patients) found PRP provided clinically significant pain relief at 3- and 6-month follow-up and functional improvement at all time points (1, 3, 6, and 12 months) compared to placebo.
[1] The benefit was influenced by platelet concentration, with high-platelet PRP (>1,000,000 platelets/µL) providing superior and more durable results.
A 2023 systematic review and meta-analysis of 24 RCTs (1,344 patients) confirmed PRP's effectiveness in improving VAS pain scores in knee osteoarthritis (MD = -1.03, 95% CI [-1.16, -0.9], p < 0.05).
[2] The same review found leukocyte-poor (LP) PRP was more effective than leukocyte-rich (LR) PRP for pain reduction.
Multiple studies demonstrate PRP superiority over hyaluronic acid for knee osteoarthritis, with significant improvements in pain at 6 and 12 months and better WOMAC function scores at 3, 6, and 12 months.
[3]
Lateral Epicondylitis (Tennis Elbow)
The most robust evidence for PRP in tendinopathy exists for lateral epicondylitis.
[4] A 2018 meta-analysis found patients treated with PRP for lateral epicondylitis reported significantly less pain in the long term (WMD, -1.39; 95% CI, -2.49 to -0.29; P = 0.01).
[5] Multiple randomized controlled trials have demonstrated positive responses to PRP injections for this condition.
Rotator Cuff Injuries
PRP demonstrates benefit when used as surgical augmentation for rotator cuff repairs, particularly for small- to medium-sized tears.
[6] A 2018 meta-analysis showed patients treated with PRP for rotator cuff injuries reported significantly less pain in the long term (WMD, -0.53; 95% CI, -0.98 to -0.09; P = 0.02).
[5] Meta-analysis suggests PRP may augment rotator cuff repairs, resulting in improved healing rates, reduced pain levels, and improved functional outcomes.
Chronic Tendinopathy After Failed Conservative Treatment
A 2025 systematic review specifically examining patients who failed conservative management found PRP significantly reduced pain at 6 months (MD: -0.83, 95% CI: -1.61 to -0.04) and 12 months (MD: -1.11, 95% CI: -2.10 to -0.12) compared to control treatments.
[7] This effect persisted at 24 months, though based on limited data.
Other Tendinopathies
Positive results have been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials for gluteus medius tendinopathy and plantar fasciopathy. [4] However, well-designed RCTs found no difference between PRP and saline injections for Achilles tendinopathy, and results for patellar tendinopathy have been mixed.
Safety Profile
PRP demonstrates an excellent safety profile with no significant increase in adverse events compared to other conservative treatments. A pooled analysis of 26 studies (1,051 patients) showed non-significant differences in adverse events between PRP and other treatments.
[3] Among studies reporting adverse events, there was no difference between treatment groups (7/241 versus 5/245; RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.48 to 3.59).[8]
Important Limitations
A 2014 Cochrane review concluded there was insufficient evidence to support routine use of PRP for musculoskeletal soft tissue injuries, citing heterogeneity in PRP preparation methods and study quality.
[8] The 2021 RESTORE trial, a high-quality RCT, found no significant benefit of PRP over placebo for knee osteoarthritis, highlighting ongoing controversy.
[9] Current American College of Rheumatology guidelines recommend against PRP due to very low-certainty evidence.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2025. Bensa A, Previtali D, Sangiorgio A, et al.New
Frontiers in Medicine. 2023. Xiong Y, Gong C, Peng X, et al.
Journal of Pain Research. 2022. Hunter CW, Deer TR, Jones MR, et al.Guideline
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine : Official Journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine. 2021. Finnoff JT, Awan TM, Borg-Stein J, et al.Guideline
The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2018. Chen X, Jones IA, Park C, Vangsness CT.
6.Platelet-Rich Plasma: Fundamentals and Clinical Applications.
Arthroscopy : The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery : Official Publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association. 2021. Sheean AJ, Anz AW, Bradley JP.
Pain Medicine. 2025. Nadeau-Vallée M, Ellassraoui S, Brulotte V.New
8.Platelet-Rich Therapies for Musculoskeletal Soft Tissue Injuries.
The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2014. Moraes VY, Lenza M, Tamaoki MJ, Faloppa F, Belloti JC.
The Journal of the American Medical Association. 2021. Bennell KL, Paterson KL, Metcalf BR, et al.